"Evolving" Robots Challenge Evolution

Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
The divine revelation of Scripture, the fact that fossilization fits in with the Noachian Flood, and the lack of reliability of radiometric dating.

oh my GOD! noachian floods?????? really, youve been reading the enoch gospels too much. i suppose your gonna try to find evidence for the existance of the nephilim next!

and even the MOST unreliable form of carbon dating can at the very least put a minimum age on samples, concerning how OLD they are. and that has often been well over 6000 years. so even there, the argument wud fail.

Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
The divine revelation of Scripture, the fact that fossilization fits in with the Noachian Flood, and the lack of reliability of radiometric dating.

If fossilization fit with Biblical floods there should be giant humanoid skeletons all over the place.

Originally posted by ushomefree

We get it. Scientists must "document" evolution step by step, base pair by base pair, amino acid by amino acid, of a species into another species at I don't know how high a level in the Linnaean taxonomy to be deemed a different "kind" - a wholly unscientific term with no real criterion - for you to accept evolution. Because scientists haven't been able to document something that takes thousands if not millions of years, base pair by base pair, despite that humans haven't been around that long, you'll go on about how evolution is "just a theory." Of course not realizing that in science "theory" isn't a synonym for "conjecture." Therefore we get a thread seemingly about robots for you to try and prove ID by trying to discredit evolution as "just a theory" with links to the Discovery Institute - which has never really discovered anything (except how to steal videos from Harvard/XVIVO via the internet) and is thus a gross misnomer - despite that this doesn't in any way prove ID.

We get it. No one cares. Stop posting videos. Believe in your god all you want, just keep him out of science classes.

Speciation is the divergence of species is the evolution of reproductively isolated organisms. Don't subvert actual scientific terms into your bullshit.

Casey Luskin is a lawyer, and a bad one, whose scientific knowledge consists of skimming abstracts to quote-mine. No one uses Dembski's "information model" and his work has been highly criticized particularly for the misinterpretation of theorems which it regurgitates by the original authors of those theorems.

And of course there was no pun intended with "your a tool" sic because the clause doesn't even have a single coherent meaning, let alone two.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
If fossilization fit with Biblical floods there should be giant humanoid skeletons all over the place.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
1. There are no divine scriptures, for all books were written my humans. I don't believe in magic.

You can say that about any religious book. Take for instance Eastern spiritual books. They were writen by men...so...

As I said before, I'm not here to debate ushome because it's a pointless endeavor. The explanation was for others. My original posts answer any post he made on the last page, so there's no need for further rebuttal.

Also, the Hoyle allusion is simply laughable. The Boeing 747 analogy isn't even close to true, yet it's the most quoted argument for ID. If you're still relying on it as a debating point, it's clear you know nothing important about evolution.

Though I'd once again point out that the majority of ushome's post was demanding evidence, not providing rational backing for his own position. And often times I did provide evidence when he was demanding it, leading me to believe it's more of a rote response when he doesn't know what to say than an actual critique of my post.

xmarks above post is also commendable as analysis of ushome's tactics, and amusingly scathing.

Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
The Flood didn't happen overnight, you know.

I do know that. How would it change anything?

Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
You can say that about any religious book. Take for instance Eastern spiritual books. They were writen by men...so...

They are not divine inspired books of god.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
I do know that. How would it change anything?

Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
Humans are notorious for climbing out of reach of floodwaters.

katrina says otherwise.

That was a hurricane.

Also, a lot of those people were black.

Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
That was a hurricane.

Also, a lot of those people were black.

no no ur not a racist 15 year old.

Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
Humans are notorious for climbing out of reach of floodwaters.

So then there aren't fossils of giants from prior to the great flood because they climbed out of reach and survived? People must be real idiots to have not seen them for thousands of years.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
So then there aren't fossils of giants from prior to the great flood because they climbed out of reach and survived? People must be real idiots to have not seen them for thousands of years.

People are idiots, but for other reasons. 😆

Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
Also, a lot of those people were black.

And that is supposed to mean what?

Originally posted by Quark_666
And that is supposed to mean what?

that he's a racist perhaps. the stereo type that black people cant swim mostlikely. zeal my respect for you dropped. cangradulations!

It was likely a joke kids. I lol'd when I saw it and didn't really think him a racist.

Originally posted by DigiMark007
It was likely a joke kids. I lol'd when I saw it and didn't really think him a racist.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
So then there aren't fossils of giants from prior to the great flood because they climbed out of reach and survived? People must be real idiots to have not seen them for thousands of years.

^the nephilim have been proven to be medically impossible because the structure of bones would break down under the stress of so much weight, also, the length to mass ratio of bones does not increase proportionally, thats why the above satement is true for any humanoid arrangement of bone. plus lots of other problems would arise making the "damage to women" who angels have sex with, the least of the couple's problems. and again, no fossils have been found.

and wht the frig are you talking about???/ it takes two to tango. if an angel is having sex with a human, that human is ALSO having sex with the angel.