Storm runs the all lady gauntlet.

Started by SuperiorTech15 pages

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Then she suffocates.

Either way, she would lose.😬

Yes there is a risk but sue can trap air in her force field she did it when the ff were crashed on the moon it only lasted them four minutes but that was her and three other people breathing.It nots gonna take her 4+ minutes to put a bubble in storms brain.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
O yea, I forgot.

Sue still is at risk of suffocation.doped

I guess they both can suffocate. I still think it would be close.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
That's actually a pretty good point. Attrition would probably be a great tactic for Storm.

Indeed. It's her best option, but Sue isn't going to suffocate before Storm's effectively decapitated.

Originally posted by SuperiorTech
The invisible woman created a force field to protect the X-men and storm created an updraft to slow the bubble.She did not penetrate the field with the wind.

I said she controlled the weather THROUGH the force-field. Ororo can create tornadoes that fit in the palm of your hand. In other words, Sue's force-field does not inhibit her control over the elements and she can control the mini atmoshphere in the field. She could just pull lightning out of the air around Sue...

Sue won't be able to see.😂

How can she project a force bubble into a target she cannot see??

On top of that, the pressure would be putting such a mental strain on her....

Storm is just too much for her.

Originally posted by Rutog98
I said she controlled the weather THROUGH the force-field. Ororo can create tornadoes that fit in the palm of your hand. In other words, Sue's force-field does not inhibit her control over the elements and she can control the mini atmoshphere in the field. She could just pull lightning out of the air around Sue...

Unless you show me her creating something INSIDE instead of outside the force field she cant.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Sue won't be able to see.😂

How can she project a force bubble into a target she cannot see??

On top of that, the pressure would be putting such a mental strain on her....

Storm is just too much for her.

again your going back to storm is faster than sue storm is gonna wipe up the tornado faster than sue kills her.

Originally posted by Soljer
Or, at least, that would be possible if Storm's head hadn't already been blown to pieces from the inside. doped.
droolio

Originally posted by SuperiorTech
Unless you show me her creating something INSIDE instead of outside the force field she cant.

Loud and wrong as usual. The force-field's interior is composed of the same energy as the exterior. Hence, the field can block out explosions if it takes place outside the field or contain explosions/energy, etc if within the field. Stop getting desperate.

Originally posted by SuperiorTech
again your going back to storm is faster than sue storm is gonna wipe up the tornado faster than sue kills her.

Neither of us have proof so.......

Do you have scans of Sues force bubbling an organism as to give an indication of speed.

I'm hearing a lot about as if it's a viable tactic, but 0 scans.

Considering how the lady can create tornadoes and thunderstorms that fit in the palm of her hand, she she could very easily beat out Sue or Magneto or Jean Grey by manipulating the air in the field to suffocate them, exiting the electrons in their field to electrocute them, lower the temperature in the field, etc.

Originally posted by Rutog98
Considering how the lady can create tornadoes and thunderstorms that fit in the palm of her hand, she she could very easily beat out Sue or Magneto or Jean Grey by manipulating the air in the field to suffocate them, exiting the electrons in their field to electrocute them, lower the temperature in the field, etc.

She me her doing any of that inside sues force field.

Originally posted by SuperiorTech
She me her doing any of that inside sues force field.

Show Sue force bubbling someone's body.

I want to see how fast it is.

Originally posted by Soljer
Indeed. It's her best option, but Sue isn't going to suffocate before Storm's effectively decapitated.

When has Sue ever decapitated someone? 😑

That seems horribly out of character.

Originally posted by SuperiorTech
She me her doing any of that inside sues force field.

She was inside Sue's force-field and did it on the other side of it.
She would be able to do the reverse since they are the same thing

Originally posted by Rutog98
She was inside Sue's force-field and did it on the other side of it.
She would be able to do the reverse since they are the same thing

When she created the wind it didnt pentrate the field it lifted it like i said until you can show me storm creating a wind inside sues sheild whether she is inside it or out she cant do it.

Originally posted by Rutog98
She was inside Sue's force-field and did it on the other side of it.
She would be able to do the reverse since they are the same thing

Oh, I see what you're saying.

You have a valid point.

Since Storm was able to send a psionic signal to alter the weather outside of Sue's shield while she, herself was inside, she could send a psionic signal inside of Sue's shield to create a hostile enviroment while she outside of it.

Point being, Sue's shield, as well as others' doesn't block Storm's powers from manipulating the interior. 😈

Actually that's ta non-sequite r of the "Affirming the consequent" cariety.

If A then B
B therefore A.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Actually that's ta non-sequite r of the "Affirming the consequent" cariety.

If A then B
B therefore A.

Ah, what the hell. 🙄

Denying the correlative fallacy on your part.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Ah, what the hell. 🙄

Denying the correlative fallacy on your part.

And you prove once again you know nothing more about logical fallacyies than looking up random ones.

I'm sorry, but what "alternative" did I suggest? I was pointing out the fallacy of assuming that because she worked the outside from the inside that that meant she could work the inside from the outside.

So no as I did not suggest any alternative I did not commit the "denying the correlative."

So once again you commit the "wishful thinking" fallacy...