The President of the United States.....

Originally posted by dadudemon
Thank you. Was it that difficult to answer those questions?

And in response...

You really don't know what you are talking about. More or less, you are more crabby this morning than you usually are. It is 5 a.m. where you are right now; you have most likely been awake all night.

The vast majority of my serious posts are great.

Yours are full of negativity and anger and sometimes naivety. You are very insecure, especially when it comes to intellect. No doubt your presence in the GDF, thus far, is an attempt to belittle/berate others in an effort to gain acceptance from others; even if that acceptance is simply the posters acknowledging that you "burned" another poster.

You posses average artistic abilities but you want it to be more. This contributes to some of your insecurity. You have trouble connecting effectively in relationships with the opposite sex...no really deep connections are forged as you struggle to break that superficial barrier and make a connection.

Woah, psycho analysis time is it? You're predictions are quite wrong I'm not going to point you in any direction. I may well be insecure, but intellect wise, no I'm not, I see it as something I can control, if you do want to bring my self esteem regarding my physical attractiveness into it, then fine, though I don't see a need and I find it to be purposefully finding something that greatly concerns me, and ripping it to shreds.

But yeah, thanks for the utter personal attack, I so far have only attacked your replying structure and the content, upped the game, didn't you? Maybe I tell too much of myself on this stupid thing.

Oh, yeah and reply to Bardock.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Woah, psycho analysis time is it? You're predictions are quite wrong I'm not going to point you in any direction. I may well be insecure, but intellect wise, no I'm not, I see it as something I can control, if you do want to bring my self esteem regarding my physical attractiveness into it, then fine, though I don't see a need and I find it to be purposefully finding something that greatly concerns me, and ripping it to shreds.

But yeah, thanks for the utter personal attack, I so far have only attacked your replying structure and the content, upped the game, didn't you? Maybe I tell too much of myself on this stupid thing.

Oh, yeah and reply to Bardock.

"Why are you so presumptuous?"

Also...

"[P]ersonal attack" is in the eye of the beholder.

Originally posted by dadudemon
"Why are you so presumptuous?"

Also...

"[P]ersonal attack" is in the eye of the beholder.

No, not really, when you raise something to do with my personal life and setbacks, which may I add is completely unrelated to the topic, or any conversation within it - that's a personal attack.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yes I can. Explain to me why I couldn't.

I apologize for not getting to this. I totally forgot all about this.

Anyway...

If you have an understanding on the history of the word "Idiot", then you should realize that stating something such as "factually an idiot" would have a connotation of a tangible measurement - due to the history of the use of the word. Just as you put it, I felt that for those reading, I had to correct it lest there be confusion.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Wrong. You brought it up because you couldn't conceive of anything related to idiocy being factual without applying Psychological definitions. And I wish I could "learn you" to "split hairs" in "situations where it applies" now.

No..but close. I felt that others who were reading that might get the wrong interpretation from what you were posting. I wanted to clear it up for our readers. Do you remember, the whole reason I did this in the first place?

Originally posted by Bardock42
No, it doesn't change the fact that you tried to correct me. You are still not correct about that.

In retrospect, I should have been much more forth coming about my intentions and perspective as it would have saved both of us time...however, I did learn something new from our pointless conversation: "idiot" was not first used in early psychology.

Are you satisfied with my response?

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
No, not really, when you raise something to do with my personal life and setbacks, which may I add is completely unrelated to the topic, or any conversation within it - that's a personal attack.

You have said too much.

Originally posted by dadudemon
You have said too much.

What?

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
What?

Care to expand on that a little?

More importantly...

Do you feel that President Bush was more of a puppet in his first term and then gradually "came into his own" during his second? Or do you think it has always been a mixture for President Bush in both terms with no linear progression? ("progression", in this context, is not being used to portray President Bush in a positive manner, rather, it is just referential to a time function as it relates to the quantity of direct decisions made by President Bush.)

Originally posted by dadudemon
I apologize for not getting to this. I totally forgot all about this.

Anyway...

If you have an understanding on the history of the word "Idiot", then you should realize that stating something such as "factually an idiot" would have a connotation of a tangible measurement - due to the history of the use of the word. Just as you put it, I felt that for those reading, I had to correct it lest there be confusion.

The word idiot as I used it has an exact definition. If someone's behaviour applies to it they are factually an idiot. You don't need an IQ test or any sort of official measurement. The definition alone is enough to make something factual.

Originally posted by dadudemon
No..but close. I felt that others who were reading that might get the wrong interpretation from what you were posting.

That's their problem. What I said was grammatically and semantically correct.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I wanted to clear it up for our readers. Do you remember, the whole reason I did this in the first place?

To be a dick?

Originally posted by dadudemon
In retrospect, I should have been much more forth coming about my intentions and perspective as it would have saved both of us time...however, I did learn something new from our pointless conversation: "idiot" was not first used in early psychology.

Glad I could educate you.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Are you satisfied with my response?

Yes.

Originally posted by Bardock42
That's their problem. What I said was grammatically and semantically correct.

LOL!!! It looks like we will never come to agreement that you can't pass off your opinion on someone as being "factual". Read my next response.

Originally posted by Bardock42
To be a dick?

No...well yes...and no...sort of. The answer to this question: "Do you remember, the whole reason I did this in the first place?" was to be like YOU! Splitting hairs just for the sake of having "split hairs" was why I did it...because it was YOU! I wouldn't have done that to anyone else. So yes, I was being a dick...but I was being like you for fun.

Originally posted by dadudemon
LOL!!! It looks like we will never come to agreement that you can't pass off your opinion on someone as being "factual". Read my next response.

I can, if my opinion is factual.

