Chris Kent pulling a Hulk

Originally posted by King_Mungi
That issue was from the 1970's, but Blockbuster first appeared in 1965

Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist
When did Hulk first appear?

1962, so three years before Blockbuster

Originally posted by King_Mungi
1962, so three years before Blockbuster

So much for Hulk not being original...

Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist
****!!

So much for Hulk not being original...

Solomon Grundy came out in 1944 though 😖hifty:

Originally posted by King_Mungi
Solomon Grundy came out in 1944 though 😖hifty:

Hulk is a cheesy rip off.

Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist
YES!

Hulk is a cheesy rip off.

Solomon Grundy & Hulk are a bit alike, but Hulk is inspired just as much by Frankenstein & Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde. Grundy would become more Hulk-like in his behaviour after Hulk's popularity started rising; check out the 1970's Superfriends TV series.

Just glad I can bring joy to those who need it. I'm like Santa, but with a criminal record for things I should have been executed for.

Originally posted by King_Mungi
Just glad I can bring joy to those who need it. I'm like Santa, but with a criminal record for things I should have been executed for.

Originally posted by Nod
Your Canadian, everyone should be executed there.

Because as long as Canadians live, America is threatened right? 😈

That's what Thomas Jefferson said prior to America invading Canada during the War Of 1812.

(It didn't work out - we're still here. 😛 )

YouTube video

😛 jk

Originally posted by roughrider
Because as long as Canadians live, America is threatened right? 😈

That's what Thomas Jefferson said prior to America invading Canada during the War Of 1812.

(It didn't work out - we're still here. 😛 )

Good old Canadians even burned down part of the White House 😉

Originally posted by King_Mungi
Good old Canadians even burned down part of the White House 😉

That's actually a very common misconception - it was the British that actually razed Washington.

Originally posted by Soljer
That's actually a very common misconception - it was the British that actually razed Washington.

No it was Canadians, but we were considered British at the time as Canadians were not refered to as Canadians then.

Originally posted by Soljer
That's actually a very common misconception - it was the British that actually razed Washington.

It was British & Canadian troops together. Brits who had settled in Canada for a long time eventually became recognized as Canadians.

Originally posted by roughrider
It was British & Canadian troops together. Brits who had settled in Canada for a long time eventually became recognized as Canadians.

*Nods*

Originally posted by King_Mungi
No it was Canadians, but we were considered British at the time as Canadians were not refered to as Canadians then.

Being a British colony hardly makes you British. The troops that burned the white house were British, not Canadian - it's kind of hard to know what else to say when you're trying to dispute historical fact. 😬.

Originally posted by Soljer
Being a British colony hardly makes you British. The troops that burned the white house were British, not Canadian - it's kind of hard to know what else to say when you're trying to dispute historical fact. 😬.

Except that's what they were refered to as though 😬 Even in WW1 Canadian soliders were often refered to as British soliders even then sooooo *shrugs*

Uh huh...even in my 20th Century history book says it was Canadians 😬

Originally posted by King_Mungi

Uh huh...even in my 20th Century history book says it was Canadians 😬

Indeed, as I mentioned it's a very common misconception that was actually taught in most schools for much of the past. It's only (relatively) recently that it's been dispelled.

Originally posted by Soljer
Indeed, as I mentioned it's a very common misconception that was actually taught in most schools for much of the past. It's only (relatively) recently that it's been dispelled.

The class I took was actually just last year 😬

Where was this dispelled?