Originally posted by abhilegend
Oh, that's what you meant. You are right about that its not a standard showing for a normal superman. But when people like carver and BAV start using imaginary feats where Wonder Woman's lightning would beat superman despite it never doing anything on that level, I could be excused to use a showing superman actually beating diana, right?😮
Okay, now I am SURE what I said went over your head. Truth be told, I don't give a rat's ass about Superman or Wonderwoman. But what I did was illustrated how nonesensical your debating style looks from the opposite angle. These are the type of arguments YOU tyopically make, e.i. Superman speed blitzes so and so in the first nanosecond.
Originally posted by -Pr-
You're supposed to rise above that shit. I don't need another carver on this site, especially with how little time I've been spending here lately.Bran... Well, I just ignore Bran.
Another Carver? Abi is ten times worst than Carver. He argues low end/high end depending on whether or not he likes the character and doesn't even attempt to veil it. You recognized what he was doing in this thread, but most of the time you completely ignore it. For instance, his example of Superman taking magical lighting just happened to be when he was possessed by Eclipso, but with no mention of such. IMO, this is just dishonesty in debating.