Originally posted by ThunderGodEneru
1. I said you were making a completely baseless assumption and stating that Highfather could be stronger than Pyron. Which you were. Then you took my argument, and twisted it, bringing up a completely unrelated point, as if you refuted the point I just made, when in actuality you dodged the point completely. I'm not putting up with your bullshit anymore, you either prove your Goddamn claims, stfu and concede, or continue to make repetive BS posts and be immortalized as the most pitiful fallacious debater here. It's not exactly the same, I have logical reasoning behind my points, based on his size and the fact that he wears them as rings, of course Pyron can crush a planet. You have absolutely no evidence at all that Highfather is stronger than Pyron, other than he "could be." Well, Pyron COULD BE a galactic being who has devoured galaxies and can destroy the Milky Way with a single thought, but I could never prove it, hence why I never claim it. Because I am a logical thinker. You, are a speculative thinker, you base your arguments on assumptions, speculation, twisting of the opponent's words, and downright hypocrisy in order to "bully" the opponent out of the debate when they no longer want to deal with your ignorant BS. You yourself have made the claim when debating FOR Pyron that he can destroy planets with his bare hands...But when Pyron is the opposition's character, all of the sudden he can't! 😱 It's called a contradiction, and only cements you as a biased hypocrite.2. I made the claim that Pyron can eat planets. Then, to counter that, you state it has an "unknown charge time." I ask you to prove it has a charge time because he has never shown an indication in any fiction involving Pyron of needing one, so I was interested on how you came to the conclusion he has one at all. You, predictably, have not provided a grain of evidence for said claim, only stating that because he is "my character" I need to prove he does not. Debating doesn't work that way. The person who is asserting the positive or making the claim has to prove it, in this case, you did both, and by trying to force me to prove it, you only continue to commit the Burden of Proof fallacy. Trying to prove the sky is blue? Are you serious? There is no indication at all of Pyron needing to charge some super attack to devour planets, you are making an assumption he needs to, be a friggin man and concede on this, you obviously are not capable of proving it. Pyron moved to the left a little, then, he makes a right and is a star in the distance. So he changed direction. Did not go in a straight line, as the scan clearly demonstrates. And your next argument is as fallacious as your last. Now claiming Pyron somehow is not lightspeed? And quote me when I said he left the galaxy in that scan? You are committing so many fallacies I really don't even care to name them. Pyron, who was on the outskirts of the universe when he received the message from Phobos, then reached Earth in about three years. Which is much faster than light. And the Team Rocket example was for humorous effect(although it wore off in like the third episode), Team Rocket are ordinary humans, are you seriously comparing that to Pyron?
Why are you acting like there is three scans? There are two scans which show any real movement. The first showed him moving to the left, then he took a right and was a little bigger than a star in the sky. No proof of this ungodly slow accelleration you are claiming.
😐. He wears planets for rings. 😬
Ad Hominem. Not replying to anything I said, just insults. And before you say I made one too, I addressed your points, you did not address mine.
You need to read my fully posts. I am not so much disputing that he builds momentum, but your implication is that it is an ungodly amount he needs to build, which you have no basis for.
Could have? Sure, it COULD have a charge time, just like how Pyron COULD be 1,000 times bigger than the solar system or Pyron COULD be able to destroy a galaxy. I don't deal in could be's, your only foundation for that claim is a baseless act of desperation and personal opinion to refute my argument, while he COULD have a charge time, he has never shown to, yet we must assume he does? Fail logic is fail.
No, I'm really not.
3. In every debate you take place in mostly, like your current debate with DarkC for instance. Earth's rules is so obviously a metaphor it confounds to me that you do not get it, it is a metaphor for him lowering himself to their standards to make the battles less of a stomp in his favor.
I have nothing backing me? You are forming your own baseless opinions into something you would call an "argument" and placing them against my arguments supported by fact and logic, yet I am the one with nothing to back him? I loled.
