the current president of our country is like ralph wiggum from simpsons with jessica simsons iq. my answer is bush is a puppet and being controlled by a hand up his ass by non other than dick f*ckin cheney. and once again please lil miss ol conny rice dont let georgey boy play with matches again in the white house.
Originally posted by P23
the current president of our country is like ralph wiggum from simpsons with jessica simsons iq. my answer is bush is a puppet and being controlled by a hand up his ass by non other than dick f*ckin cheney. and once again please lil miss ol conny rice dont let georgey boy play with matches again in the white house.
EGADS!!! 😱
I can't believe you would say something like that!!! 😠
Jessica Simpson is not the stupid! 😠
Originally posted by dadudemon
*looks at the history of the word "idiot"*If you admit that then you know that you can't call it "factual" now can you?
Yes I can. Explain to me why I couldn't.
Originally posted by dadudemon
You brought it up, actually, when you tried to pass of Shaky's "idiocy" as "factual". How can someone pass of idiocy as factual? To be honest, I wouldn't have said anything at all if you wouldn't have tried to pass off your opinion as factual...AND I wouldn't have pointed it out with anyone else other than you, Bardock42 because you have "learned me" to "split hairs" about everything. 😄
Wrong. You brought it up because you couldn't conceive of anything related to idiocy being factual without applying Psychological definitions. And I wish I could "learn you" to "split hairs" in "situations where it applies" now.
Originally posted by dadudemon
You are correct...the original use was for a laymen or uneducated person..I concede that point...it doesn't change the fact that I corrected your trying to pass of Shaky's "idiocy" as "factual".
No, it doesn't change the fact that you tried to correct me. You are still not correct about that.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Indeed...I concede the point that idiot's original use is NOT based in psychology...I only thought it was since it was used in psychology as far back as the 19th century and you originally used the modern definition to make your point. That still does not change my entire point of bringing it up to begin with...you can't pass something off such as the context in which you used the word "idiot" as "factual".
Yes I can. No evidence why I can't.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I committed a logical fallacy by supporting my conclusion with one incorrect piece of evidence...however, my original point still stands that you incorrectly tried to pass off his idiocy as "factual".
Ok.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Let me show you how something can be factual...Factually, dadudemon farts 20+ times a day. (no doubt, b***hes)
Ok
Re: The President of the United States.....
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Do you think The President of the United States is actually a leader, or is he just a figurehead, someone who relies on others to make crucial decisions for him?
The president of the united states is just a puppet.He is SUPPOSE to be the commander in chief who runs the country but he gets his orders and follows them from the military industrail complex.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Indeed...I concede the point that idiot's original use is NOT based in psychology...I only thought it was since it was used in psychology as far back as the 19th century and you originally used the modern definition to make your point. That still does not change my entire point of bringing it up to begin with...you can't pass something off such as the context in which you used the word "idiot" as "factual".I committed a logical fallacy by supporting my conclusion with one incorrect piece of evidence...however, my original point still stands that you incorrectly tried to pass off his idiocy as "factual".
Let me show you how something can be factual...
Factually, dadudemon farts 20+ times a day. (no doubt, b***hes)
Are you actually that stupid? If someone posts non stop bollocks, on this forum, they are an idiot, on this forum. There's no assuming of educational background or anything else here, you present yourself as an idiot, as you have done constantly, you will get called on it, which you have done.
On this forum you are factually an idiot, as you have provided nothing to debate but your personal opinion on trivial, often off topic matters and internet learnt psychology.
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Are you actually that stupid? If someone posts non stop bollocks, on this forum, they are an idiot, on this forum. There's no assuming of educational background or anything else here, you present yourself as an idiot, as you have done constantly, you will get called on it, which you have done.
On this forum you are factually an idiot, as you have provided nothing to debate but your personal opinion on trivial, often off topic matters and internet learnt psychology.
My whole world just came crashing down...I wonder what it tastes like? I bet it tastes like chalk and charcoal at the same time...do you think?
Redundant much?
Mediocrity..wonderful.
Esophagus, maybe the eyes immediately following. Oh the taste of bone and blood at the same time.
Also, horribly wrong.
Originally posted by dadudemon
My whole world just came crashing down...I wonder what it tastes like? I bet it tastes like chalk and charcoal at the same time...do you think?Redundant much?
Mediocrity..wonderful.
Esophagus, maybe the eyes immediately following. Oh the taste of bone and blood at the same time.
Also, horribly wrong.
I'll do what you do, how about it?
Structure.
A wonderful thing.
Destroyed.
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Why are you so presumptuous?
Answering a question with a question, I see. Your question, predictably, does answer any of my questions. Let's start over. Answer these questions:
Originally posted by dadudemon
[1]Would you like me to explain everything I just did in my previous post?[2]Why are you so angry?
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Do you know what presumptuous actually means? Yes, that's a question, don't bother answering it with a web definition, that will prove more than anything that you don't.
You have avoided the question and are hiding behind what you think is clever. No one else is posting right now. Answer the questions directly: no games.
Originally posted by dadudemon
You have avoided the question and are hiding behind what you think is clever. No one else is posting right now. Answer the questions directly: no games.
OK, no, I'm not angry at all, I don't like people who constantly post shit, so I don't like you, it doesn't make me angry - it just makes me like you even less. My post is not redundant, as though you may think I do, I don't post a lot of shit, you do, I think a lot of people would agree that your posts are far more redundant than mine.
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
OK, no, I'm not angry at all, I don't like people who constantly post shit, so I don't like you, it doesn't make me angry - it just makes me like you even less. My post is not redundant, as though you may think I do, I don't post a lot of shit, you do, I think a lot of people would agree that your posts are far more redundant than mine.
Thank you. Was it that difficult to answer those questions?
And in response...
You really don't know what you are talking about. More or less, you are more crabby this morning than you usually are. It is 5 a.m. where you are right now; you have most likely been awake all night.
The vast majority of my serious posts are great.
Yours are full of negativity and anger and sometimes naivety. You are very insecure, especially when it comes to intellect. No doubt your presence in the GDF, thus far, is an attempt to belittle/berate others in an effort to gain acceptance from others; even if that acceptance is simply the posters acknowledging that you "burned" another poster.
You posses average artistic abilities but you want it to be more. This contributes to some of your insecurity. You have trouble connecting effectively in relationships with the opposite sex...no really deep connections are forged as you struggle to break that superficial barrier and make a connection.