Here is a video of the Military preparing for a martial law scenario, where they will have the ability to basicly beat and arrest whoever is resisting them whatsoever:
Here is a video of the Military preparing for a martial law scenario, where they will have the ability to basicly beat and arrest whoever is resisting them whatsoever:
Very good video on Bush's power grab and his dictatorial powers that he has now given to whoever is the President of the United States:
Well here we go folks, they are steeming ahead with their plans for the trains. You saw the camp video folks, the camps are being built right next to the train tracks. And now we have FEMA coming out directly and stating that they are planning up increasing the use of trains for the next "disaster" that hits the United States, whatever that "disaster" may be. Whether it be man-made or nature made.
But you know what, I think they really mean, in the event of Martial Law being declared during one of these "emergency situations".
Here are the recently released news articles which show PROOF that FEMA is planning to use massive amounts of trains for the next "disaster" outbreak:
http://www.examiner.com/a-1215440~FEMA_Looks_at_Trains_for_Evacautions.html - Los Angeles Examiner Article
http://www.kltv.com/Global/story.asp?S=7856418&nav=menu117_2_1 - KLTV 7 News Article
http://www.wkyc.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=83188 - WKYC News Article
http://www.wtoctv.com/Global/story.asp?S=7859407&nav=0qq64h3l - WTOCTV News Article
Well I'm not buying it at all. I think this is a nightmare scenario.
Trains for the sick and elderly? Lol. Are you serious? FEMA didn't do squat when the sick and elderly were drowning and dying in their wheelchairs during that hellish week of Huricane Katrina. Do you people really believe that FEMA is a loving, fuzzy, cuddly organization that cares so much about the sick and the elderly? For crying out loud they are now tied into the United States Department of Defense!
And another thing, the amount of train cars being built, and the amount of trains being built, can hold WAY WAY more people in them than just the sick and the elderly. Whats all the extra space for? Hmmm...could it be MORE people?
And where are these trains going to bring the people that are filled with them? Are they going to cruise past a homeless shelter and drop them off? lol. Hell no. There aren't even enough Homeless shelters to hold them all. Are they going to drop them in other cities? Yeah right. The cities that they were dropped in would be filled to it's maximum capacity, and the economy of that cities would be strained with all the new people to feed and clothe. So thats not going to happen.
Hmmm....so what does that leave us with folks? Can we say, The over 800 FEMA concentration camps that can hold millions of people in total? Can we say, the same camps from the same videos I posted that are located RIGHT NEXT TO the train tracks?
I'm telling you what. There is no way in hell I'm getting on any FEMA train, and going to any camp where they are going to hold me "indefinately". F-ck that.
Straight from the article:
NEW ORLEANS (AP) - The Federal Emergency Management Agency may expand the use of passenger trains to evacuate the sick and elderly in advance of hurricanes across the Gulf Coast, a FEMA official said.
Glenn Cannon, a FEMA assistant administrator, told a congressional subcommittee meeting in New Orleans on Monday that his agency is looking at passenger trains as a method of getting people out of harm's way.
After Hurricane Katrina hit in August 2005, Amtrak was hired to be on hand to evacuate people if another disaster hit.
And then there is this very worrysome statement:
But, he said, turning railways into evacuation routes won't be easy.
Rights of way for most railroads are privately owned by freight companies, and there is no congressional mandate to use railroads for evacuations. Also, the existing stock of passenger cars cannot accommodate evacuees unable to walk, he said.
So what does that mean? Hmmm..does that mean that FEMA and/or the President and/or congress is going to physically change the laws so that they can take posession of most railways in our country for their own purposes? VERY, VERY, Scary folks.
Please look at this with an open mind and open EYES folks. We need to do something. It's all coming into fruition, and if we don't do anything we're going to be screwed in the end.
The mind is like a parachute folks. It works better when it's open.
Here is a video of the military going from house to house and disarming the population in New Orleans. In the video, they are using the "threat" of force, to get people out of their homes and to do what the military tells them to do:
Here is a video of George W. Bush having Alex Jones arrested for asking him questions about the CFR, the Federal Reserve, ect. Look at the smirk on George Bush's face as he gives the nod to have Alex arrested:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoyn_doplUM&feature=related
What ever happened to "Freedom of Speech"?
