Just For Kicks (END-GAME) Who Cares Enough To Watch And Comment?

Started by NuclearWinter3 pages
Originally posted by jaden101
im watching it...doing it in the broken up version though cause it is helluva long and it really is a bit of an ask 2 hav people watch it in one sitting...it'll probably take me a week or so to get through it...

Well at least your watching it. Thats all I was asking people to do. Thanks for taking the time though. I guess I forgot how many people still have dialup.

Originally posted by DigiMark007
That's because you're a tool.

Also, lulz at thinking people get upst over internet forum stuff. We just point out idiocy when we see it.

Mod or not you can kiss my ass. You're the tool. Or maybe you just don't care. Either way, get bent.

2 hours and 15 minutes?

You can't pay me to watch some ass flap talking about a conspiracy. 😐

Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist
2 hours and 15 minutes?

You can't pay me to watch some ass flap talking about a conspiracy. 😐

Slippy, either watch it or don't watch it but please, save the sob story for someone who cares.

Originally posted by NuclearWinter
Slippy, either watch it or don't watch it but please, save the sob story for someone who cares.
You care enough to respond to my post... srug

Sob story? You expect to put up a two hour video, and not expect people to b*tch? Eh?

This is a good point.

However if it makes you feel better I watched the film kinda sorta half/skimmed through the first two minutes then went to jungle-bunnies . com.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
This is a ridiculously biased documentary that has chosen anything it can from history and current events to support its claim. A similar documentary could be created in favour of virtually any preposterous theory. Also, it seems rather feeble to use historical trends to back up such a point, when rights of the individual have extended to a ridiculous amount since the periods mentioned; a fact that would seem to debunk the claim of the documentary.
The video you posted is nothing but a biased piece of shit which clutches at straws to hit home its point. They should have cut it down to an hour, perhaps even half an hour and only included parts where they made a good, strong argument for their case, actually maybe quarter of an hour.

Overall, this doesn't belong here, it belongs in the conspiracy forum (where you've already posted it a good few times).

Are you going to discuss my points, or carry on fannying about?

it takes things from history to show that things never change when it comes to goverments. why do you have it in your head that we are the good guys and that we can never do such evil things to advance agendas?

I don't have that in my head at all. Despite what you may think, I do think there are conspiracies out there. However, I don't think these conspiracies are all inter related with the idea of total government control. I believe the conspiracies that are prevalent in society, are those where an individual has messed up, (a high ranking individual that is) and societies and governments have covered up any errors to make it look like an external issue. Now that sort of conspiracy wouldn't surprise me at all, I just don't think that there's an ambition to have one world government.

The idea that you can make a point drawing on past governments is ridiculous, any point that can be made can be thwarted by the fact that, whether you like it or not, freedom of the individual is far more important and widespread in societies today than ever before.

My buddy is a security guard, and he partner is in his 70's. Out of the blue, the old timer started talking about the North American Union at work one day. I suppose the word is spreading.

So?

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
So?

Hmmm... I see what you mean, so indeed.