Transfinitum
Angelus Domine Nuntiavit
Pssst! Hey! Everybody! That loveable goofball Sleepy is back, and boy is he about to remind us of how charming he can be when he makes elementary blunders, and thinks he has "caught" 'ol trans in the process!
Seriously, though, I gotta say I have twenty times more respect for Sleepy than some of the other supposedly "highly knowledgeable" folks I have debated on this thread- he has actually been the only substantive debater on the facts. He does his homework (even if he makes incredible blunders) but so what? He is at least willing to research, debate, and he keeps coming back for more, which makes for a better debate all around.
But first, we have another candidate for All Time Best Blunder By Sleepy In A Debate, and this one is a doozy, ladies and gentlemen!
Now buckle up Sleepy. This is for your own good now, ya hear?
Originally posted by Templares
"Oh looky here, i found Ruyong Wang's and Ronald Hatch study:
http://www.aliceinphysics.com/introduce/ion.pdf"
>>>Please, please, please, everybody click and read the link. Here, let me share with you a couple of…errrr….THERMONUCLEAR BOMBS dropped on Standard Theory just in the abstract and first few paragraphs:
"Contrary to the assertion of Special Relativity, the speed
of light is not always constant relative to a moving
observer. The Global Positioning System (GPS) shows
that the speed of light in the Earth Centered Inertial (ECI)
non-rotating frame remains at c relative to the frame—but
not relative to an observer or receiver moving in that
frame. When a GPS receiver changes its translation speed
relative to the ECI frame, the speed of light measured
relative to the receiver changes."
>>Now does everybody remember Sleepy going on and on about how the speed of light was a constant in a vacuum? And how Einstein proved this in Special Relativity, now and forevermore, world without end, Amen? And how trans was just a gosh durn idjit because he wasn't smart enough to grasp this?
And now. Ladies and gentlemen. The Sleepy Monster Blunder Machine is getting cranked up again!:
Originally posted by Templares
"Upon reading it, you'll notice several things that are wrong about what our Knowlegeable Poser's said:"One, the study DOES NOT deal with deep space/interplanetary probes at all. It is concerned with GPS."
>>>Now, gentle reader, please notice that Sleepy IMMEDIATELY POSTS- RIGHT AFTER TELLING US THAT THE STUDY DOES NOT MENTION INTERPLANETARY PROBES:
Originally posted by Templares
"Second, the quote:"The JPL equations, used to track signals from interplanetary space probes , verify that the speed of light is with respect to the chosen frame."
>>ROTFLMAO! I mean, only Sleepy could actually not notice a stupendous, obvious, Mount Everest sized blunder like this.
ROTFLMAO!!!
Sleepy, I honestly couldn't make you up. I wouldn't have the sand to invent a character as endearingly incompetent as you are. I am actually sitting here laughing with tears coming out of my eyes, you really ARE better than cable!
TO BE CONTINUED….