This video is full of amazing points about the freedoms of America being trampled upon:
Former President George H. W. Bush calls out for a New World Order:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pw1ZlyqASX8&feature=related
Former President George H. W. Bush states that the "Rule of Law" is part of the New World Order and that it will prevail in all nations:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGNQ5QfZJBw&feature=related
Former President George H. W. Bush says that Ronald Reagan helped the plans for a New World Order:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLlQxVpeHHs&feature=related
Former President Bill Clinton says that we need a New World Order in this country:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzUkhKaNylM&feature=related
Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIhC6lXoTls&feature=related
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown admits plan for a New World Order and Globalization (One World Government):
you refer to them as concentration camps and you post lots of youtube videos...i want you to watch these
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Qt1tu4igqnk
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=pJcZz4pLGNc&feature=related
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=BazGGwrDotg&feature=related
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=mUfHrYcBqKM&feature=related
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=BCVBlugadrY&feature=related
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=7IYVkJCfPwc&feature=related
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=FoUw8U5EQrQ&feature=related
there's a part missing..and it's in french...but you dont need subtitles...believe me
Or you can watch this video Jaden,
C-SPAN video of Congress being kept away from the truth about George Bush's so called "Emergency Plans". These are the same plans in connection with FEMA and FEMA's Concentration Camps:
There is the The Act of August 29, 1916, which authorizes the Secretary of the Army, in time of war, to take possession of any transportation system for transporting troops, material, or any other purpose related to the emergency:
http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/49C605.txt
FEMA's powers were consolidated by President Carter to incorporate: The National Security Act of 1947, which allows for the strategic relocation of industries, services, government and other essential economic activities, and to rationalize the requirements for manpower, resources and production facilities.
http://www.intelligence.gov/0-natsecact_1947.shtml - Unclassified National Security Act of 1947 Document
The 1950 Defense Production Act, which gives the President sweeping powers over many aspects of the economy:
http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=6537754
And then there is The International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which enables the President to seize the property of a foreign country or national. These powers were transferred to FEMA in a sweeping consolidation in 1979:
http://www.treas.gov/offices/enforcement/ofac/legal/statutes/ieepa.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Emergency_Economic_Powers_Act
From the wikipedia article:
The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) is a United States federal law allowing U.S. Presidents to identify any unusual extraordinary threat that originates outside the United States and to confiscate property and prohibit transactions in response. In the United States Code the IEEPA is Title 50, sections 1701-1707.
And then of course we have The John Warner Defense Act of 2007 passed easily at the end of September 2006, authorizing the expenditure of $526 billion for fiscal year 2007. Only 23 U.S. representatives voted against the Act, and not a single senator objected during a unanimous voice vote. Section 1076 of the Act Changed the title of the law from "Insurrection Act" to "Enforcement of the Laws to Restore Public Order Act".
Specifies situations in which the President can invoke martial law (natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident or other condition in which the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to the extent that state officials cannot maintain public order). These had not been specified before.
Here is an official press release about the Act:
http://armed-services.senate.gov/press/Conference%2007%20Press%20Release.pdf
Here is the Wikipedia description of the act:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.R._5122_(2006)
Wikipedia states:
H.R. 5122, also known as the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 was a bill passed in the United States Congress on September 30, 2006 and signed by President George W. Bush on October 17, 2006. Among other things, it includes:
$500 billion allocated to the military and defense related activities for fiscal year 2007
Expansion of the President's power to declare martial law under revisions to the Insurrection Act, and take charge of United States National Guard troops without state governor authorization when public order has been lost and the state and its constituted authorities cannot enforce the law.
There is the The Act of August 29, 1916, which authorizes the Secretary of the Army, in time of war, to take possession of any transportation system for transporting troops, material, or any other purpose related to the emergency:
times it's been used?...ww2 to transport troops across the atlantic
Expansion of the President's power to declare martial law under revisions to the Insurrection Act, and take charge of United States National Guard troops without state governor authorization when public order has been lost and the state and its constituted authorities cannot enforce the law.
why is only some of that highlighted and not the rest?...trying to portray skewed information?
The prevention of thougtcrimes bill that passed through the House and is now in the Senate:
http://cryptome.org/1984update.htm
And this little lovely intent to restructure the government, straight from the white house
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html
Nat Hentoff (born June 10, 1925) is an American historian, novelist, and columnist for the Village Voice, Legal Times, Washington Times, The Progressive, Editor & Publisher, Free Inquiry and Jewish World Review.
Nat Hentoff received his B.A. with the highest honors from Northeastern University and did graduate work at Harvard. He was a Fulbright fellow at the Sorbonne in Paris in 1950. From 1953 through 1957 he was associate editor of Down Beat magazine. He was awarded a Guggenheim Fellowship in education and an American Bar Association Silver Gavel Award in 1980 for his coverage of the law and criminal justice in his columns. In 1985 he was awarded an honorary Doctorate of Laws by Northeastern University.
Here is an article by Nat Hentoff in the Village Voice in which he also outlines General Ashcroft's plans for Detention Camps in the United States:
http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0236,hentoff,38006,6.html
In the article, Hentoff states:
"Now more Americans are also going to be dispossessed of every fundamental legal right in our system of justice and put into camps."
Here is more info about Nat Hentoff:
Just recently, (last 1.5 years) it was changed to now the President has total control over the National Guard in each state. That is, to say, that the Governors can't say no.
http://www.stateline.org/live/details/story?contentId=170453