Originally posted by llagrokHe still went toe to toe with him and took his best. Of course he had to use the gun as he couldnt ko Thor with the power gem.
Thanos had to freeze him with his gun....Thanos has never killed the Surfer either...
Thanos has beaten the Surfer into submission and it doesnt matter if he has killed him or not before.
Originally posted by illadelph12Drax is a unique situation. He is the only one who has killed him in this manner. So therefore its safe to assume its not that easy and the cheapshot thing had something to do with this let alone he had just been resurrected with this ability. For one Apoc isnt going to be facing Thanos with his back turned and even if he was he could barely phase him. Thanos can regenerate. Listen to what the comic is telling you. Drax is the only one who could do it. hence the silver bullet theory.
Simple, actually.Thanos has been cut and impaled. Apocalypse has a means to cut and/or impale him.
There's no evidence whatsoever that Drax is the only character capable of impaling him, additionally, on panel evidence clearly shows other characters besides Drax being capable of bludgeoning and cutting him. Moreover, Apocalypse has, on panel, impaled another Eternal, Ikaris, through the chest via a spike applied during a bear hug.
Furthermore, regardless of whether it's Drax removing his heart or another character is inconsequential, the on panel evidence would clearly suggest that characters other than Drax can harm him by these means due to his prior injuries. Impalement is simply a puncture wound, and Thanos's body has been compromised by these means priorly by other characters. There is no evidence that would suggest that if any character other than Drax impaled him he would shrug it off because they are not his "kryptonite", and alternately, there is evidence that clearly depicts other characters without Drax's properties have harmed Thanos, and heart removal is a fatal wound, regardless of the source.
So, as I'll state again, it's not the most popular outcome, but it's feasible, and the evidence to support it exists, regardless of popular opinion.
Originally posted by illadelph12
I don't see how people can claim that Drax is the only character that can harm Thanos physically when he's been physically harmed (bludgeoned and cut), on panel, by other characters such as Gamora and Wolverine. Impalement and cutting are in the same vein of attack, and it's been proven that characters other than Drax are capable of doing so. I see no logical reason why Apocalypse shouldn't be able to impale Thanos. Silver bullet or not, an arm through the chest is an arm through the chest, and claws to the grill is claws to the grill. Apocalypse was also able to impale Ikaris, also an Eternal, through the chest by morphing his own chest into a spike while he bear hugged Ikaris. I think it's feasible. Unpopular, but feasible. I still see the battle as a draw, however, but some of you are grasping at straws with your explanations of Thanos not being able to be effected through physically means when on panel evidence would contradict that.
Originally posted by janus77
could Apocalypse kill Thanos?
is Apocalypse more powerful than Odin? is that what you're getting at?
Was Odin physically trying to hurt Thanos?
Thanos who can absorb/redirect energy pretty easily?
Like I've made it clear a bunch of times earlier, I think Thanos is far easier to hurt physically.
Originally posted by Xplosive
Like I said, many already give wins to Thanos, well because he is Thanos.This is one example. Even Thanos wins, it won't be so easily like you say in a pure physical match and he won't destroy him.
Originally posted by llagrokWhen does Odin try to get all physical on opponents. Seriously, who has beaten the shit out of Thanos physically then. I want to hear this. I cant believe this thread has gone on as long as it has considering this is kinda spite here. Thanos would absolutely decimate Apocalypse.
Was Odin physically trying to hurt Thanos?
Thanos who can absorb/redirect energy pretty easily?Like I've made it clear a bunch of times earlier, I think Thanos is far easier to hurt physically.
Originally posted by quanchi112
When does Odin try to get all physical on opponents. Seriously, who has beaten the shit out of Thanos physically then. I want to hear this. I cant believe this thread has gone on as long as it has considering this is kinda spite here. Thanos would absolutely decimate Apocalypse.
Odin doesn't. This doesn't mean that Thanos can't absorb and/or redirect energy, now does it?
Nobody has beaten Thanos physically, bar Drax. Just like no one has ever beaten Apocalypse physically, no one. Unfortunately for Thanos, he won't get to use his forcefields and energyblasts like he did against the Champion.
Originally posted by llagrokWith the Power Gem... lulz. Also, he was sent on his knees from Cyclops in the same issue...
And Thanos has been sent far back by hits from Thor.
🙂
Originally posted by llagrokCable had a good run with him... ermm
Just like no one has ever beaten Apocalypse physically, no one. Unfortunately for Thanos, he won't get to use his forcefields and energyblasts like he did against the Champion.
So... Apoc is as strong, and durable as Champion with the PG?