Just For Kicks (END-GAME) Who Cares Enough To Watch And Comment?

Just for kicks I wanted to post this video in here because it has everything to do with the economy and the North American Union, ect.

I just want to see how many people on this board will actually take the time to watch this entire video, from start to finish, and then comment on what they thought about it.

It's more like an experiment. How many people will actually watch, even if they end up disagreeing with it. It's a little over 2 hours long (About the time it takes to watch any movie at a movie-theatre).

I understand that there will be instances where a person wants to watch but doesn't have a fast enough connection. In that case the person can either go to the local library to watch it, or an internet cafe for the day ($4-6 I think to watch the entire video). Not gonna break the bank.

So in the end, if 0 people from this board did not care enough to watch the video, than that's fine, I will still have learned alot from this experiment.

By the way, please let me know if the link is not working for someone. I will corrent the problem immediately.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1070329053600562261

I'm watching it as I type this. So far all I've seen is the same shit I read in the conspiracy forum, backed up only by random pieces of video, paraphrased purposefully to support the maker's point.

I saw this docu a few months ago. It is just another insane piece of work by an intelligent but delusional man.

Still watching it. So far - poor, very poor.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
I'm watching it as I type this. So far all I've seen is the same shit I read in the conspiracy forum, backed up only by random pieces of video, paraphrased purposefully to support the maker's point.

Ok but what scene in particular, or what part of the video do you find "shit"? I mean in terms of the detail or claims made in the video.? And why?

Originally posted by ragesRemorse
I saw this docu a few months ago. It is just another insane piece of work by an intelligent but delusional man.

Ok but what scene in particular, or what part of the video do you find "insane"? I mean in terms of the detail or claims made in the video.? And why?

This is a ridiculously biased documentary that has chosen anything it can from history and current events to support its claim. A similar documentary could be created in favour of virtually any preposterous theory. Also, it seems rather feeble to use historical trends to back up such a point, when rights of the individual have extended to a ridiculous amount since the periods mentioned; a fact that would seem to debunk the claim of the documentary.
The video you posted is nothing but a biased piece of shit which clutches at straws to hit home its point. They should have cut it down to an hour, perhaps even half an hour and only included parts where they made a good, strong argument for their case, actually maybe quarter of an hour.

Overall, this doesn't belong here, it belongs in the conspiracy forum (where you've already posted it a good few times).

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
This is a ridiculously biased documentary that has chosen anything it can from history and current events to support its claim. A similar documentary could be created in favour of virtually any preposterous theory. Also, it seems rather feeble to use historical trends to back up such a point, when rights of the individual have extended to a ridiculous amount since the periods mentioned; a fact that would seem to debunk the claim of the documentary.
The video you posted is nothing but a biased piece of shit which clutches at straws to hit home its point. They should have cut it down to an hour, perhaps even half an hour and only included parts where they made a good, strong argument for their case, actually maybe quarter of an hour.

Overall, this doesn't belong here, it belongs in the conspiracy forum (where you've already posted it a good few times).

So far we have 2 people who have watched this film. That I know of on this board. We have 112,826 members on this board.

Thanks for commenting as that was part of the title of this thread.

I think the most appropriate term is "convenient reverse engineering" of reality. What most conspiracy theories do is ignore the logical and profoundly obvious history of the reality around them.

I do believe in conspiracies, but most true conspiraies are lumped into the wholesale idea of "conspiracy", as pushed by the idea that interdimensional aliens are running the government or ancient humans were incapable of building something as magnificent as the pyramids. (We do truly dismiss the intelligence of our ancestors, and it's done much to our own detriment). Which is too bad, because the valid and plausible are dismissed, by association, with the unrealistic and implausible. Too many want to blame some amorphous super government or global conclave, when the reality is that all we have to do is follow the money to those who have it. I have no doubt that corporations, who already own the government, are capable of the most atrocious actions that have been motivated by money. But it's the disconnect between reality and obvious logic and its association with the implausible and absurd that keep the true conspiracies from coming to light.

