Fire does not burn Paper

Originally posted by Katsu
Please, tell me Educated One Who Knows All.

Where is your proof? Where is your proof? Stop talking about big words and other unrelated stuff trying to divert this conversation.

WHERE IS YOUR PROOF? I WANT PROOF. PROVE TO ME THAT FIRE DOES NOT BURN PAPER ONLY STEEL COLUMN BUILDINGS, PEOPLE AND BOEINGS?

You dont have any proof, only gullible theories. Your next reply will evade my questions. You will not be able to prove anything.

Please, show the people, how you are once again going to evade my questions.

My tip Kharmadog, take your passport, throw in it in a fire and see what happens. Its called The Laws of Physics! 😆

Wow....you're a nutjob.

He did it, he evaded the question

Originally posted by Furion
He did it, he evaded the question

There is no question to answer. Just the ramblings of a halfwit with meager language skills.

Originally posted by Katsu
Please, tell me Educated One Who Knows All.

You make yourself look like an ass with that comment.

Originally posted by Katsu
Where is your proof? Where is your proof? Stop talking about big words and other unrelated stuff trying to divert this conversation.

You are the one talking about "big words". You diverted the conversation. Everything that I talked about is related.

Originally posted by Katsu
WHERE IS YOUR PROOF? I WANT PROOF. PROVE TO ME THAT FIRE DOES NOT BURN PAPER ONLY STEEL COLUMN BUILDINGS, PEOPLE AND BOEINGS?

You didn't read my post did you? Once again, you look like an irrational child with poor reading skills.

Originally posted by Katsu
You dont have any proof, only gullible theories. Your next reply will evade my questions. You will not be able to prove anything.

I have nothing to prove. There is no question to evade. You are a moron.

Originally posted by Katsu
Please, show the people, how you are once again going to evade my questions.

I have nothing to prove. There is no question to evade. You are a moron.

Originally posted by Katsu
My tip Kharmadog, take your passport, throw in it in a fire and see what happens. Its called The Laws of Physics! 😆

Don't talk of physics, you barely understand English.

Obviously paper burns when in fire. Obviously you are an idiot.
Slow down, breath deep and think. Take a garbage can, fill it full of 4 pounds of C4 and a dozen reams of paper. Duct tape the lid shut. Blow up the Garbage can. Will all the paper be incinerated?

Originally posted by Furion
'Guess what, there was fire and extreme heat at the World Trade Center. Paper would burst into flames from the heat in the surrounding area.

The surrounding area was not that hot.

I am embarrassed to be arguing such simplistic points.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
bla disinfo bla

No corpses were found, no remains of the Boeing were found, the entire WTC was incinerated to ashes.

Why would a passport survive?

Why, according to your theory, havent we found a terrorist lying in the streets but only his passport?

Any normal person would never believe such a blatant lie. Its so obvious!

Only a disinfo agent would think of such ridiculous theory. 😆

How much do you get paid by the elite? 😘

I suppose there is the slight possibility of the passport being somehow trapped under some thick bit of metal borrowed from wolverines skeleton, which had been sprinkled with a certain unique chemical water compound long enough to save it, this could have caused an unique vacuum under itself due to pressure and suction of the air being burnt, and the melting floor around the passport.

But I doubt it.

Originally posted by Bicnarok
I suppose there is the slight possibility of the passport being somehow trapped under some thick bit of metal borrowed from wolverines skeleton, which had been sprinkled with a certain unique chemical water compound long enough to save it, this could have caused an unique vacuum under itself due to pressure and suction of the air being burnt, and the melting floor around the passport.

But I doubt it.

LMAO! 😄

Excellent theory mate! 😉

I have nothing more to say, this theory has to be true.

Case Closed

Why has no one addressed this question?

Originally posted by KharmaDog
Take a garbage can, fill it full of 4 pounds of C4 and a dozen reams of paper. Duct tape the lid shut. Blow up the Garbage can. Will all the paper be incinerated?

Originally posted by Katsu
No corpses were found, no remains of the Boeing were found, the entire WTC was incinerated to ashes.

Why would a passport survive?

Why, according to your theory, havent we found a terrorist lying in the streets but only his passport?

Any normal person would never believe such a blatant lie. Its so obvious!

Only a disinfo agent would think of such ridiculous theory. 😆

How much do you get paid by the elite? 😘

you do realise that every part of that is just absolute rubbish dont you?

there is photographic evidence of large pieces of the plane both within the wreckage...not to mention the engine that landed several streets from the WTC

there were thousands of body parts recovered...including ones still dressed in flight crew clothing

not to mention you only need to look at video footage of the aftermath of the towers collapsing to see hundreds of thousands of pieces of paper

dont believe me

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=hHpXS6xU_48

the start of that piece shows u a load of paper in the streets ^

and for the people who say it was a controlled straight down demolition

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=lI-RCpdy9tw

the footage at 3.15 on this video...look at the massive piece of the tower still standing on the right hand side...does that happen in controlled demolitions?....mmm...dont think so

I'm just going to leave this thread cause you guys are beyond stupid. you're retarded. If you're going to think pure crap then good for you.

