Delta1938
True King of House of El
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
Why Diana killed Max was the only question Pr presented then, though.
Fair enough if you were more specifically replying to Pr, but it doesn't invalidate my point.
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
Why she went after Max in the first place was actually covered in the previous chapter of Sacrifice.
The plan was always "Get Max, for only Max can give a permanent solution to this".
I can show you that if you like.
I've read the fight. Your point would be valid if she didn't show incapable of knocking out or incapacitating Superman, and he avoided her lasso. In fact, her poor performance(in context) combined with all her narration of "he is SO strong," "he has so MANY abilities," ect, pretty much show how hopeless it was for her to win even with his handicapped state. The very interview you tried to one-up me with backs that she survived because she could think rationally and clearly and he did not.
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
Indeed.He hit Diana rushing in, face unguarded, not expecting the retaliation with what she was holding, right on the chin, with a [b]180 degree
haymaker, surrounded by a sun so near it envelops nearly the entirety of some of the panels they're in, and powerful enough to send her several million miles away.
Given the above and how well established the Kryptonian track record of "stronger sunlight stronger powers" is, likewise the lack of Kryptonian-level durability Diana suffers from, I would like to think Superman SHOULD be able to knock her out with such a punch.
Diana had no reason to lose any fight with any opponent in her series of that time if something like THAT couldn't do the trick.[/B]
I find it amusing with all the complaining about me using "real world fighting facts" you do then you use stuff when it suits you. I'd agree that her rushing in would be a factor, to a point. A pretty small one at this level, unless you can prove she was going at high speeds. But, "face unguarded?" REALLY? And her not expecting it? You're making excuses. Him throwing a haymaker is the only relevant point here.
And again on the Sun. You do realize that the scene you're referring to, actually supports they weren't as near it as others hope? If Superman and Wonder Woman were so close to the Sun in that that first panel where we see the Sun, they should be tiny dots considering the size of the Sun. And the scene where he punches her. Wonder Woman has the Sun at her back, then when she's punched, suddenly the Sun is behind Superman? Did they magically swap places? Probably not. Maybe, just maybe, they were actually fairly far from the Sun, but the artist did his best job to not make the scene boring and, ya know, the Sun is ****in' HUGE. Over 99% of the mass of our Solar System. So they could be pretty far but it still seem close. So, we have that Wonder Woman looks like the Sun is behind her when she's about to be punched, then unless they magically swapped places, it's behind Superman when he connects, indicating that they weren't that close to it. Wonder Woman nor Max mention once about Superman being more powerful than normal or anything else that would indicate it, something you would think the writer would convey if it was that important. The lead box doesn't melt when it should have(at the least, most likely vaporized) at the temperatures it was exposed to. And it appears the writer confirms the script had them never get past Venus. All these taken together? Yeah, I'm thinking he wasn't amped. But you keep hope up.
And Wonder Woman had no other reason to look so bad in her own series? Superman practically two or three shot Etirgan in his own series, caught his punch, and generally made him look weak. And I believe that series had Etirgan with a stalemate or two against Lobo, and I know that same series had him overpower Wonder Woman, so it's not like he was some Mid-Tier. It's not impossible for a character to look bad in their own series. Maybe, just maybe, Superman really is that much above her and being enraged he was showing it? It's not like he doesn't have the comparative showings to back it.
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
Leastways, she didn't.That was not a Superman at conventional physical levels of durability, however. Even Pr admits as much.
So because Pr said he was operating on levels we don't normally see him at somehow proves he was more durable than normal? Do you want to compare him facing opponents stronger than Wonder Woman and other feats of durability? No, him being enraged and fighting harder than normal doesn't prove he was more durable than normal.
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
Batman knocked out one of the plant god empowered Cheetahs otherwise shown trashing Superman several pages back. With a single punch.Batman has also drawn blood from Darkseid with a kick, if memory serves.
Batman isn't the best metric for trying to denigrate the physical prowess of a character.
Batman knocked-out one of the Cheetahs? Where? I looked several times trying to find it in the issue you seem to be referring to, but the only time I saw Batman at all was when he was turned into a snake-like Beastimorph so he couldn't use his gadgets(at least that was actually mentioned in narration). I also find it funny you don't specify which Cheetah, because it simply seemed like the male Cheetah was more powerful than the traditional female one, until she got a different power source(or whatever exactly happened; she looked different). I even recall the traditional female Cheetah having a tough time against Catwoman, so I don't know how good an argument there is there. Also worth mentioning, apparently the author had a shitload of context for the male Cheetah beating Superman. Would make sense considering how he beat Superman then got owned by J'onn. And I know your opinion on Martian Manhunter's strength compared to Superman's, which requires a double standard for you to argue, but you don't want to go there and argue Superman's strength versus Martian Manhunter's.
Anyways, yeah, Batman did draw blood from Darkseid with a kick. May or may not have been amped, he had Bekka's tech when he attacked. Would make sense since he couldn't do a damned thing against Superman previously in the storyline.
But I think you're right Batman isn't the best metric. Not because of the examples you gave, but the examples you didn't. Batman also hurt and drew blood from an apparently amped(from demonic mutation) Wonder Woman, and in BATMAN CONFIDENTIAL, one shot her(apparently) with a kick to the stomach. I'd say Batman isn't the best metric, because he's made Wonder Woman look bad multiple times.
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
Her other choice was to kill Superman.
Which she did not want to do.
Hence she went after Max.So she wouldn't have to kill Superman.
And yet she probably wouldn't have been able to pull that off without getting Max lassoed. He avoided the lasso, Max very well could've had Superman dodge or use his breath to deflect the tiara, or just get in close and grapple so she couldn't even use it. Or blind her with heat vision. But really, your argument helps me and hurts you. You're saying lethal force was the only thing left, because she couldn't incapacitate or restrain/contain him.
Originally posted by carver9
I agree with this 199 thousand %. He is the most stable out of the Superman group.
You are to Hulk the Bizarro version of your opinion on Rao.