Originally posted by dadudemon
No...well yes...and no...sort of. The answer to this question: "Do you remember, the whole reason I did this in the first place?" was to be like YOU! Splitting hairs just for the sake of having "split hairs" was why I did it...because it was YOU! I wouldn't have done that to anyone else. So yes, I was being a dick...but I was being like you for fun.

But you failed at it. You split hairs where there wasn't anything to split as I was correct.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Woah, psycho analysis time is it? You're predictions are quite wrong I'm not going to point you in any direction. I may well be insecure, but intellect wise, no I'm not, I see it as something I can control, if you do want to bring my self esteem regarding my physical attractiveness into it, then fine, though I don't see a need and I find it to be purposefully finding something that greatly concerns me, and ripping it to shreds.

But yeah, thanks for the utter personal attack, I so far have only attacked your replying structure and the content, upped the game, didn't you? Maybe I tell too much of myself on this stupid thing.

Oh, yeah and reply to Bardock.

You should pay him for the analysis, maybe he's like Freud and will take cocaine in lieu of money.

Dadudemon, can you psycho analyze me next?

Originally posted by Bardock42
I can, if my opinion is factual.

But you failed at it. You split hairs where there wasn't anything to split as I was correct.

No, your opinion on how much of an idiot he is is not factual. I do not know, really know how you could make that factual, anytime, unless of course you tested him or he was tested for idiocy from a well excepted and refined testing method.

Originally posted by Robtard
You should pay him for the analysis, maybe he's like Freud and will take cocaine in lieu of money.

Dadudemon, can you psycho analyze me next?

No. He said I was way off, remember? 😉 I do take money for payment but I am not a psychologist. (Imagine that. 🙄 )

Originally posted by dadudemon
No, your opinion on how much of an idiot he is is not factual. I do not know, really know how you could make that factual, anytime, unless of course you tested him or he was tested for idiocy from a well excepted and refined testing method.

That's your limitation. There is certain definition of "idiot", if it applies to the person it makes them "factually" an idiot. I don't need one of the psychological testing methods you are so fond of, I just need to apply reason to his statements. If they are unreasonable (foolish) he is in reality an idiot by definition. Dude, just quit while you are only far behind, it will just go down from here.

Originally posted by Bardock42
That's your limitation. There is certain definition of "idiot", if it applies to the person it makes them "factually" an idiot. I don't need one of the psychological testing methods you are so fond of, I just need to apply reason to his statements. If they are unreasonable (foolish) he is in reality an idiot by definition. Dude, just quit while you are only far behind, it will just go down from here.

Just because you talk down to me and play up how much better your statements are then mine, doesn't make your correct.

Regardless of how you put it, how correct you think you are, you can never be correct because you are trying to pass of a relative/subjective term as a fact for another poster. You will never be correct in saying his is FACTUALLY an idiot. You can call him an idiot..great...but you cannot say his idiocy is factual.

I will NOT go over this again. If you make a reply post about this "factual" debate, I will not respond. You were exaggerating with your post and we both know that.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Just because you talk down to me and play up how much better your statements are then mine, doesn't make your correct.

No, being right makes me correct.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Regardless of how you put it, how correct you think you are, you can never be correct because you are trying to pass of a relative/subjective term as a fact for another poster. You will never be correct in saying his is FACTUALLY an idiot. You can call him an idiot..great...but you cannot say his idiocy is factual.

It is not subjective.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I will NOT go over this again. If you make a reply post about this "factual" debate, I will not respond. You were exaggerating with your post and we both know that.

I see you took my advice. Good for you

Originally posted by Bardock42
Dude, just quit while you are only far behind, it will just go down from here.

The presidents of the USA are SELECTED and not ELECTED. Your democracy in reality is a dictatorship controlled by The Illuminati aka New World Order.

Originally posted by Katsu
The presidents of the USA are SELECTED and not ELECTED. Your democracy in reality is a dictatorship controlled by The Illuminati aka New World Order.

We know. Now let us go back to arguing which president were better if we had free will and they weren't evil puppets.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Do you think The President of the United States is actually a leader, or is he just a figurehead, someone who relies on others to make crucial decisions for him?

Hail to the chief we have chosen for the nation!

Originally posted by Bardock42
We know. Now let us go back to arguing which president were better if we had free will and they weren't evil puppets.

While I don't really care much for NWO theories lets be fair and admit that the USA is clearly not democratic...how many poor people get into government?

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
I really wish a percentage of this forum could be gassed.

crylaugh

Dunno why, but this really tickled me.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Thank you. Was it that difficult to answer those questions?

And in response...

You really don't know what you are talking about. More or less, you are more crabby this morning than you usually are. It is 5 a.m. where you are right now; you have most likely been awake all night.

The vast majority of my serious posts are great.

Yours are full of negativity and anger and sometimes naivety. You are very insecure, especially when it comes to intellect. No doubt your presence in the GDF, thus far, is an attempt to belittle/berate others in an effort to gain acceptance from others; even if that acceptance is simply the posters acknowledging that you "burned" another poster.

You posses average artistic abilities but you want it to be more. This contributes to some of your insecurity. You have trouble connecting effectively in relationships with the opposite sex...no really deep connections are forged as you struggle to break that superficial barrier and make a connection.

What an earth is all this about? For some reason you felt it upon you to link me to this via PM, and I'm the one seeking acknowledgement?

Look at you, joining the dots like some forensic psychologist in a movie, the trouble is you don't work in either the movies, or as a psychologist. Artistic abilities? I'm unsure how you could even know about my artistic abilities, I posted one poem on here, which was half jokingly posted. I don't know why on earth you are talking about my relationships with the opposite sex, could it be that you married young and feel you didn't have enough superficial fun?

Anyway, reported for bashing with personal attacks.