Thanos' willpower vs Darkseid's willpower

Started by King Kandy14 pages

Originally posted by Inhuman
The same writer that wrote the SG comic, later said in a she-hulk comic:
That Thano's clones have gotten so good that they even fool high level cosmics.
This was After the SG, watcher comic. Thus retconing it. 🙂

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=428398&highlight=squirrel+retcon+thanos

Thus making Thanos clones multiversal as well. 131

Looks like I've already had my say of the matter...

I don't understand why you hype Thanos in one thread and then do everything you can to discredit him in another.

Originally posted by King Kandy
I don't understand why you hype Thanos in one thread and then do everything you can to discredit him in another.
You got a pretty mouth boy. Lush. Fresh.

Mind telling me what you're talking about?

Originally posted by Air Legend
YOU need to stop cockriding Superman. Seriously, only an idiot would think Superman could save the omniverse on his lonesome.

The bullshit you're trying to pull ain't gonna work.

Funny...since Supes keeps on getting stronger and closer to his PC levels.

Originally posted by King Kandy
Nice I see in here bran says no one takes this sg seriously. I see even bran agrees with me. 😂

Originally posted by Superboy Prime
Funny...since Supes keeps on getting stronger and closer to his PC levels.
He looks more powerful but almost got beat by Kalibak and Mantis. 😂

He is nowhere near as powerful as he once was in those silly days.

Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist
My examples are as good as yours I feel... why must you bait me?
I am not baiting you but you and I know I am right here just try to be funny. You dont take this seriously imo and change your stance all the time it seems from the link I just saw.

What the shit are you prattling on about this time Quan?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Nice I see in here bran says no one takes this sg seriously. I see even bran agrees with me. 😂
So? Not only was that 1 and a half years ago (which would mean that you would agree with me, or my opinion might have changed), but that doesn't make it any less canon.

Originally posted by King Kandy
Yeah, you may not like it but the Squirrel Girl incident was a clone.
It makes perfect sense as Thanos doesnt run around and try to extinguish all life anymore. 😎

Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist
So? Not only was that 1 and a half years ago (which would mean that you would agree with me, or my opinion might have changed), but that doesn't make it any less canon.
No events have happened since then to change your mind. You just want to argue wit me but I know now deep down you agree with me. It isnt canon and I knew it the whole time. Common sense. 🙂

Originally posted by quanchi112
No events have happened since then to change your mind. You just want to argue wit me but I know now deep down you agree with me. It isnt canon and I knew it the whole time. Common sense. 🙂
What do/did I agree with? That she's silly? So?
I argued that it wasn't a clone. I argue now with your no stance, no support arguments that it's non-canon.

How exactly does anything said in this thread, or that thread make it non-canon?

See, that's the part I don't get about your "debating" if that's what you call it.

Alright...if all of Thanos' losses are gonna be attributed to clones...then...we can just go back to saying that all of Darkseid's losses were just avatars...which...in reality...they really were just avatars

Originally posted by Southern_Rebel
Alright...if all of Thanos' losses are gonna be attributed to clones...then...we can just go back to saying that all of Darkseid's losses were just avatars...which...in reality...they really were just avatars

Developed a liking to bringing up SG did you? 🙂

Originally posted by Southern_Rebel
Alright...if all of Thanos' losses are gonna be attributed to clones...then...we can just go back to saying that all of Darkseid's losses were just avatars...which...in reality...they really were just avatars

the loss to sg is the only time a clone has be suggested for thanos.
what darkseid avatar loss are you refering too?

Originally posted by LORD B
the loss to sg is the only time a clone has be suggested for thanos.
what darkseid avatar loss are you refering too?

I believe it was said that Darkseid's defeat at the hands of H/P Doomsday...was really just a DS avatar...and there are other instances where DS was foiled..and it was revealed that it was only a DS avatar..and not the real DS.

Originally posted by Southern_Rebel
I believe it was said that Darkseid's defeat at the hands of H/P Doomsday...was really just a DS avatar...and there are other instances where DS was foiled..and it was revealed that it was only a DS avatar..and not the real DS.

was it stated by a writer or is it a theory?
can you please provide scans of the suggestion of ds h/p doomsday avatar.

Originally posted by LORD B
was it stated by a writer or is it a theory?
can you please provide scans of the suggestion of ds h/p doomsday avatar.

alright...I'll look for them

The avatar retcon. Darkseid basically states he's never lost, but his avatars have. Technically, that's a retcon of all losses before this period. Because the others were previously retconned, though, the Doomsday thing is pretty much all this could apply to. Of course, some beleive he needs to spell out the battles in question for it to count. I guess people can judge for themselves:

http://img442.imageshack.us/my.php?...9jpgorig2ra.jpg

Originally posted by Southern_Rebel
The avatar retcon. Darkseid basically states he's never lost, but his avatars have. Technically, that's a retcon of all losses before this period. Because the others were previously retconned, though, the Doomsday thing is pretty much all this could apply to. Of course, some beleive he needs to spell out the battles in question for it to count. I guess people can judge for themselves:

http://img442.imageshack.us/my.php?...9jpgorig2ra.jpg


the link doesnt work.