Originally posted by Furion
I'm just going to leave this thread cause you guys are beyond stupid. you're retarded. If you're going to think pure crap then good for you.

yeah...that's why you're leaving the thread....nothing to do with your points just getting raped to death

Originally posted by Furion
I'm just going to leave this thread cause you guys are beyond stupid. you're retarded. If you're going to think pure crap then good for you.

Cut and run and try to save dignity...too late.

Originally posted by jaden101
yeah...that's why you're leaving the thread....nothing to do with your points just getting raped to death

The obvious nature of that comment is both biting and slightly humorous.

I checked his profile, the kid is 13 years old. Why is every conspiracy theorist and naive/immature kid or a complete wing-nut?

al quaida wasnt responsible for 9/11. end.of.story.

Originally posted by Deano
al quaida wasnt responsible for 9/11. end.of.story.

That is an impotent comment.

I'll even raise the stakes to my question directed to many of the mental midgets in this forum:

Take a garbage can, fill it full of 4 pounds of C4 and a dozen reams of paper. Add a gallon and a half of gasoline. Duct tape the lid shut. Blow up the Garbage can. Will all the paper be incinerated?

Originally posted by KharmaDog

The obvious nature of that comment is both biting and slightly humorous.

i try to blend a heady mix of subtlety and complete bluntness...i find it most effective

Originally posted by jaden101
i try to blend a heady mix of subtlety and complete bluntness.

Balance is everything.

Ok, disinfo agents, you "win", the Official Story is true. Fire does not burn Paper.

Still.......

The science community around the world and Japanese parliament tell us that official story is a LIE and can never be true because the laws of physics are involved. Now, when it comes to credibility ill go with the scientists and Japanese parliament anyday. You are only noobish nitwits posting on some movie forum who have not studied the laws of physics, obviously.

Why would i believe your ignorant theories when scientists contradict everything you have said?

Originally posted by KharmaDog
Cut and run and try to save dignity...too late.

The obvious nature of that comment is both biting and slightly humorous.

I checked his profile, the kid is 13 years old. Why is every conspiracy theorist and naive/immature kid or a complete wing-nut?

Originally posted by KharmaDog
That is an impotent comment.

I'll even raise the stakes to my question directed to many of the mental midgets in this forum:

Take a garbage can, fill it full of 4 pounds of C4 and a dozen reams of paper. Add a gallon and a half of gasoline. Duct tape the lid shut. Blow up the Garbage can. [b]Will all the paper be incinerated? [/B]

so by your conclusion, bin laden was responsible. ok. and here i was thinking he was just another cia asset

😐

Originally posted by jaden101
you do realise that every part of that is just absolute rubbish dont you?

there is photographic evidence of large pieces of the plane both within the wreckage...not to mention the engine that landed several streets from the WTC

there were thousands of body parts recovered...including ones still dressed in flight crew clothing

not to mention you only need to look at video footage of the aftermath of the towers collapsing to see hundreds of thousands of pieces of paper

dont believe me

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=hHpXS6xU_48

the start of that piece shows u a load of paper in the streets ^

and for the people who say it was a controlled straight down demolition

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=lI-RCpdy9tw

the footage at 3.15 on this video...look at the massive piece of the tower still standing on the right hand side...does that happen in controlled demolitions?....mmm...dont think so

Apparently though, it means nothing because 'no proof' rules it out. 🙂

Originally posted by Katsu

Still.......

The science community around the world and Japanese parliament tell us that official story is a LIE and can never be true because the laws of physics are involved. Now, when it comes to credibility ill go with the scientists and Japanese parliament anyday. You are only noobish nitwits posting on some movie forum who have not studied the laws of physics, obviously.

Why would i believe your ignorant theories when scientists contradict everything you have said?

i posted a comprehensive list of all the independant people who ACTUALLY carried out the scientific investigative work into the 9/11 attacks and they dispute your opinion...and thats what yours and any scientist who only investigated 2nd hand published work is...opinion

"noobish nitwits!...ok then...i have a bachelor of science with honours 1st class degree in forensic science which includes qualification in fires, fuels and explosives....i have masters in document forgery and i'm studying for a PhD in forensic science which includes instrumental analysis for drugs and fire & explosion investigation

so i do actually know a little about what is being discussed in relation to those attacks

like i said before though...feel free to browse through the 9/11 thread for the back and forth between the pro conspiracy and anti conspiracy arguments and see if anything changes your mind...most likely it wont but at least you'll have learned something