Thats not an assumption, saying a character could be more powerful than another is not an assumption, its an opinion as soon as I say the word could, it means ime not actually making the statement. Also the evidence suggested is that High father would time rape Pyron anyway, its not baseless to say he could do so considering Nozmordu, a being blessed with but a fraction of Amanthuls power can do pretty impressive time feats, including seeing timelines, excisting in several time lines at once etc etc.
No its not corrupted or twisted at all, I simply changed the tables around to make you realise that saying Pyron can do things, not yet shown in his large form, is just as baseless as saying Amanthul can.
lmao, immortalised, in your mind V2D anyone who disagrees with you is either a fanboy, or a bad debator, when your the one shamefully saying ime wrong when ime simply using your own logic, thats when it shows YOU are the bad debator, nobody else.
No, Pyron couldnt be that, its not within the Darkstalkers powers nor Pyrons...so no, he couldnt..
No it cements me as a good debator, I let my opponent do the work they shoud be doing, even though I may use something I claim illegal in another thread, its one of my clever debating tactics, make someone else do the hard work, because I dont have to.....wheras you do...YOU have to prove Pyron can do things, and size is not everything, Pyron being bigger than a planet does not make him stronger or able to pummel it with ease.
2. I dont need to prove he has a charge time, I simply asked how fast he can do it, if you have no indication other than assumption at how fast, then the attack itself is worthless to you in this debate and any other...that is my point...
Pyron cannot move at full speed straight away fact as its shown by the scans, as i said, he could be a star in the distance from the beginning but no, he moves a couple of times, and fairly short distances before he is in the distance, which could indeed be only a short distance, no major, for all we know, he is still moving slowly. Its likely he can move lightspeed, just theres no actual evidence that ive seen for it, that scan certainly doesnt show it.
Where does it say he was on the outskirts, also does it state how big the universe actuall is in the DS universe, since scientists of today dont know how big our universe is exactley. Let me guess, your going to assume again? 🙄
Ime comparing effects, the fac ttheir human doesnt make a diffrence, the distane they must travel is whats important, your claiming that just because Pyron is in the distance in one of the posts that contitutes to lightspeed or? because Team rocket have the exact same effect, a little star in teh distance!
There is however proof of acceleration, he didnt just immediatley go super lightspeedzor! he had to start moving, which means hes not going to suddenly blitz anyone in this debate. Not that he could with Aman'Thul having such vast time powers.
err and how do you know how big those planets are? are you assuming again? do you actually know if he didnt transmute them to fit around his fingers like he supposedly transmuted them to go around his finger in the first place? no we dont...dont assume please..
Also what actually says their planets? I dont remember the scan saying so...
Erm no, you dont understand what "could" means do you, no, Pyron could have none of that at all....No my base for that claim is the fact you have no base for the claim its fast either, which makes the feat fortunatley useless to you....
3. my current debate with DarkC is not really a debate, all hes doing is assuming which according to you is wrong so ime not exactley going to reply to random assumptions, ime going to try and make a real debate out of it if he lets me. Does anything actually say that thats what the story means by Earths rules or are you simply making something up that sounds like it could be useful for your argument?
and your argument there is dashed immediatley, since he doesnt lower himself to their standards at all, how is fireing mini suns, nuclear punches and (according to you) unbreakable forcefields Earth standards? 🙄
Your just letting off hot air with those last comments, youve supported nothing factual, wheres your facts? you have none....simply assumptions based from scans that done back you up, much like how DarkC quote from the Halo book does not actually back up what he is claiming. Your falling in the same pit he is in, only thing is I thot you were better than that. My only goal is to debate against your assumptions, if that means making my own to mock yours then thats my point. You seem to think ime trying to prove he has a slow momentum or that ime trying to prove he has a slow cast time for planet absorbtion when thats not the case, ime simply enjoying stamping on your assumptions (same in the DarkC "debate"😉 so that your not running about trying to use abilities not actually shown to a degree not shown.