ThunderGodEneru
Senior Member
Originally posted by Burning thought
1. But done none of it in his full form apprently, and no BS, thats not a strawman....2. Yes you do, you cant assume anything, If i said kain can fire super godlike universe destroying beams from his ass and then said you had to prove he cannot thats a fallacy right there.....your pretty much doing something similiar, your [b]assuming without logic or evidence
an aspect of Pyrons abilities that are never shown. As I said your talking BS, this is nothing to do with proof, this is about you inventing BS because you think hes doing something it doesnt say hes doing, and bring up those scans and ill prove it for the millionth time. The same with you, your the one who is giving Pyron powers just because you think him scanning something or seeing something from a long distance constitutes to him being able to see the entire battlefield at once from every angle lol, whats next, Pyronz can scan planets so hes as big as the Andromeda galaxy! durlaughnah, go and learn what the fallacies actually are, your the one simply inventing shit out of your ass, so technically I dont have to prove anything for YOUR character.
3. So okie, he took a human form...and saying "zomg your not superior your wrongs!" doesnt help your argument, what I said was logically correct and the game doesnt say anywehre in it that he randomly loses energy just because he is smaller yet logic dictates hes using more if hes expanding it into his fully sized form.
not really, its completly diffrent in size and substence, shattering some large lumps of rock and metal ore elements is not the same as somehow destroying an object many times larger made of hydrogen. [/B]
1. "This is when one person corrupts an opponent's argument into something different, a "straw man" that they set up just to knock it down."
You are corrupting my argument to refute it, hence a strawman. Although honestly, your argument does share similarities with a Red Herring. Hell, I did not even mention Pyron using powers in his full size, but you brought it up without making a single argument for Highfather, which is also technically a Red Herring.
In other words, you fail.
2. I assume nothing. You say that Pyron could have a charge time. I don't have to prove he does not, you have to prove he does, the burden of proof, is on you. Not me. I don't have to prove the negative, you have to prove the positive which YOU claimed. And you cannot prove it, Pyron moved like an inch in the scan, then we see him as a star in the distance. Should we assume he has this super slow acceleration based off that? How about no? As a matter of fact, you cannot prove he really started moving in his destination at all, he clearly changed directing before flying off in the distance, as you can see here, the "star" in the distance that is Pyron and Pyron near Earth are in the same spot on the scan, only Pyron is not really visible when he flew away, he is a star. And my argument was never really that he did not have to build momentum, only that you have insufficient evidence to claim he has slow accelleration, which you are implying he does. He could start at 10% of lightspeed when he starts moving, he would still by feats be tremendously faster than the Pantheon.
http://img178.imageshack.us/my.php?image=58699226qn7.jpg
And you are nit-picking, Pyron can based on feats crush the Pantheon with his bare hands, he does not need his other powers, you have not provided a THING in the Pantheon's defense.
Strawman again. You suck at this, debating I mean. Pyron has both of the key traits of Cosmic Awareness, I have proven he has them before, and yet he does not? Really? Lol. The every angle part is an overestimation I admit, though logical, considering Pyron does not actually have eyes so his vision would not be limited to them.
Yeah, you do, you have to prove things when you claim them, character does not matter. You claim that Pyron has to build some ungodly amount of momentum before reaching top speed, hence, burden of proof is on you. You claim that eating a planet has a charge time, hence, burden of proof is on you. My character or not, the burden of proof is not on me to prove YOUR claims, maybe you should learn the basic rules of debating first. If a republican claims that Barack Obama is a Muslim while debating a democrat, by your logic the democrat would have to prove he is not, but that is fallacious. The Republican has to prove he is.
And I know what the fallacies are, those were their correct usages.
3. You would be correct if it only said he took a human form, but it then says he did so to fight by Earth's rules, a clear implication he had to lessen himself to fight the Darkstalkers fairly. You always do this, cut my argument in half and nit-pick what you can debate, and ignore what you cannot.
I'll concede this since I really could not care about this argument, the sun thing, considering to my knowledge they have not done that either.