Originally posted by NuclearWinter
So in the end, if 0 people from this board did not care enough to watch the video, than that's fine, I will still have learned alot from this experiment.

So we're your guinea pigs to determine how apathetic people are toward the economy? How pointless.

First, there's a large number of people here who aren't from North America and therefore have no vested interest in the video or topic.

Second, if you actually wanted to encourage discussion, you could provide a synopsis of ideas from the video, then still provide a link for those who wished to learn more. Instead, you've said "let's see how many people can sit through this video because I want to run a biased experiment that not only doesn't encourage discussion, but is inevitably set up for me to feel smug as dozens of people ignore the video compared to the few that do."

I'm going to report this thread for closing, because it's a condescending experiment for the benefit of one person, not a discussion topic.

Originally posted by NuclearWinter
So far we have 2 people who have watched this film. That I know of on this board. We have 112,826 members on this board.

Case in point.

Ron Paul '08?

Originally posted by NuclearWinter
So far we have 2 people who have watched this film. That I know of on this board. We have 112,826 members on this board.

Thanks for commenting as that was part of the title of this thread.

So you're not going to discuss my feelings on the topic, the one that you just started, even though I sat through that documentary? I thought the least I could get out of it was a debate, even a half arsed one with the likes of you.

You've earned yourself a report from me as well.

Originally posted by NuclearWinter
Just for kicks I wanted to post this video in here because it has everything to do with the economy and the North American Union, ect.

I just want to see how many people on this board will actually take the time to watch this entire video, from start to finish, and then comment on what they thought about it.

It's more like an experiment. How many people will actually watch, even if they end up disagreeing with it. It's a little over 2 hours long (About the time it takes to watch any movie at a movie-theatre).

I understand that there will be instances where a person wants to watch but doesn't have a fast enough connection. In that case the person can either go to the local library to watch it, or an internet cafe for the day ($4-6 I think to watch the entire video). Not gonna break the bank.

So in the end, if 0 people from this board did not care enough to watch the video, than that's fine, I will still have learned alot from this experiment.

By the way, please let me know if the link is not working for someone. I will corrent the problem immediately.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1070329053600562261

Read the title. Decided it was primed to manipulate the weak willed via shock value. Didn't watch it.

What do I win?

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Read the title. Decided it was primed to manipulate the weak willed via shock value. Didn't watch it.

What do I win?

Primed nothin. The experiment is going exactly as planned, which is that I had no clue as to what the outcome would be.

So far...it has been very interesting for me to see what has transpired.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25yhygUkecE (Part 1)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9XMu2UrSX0&feature=related (Part 2)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F59cMimOmiE&feature=related (Part 3)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKYWs9sZ36M&feature=related (Part 4)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VULQziRL80&feature=related (Part 5)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqN60p7niH4&feature=related (Part 6)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTRToKbqy00&feature=related (Part 7)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CL-lB_Nk08U&feature=related (Part 8)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9s_GbRna8M&feature=related (Part 9)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fj8DmxS1etE&feature=related (Part 10)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=co7aIx85rWg&feature=related (Part 11)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_M16LzbYeY&feature=related (12)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vrgMyAAj0o&feature=related (13)

This broken up version is for those with a slower connection.

Reported...again.

Youtube is a lazy resource for those who share your opinion. I recently saw a video of a guy popping an enormous zit on his back.

What reason is there to report him, other than posting his thread in the wrong forum?

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Reported...again.

This broken up version is for those with a slower connection.

Originally posted by Devil King
Youtube is a lazy resource for those who share your opinion. I recently saw a video of a guy popping an enormous zit on his back.

What reason is there to report him, other than posting his thread in the wrong forum?

Devil...thats fine. But you wrote a pretty good description of why you disagreed with the film. Thats what this thread was about. Whether people agree or disagree with it (After they watched it) and Why.

Not about people popping zits on their backs. Has nothing to do with this video.

You've posted both videos in the the conspiracy forum, where they should have been in the first place already. You've then admitted that this thread is not intended for discussion purposes, when it's in the GDF. I believe that deserves reporting.