Originally posted by Furion
🙂 You would know how it worked how? You got C4? Tell me where you got it.
Again, holy crap.
The severity of the blast would discharge the paper at such a velocity that most if it, despite the accelerant and fuel, would be dispersed over such a great area that it could not catch fire. Only the paper that landed directly on the resulting fire would be incinerated. Paper does burn in fire, paper that is blown in various directions away from the heat source does not.
I´d like to mention that this playing with explosives business can have a very negative effect on ones health, and I´d advice those experimenting to refrain from continuing.
Also the unique situation at 9/11 can never be reproduced in someones garden, bunker or whatever so its pointless anyway.
I wonder if any other passports were found, from other would be passengers. Any info on this?
Originally posted by Bicnarok
Also the unique situation at 9/11 can never be reproduced in someones garden, bunker or whatever so its pointless anyway.
I think anyone with common sense will agree to that statement. My point was to illustrate that when an object that contains paper explodes, any object, the paper will be dispersed in a manner that is so quick, violent, random and with such force, that much of the paper will fall outside the blast site, thereby not submitting it to a situation where it will be instantly incinerated.
Originally posted by KharmaDog
I think anyone with common sense will agree to that statement. My point was to illustrate that when an object that contains paper explodes, any object, the paper will be dispersed in a manner that is so quick, violent, random and with such force, that much of the paper will fall outside the blast site, thereby not submitting it to a situation where it will be instantly incinerated.
really the example isn't even neccesary...the debri both before the towers collapsed and afterwards speaks for itself....although clearly not loud enough for certain idiots to hear
Originally posted by jaden101
really the example isn't even neccesary
I know, but I figured if I could relate the occurance into a more proportionately easy to conceive occurence, that the slow learners in the crowd might be able to catch up. Does that make sense? Did you at least see the point, or was it completely wasted?
Originally posted by jaden101
...the debri both before the towers collapsed and afterwards speaks for itself....although clearly not loud enough for certain idiots to hear
Testify!
Originally posted by KharmaDog
I know, but I figured if I could relate the occurance into a more proportionately easy to conceive occurence, that the slow learners in the crowd might be able to catch up. Does that make sense? Did you at least see the point, or was it completely wasted?Testify!
it wasn't completely wasted...i think you may have missed your target though...although given how much they like to move their goal posts it's not really a surprise
Originally posted by KharmaDog
I think anyone with common sense will agree to that statement. My point was to illustrate that when an object that contains paper explodes, any object, the paper will be dispersed in a manner that is so quick, violent, random and with such force, that much of the paper will fall outside the blast site, thereby not submitting it to a situation where it will be instantly incinerated.
Not even possible but what about a slow burn?
God damn, give it up 💃
Originally posted by Katsu
This topic shows us the stupidity of disinfo agents at work.Fire Burns Paper Disinfo Agents.
And this post shows your inability to either comprehend or actually read the posts of others.
Originally posted by KharmaDog
As for the misleasding title of the thread and the simplistic observation behind it ...Of course paper burns you simpleton, but massive explosions and collisions on the scale that took place that day scatter debris, not instantly insinerate it.
I had to look at you profile, as I was interested in your age and level of maturity. I thought if you were 13-15 years old that your inability to form and maintain a cohesive argument or point would be explained, as would your inability to think things through in a clear and logical manner that may be disinclined to confirm your predisposed beliefs.
After having seen that you are in your mid to late 20's, I have to ask:
Do you suffer from a minor learning disability?
Are you lying about your age?
Have you ever needed the service of mental health professionals or have you ever had to subscribe to a proscription medication for better mental health?
I don't ask these questions to be offensive, I ask them so that I may not say anything that could be considered offensive in future posts. I also ask them because they would explain quite abit when i comes to the manner that you post, express yourself, and your general post history.
Originally posted by BicnarokWhy would they mention victim passports?
I´d like to mention that this playing with explosives business can have a very negative effect on ones health, and I´d advice those experimenting to refrain from continuing.Also the unique situation at 9/11 can never be reproduced in someones garden, bunker or whatever so its pointless anyway.
I wonder if any other passports were found, from other would be passengers. Any info on this?
Originally posted by jaden101
i've disproved your depserate idiocy countless times now...it's getting boring
I hit that point months ago. Welcome.
Now I just bounce around with sarcasm, pithy remarks, and the occasional tidbit of information that doesn't so much expose the foolish, so much as accessorize their spastic persona's.
Originally posted by KatsuMaybe it's all a Coincidence. 😆
After 9-11, they found a passport from one of the hijackers."ABCNEWS sources identify another hijacker as Satan Suqami, a Saudi national on American Airlines Flight 11, whose passport was recovered in the rubble."
Ok, so we have 2 possible scenarios as to how this happened:
1. Terrorist named Satan rolled down the Boeing 747 window to smoke a cigarette and by accident his passport fell out of his pocket unto the streets of New York.
2. Terrorist named Satan needed to take a piss, opened the Boeing 747 door to take a leak and in the moment decided to throw his passport unto the streets of New York just for fun of it.
Ok, people, i know you think everything the officials tell you is true..............but really, come on, this is just The Elite making fun of us being ignorant and gullible!
🤣Steel columns melted, burned for weeks after but paper passports stay unharmed!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!! LMAO!
Originally posted by jaden101
"disinfo agents"...i like that...that's quite comicali've disproved your depserate idiocy countless times now...it's getting boring
yep we know your a disin fo agent.we see how you make things up all the time 😛 this SECOND sentence here would be accurate if Katsu was posting that to YOU.