It wouldn't bother me how many kids she had, as long as she could provide for them, however, it seems she isn't doing that. Her mum is out cleaning houses to take of her daughter and grandchildren. I imagine it would be difficult to find a daycare for them all, but surely something is available, because it seems this kid is quite happy sitting at home churning out kids while mum slaves away to feed them all.
Originally posted by chillmeistergenCan't prove a negative. 🙂 So that means burden of proof is on your shoulders.
She may well have fully intended to conceive, prove to me that she didn't
Originally posted by chillmeistergenWhich just exacerbates the conundrum.
and I will agree that it was a mistake. Don't forget that she's given birth to two sets of triplets, not 7 kids individually.
Originally posted by chillmeistergenI'm using the word as it's defined. You're the one that's trying to change a meaning of a word. 🙂
You entering definitions doesn't really change anything, as this is a specific, contextual usage of the word.
Originally posted by chithappensNo I didn't. 🙂 Guess that means that you can't make a rational observation of me or my opinion because you lack that certain bit of knowledge. Read back where Lana tried to imply I was placing all the blame on the girl.
If you do not have some sort of previous knowledge of an individual background, it is impossible to not seem like a dictative prick.At the very least, after someone knows a decent amount about said subject, they can make rational observations. You have blindly just said that it is all her fault.
Originally posted by chithappensSo you're saying that she made a mistake by having sex at such a young age?
In the blog she is considered to be "promiscuous." They say she had a miscarriage and so on, but why is she having sex at a young age?It is very simple to say that one should learn from mistakes and not repeat the exact same thing. Some are rather stupid and make no sense:
Originally posted by chithappensLike I care. Not like my words are ever going to reach her.
Example: Kelvin Sampson gets excused as basketball coach of Indiana University for making too many phone calls to recruits. Before this happened he was already under a penalty from the NCAA for the EXACT SAME problem (making too many phone calls to recruits). Now this is an example of a very irrational decision making process.Now in a different scenario, let's say someone is a two-time felon from the projects. You let him out of prison and tell him he has one more chance (Three Strikes program). He goes out and does the same sort of crimes. He might honestly want to stop and clean himself up, but influence plays a lot into how we handle different situations.
People all influence each other and offer either a negative or positive charge to the current paradigm an individual holds. We gauge what we see as moral or immoral based on these charges.
As mentioned earlier, anal sex is not considered "ok." Now more people do it than I think most realize, but the point is that there is no objective maxim to base "anal sex is wrong" on. This is part of the paradigm of the masses. This does not even mean that people base their actions on their morals (that is emotion) but I won't go there unless someone takes it there later.
I conclude by saying that without some real background information, what you said was unfair and bias.
Originally posted by chithappensThe whole sympatize with them thing? No I think I'd still consider it a mistake.
You may not agree with the situations a person has in their lives, but understanding how a person reaches those circumstances is important to the entire process of rational thought.
Some people do things that are bad intentionally. The fact that they intended the outcome doesn't change the fact it was a mistake.
Originally posted by King KandyBy judging him and saying he is judgemental you are doing that which you are critisizing him for.
No not really. He was judgemental. He fits the definition, there is nothing hypocritical here.
Doing that which you critisize him for is hypocritical.
He judges the girl. You judge him for judgeing the girl. You are being hypocritical.
🙂
So I was going through a website about hip-hop and came across this:
Took me a long time to get that far
Originally posted by JacopeXI totally agree, poor people really shouldn't get children.
http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2008/02/in-argentina-16.htmlI find this very sad and following my rantings on how youth is going to the shit, I think I have made my point easily. Here is some advice you whore, keep your legs closed and adopt all your children. You have alot more to live for!
Originally posted by Creshosk
Can't prove a negative. 🙂 So that means burden of proof is on your shoulders.Which just exacerbates the conundrum.
I'm using the word as it's defined. You're the one that's trying to change a meaning of a word. 🙂
I don't have to prove anything, I'm the one who's saying we shouldn't assume anything, I'm not assuming that she intended to conceive or not and I don't really care either way.
When a mistake is in inherent to a conscious decision your definition doesn't really mean anything, does it? Your definition would imply that she slipped over and fell on a cock, which then ejaculated and impregnated her.
I can tell you're never going to get the point, so for once I'm going to leave it. If I didn't know you were a stupid **** and always have been, I would have thought you were InneRise's sock.
Originally posted by chillmeistergenYou're the one that's saying that I shouldn't say it was a mistake. ergo, she intended to have the kids.
I don't have to prove anything, I'm the one who's saying we shouldn't assume anything, I'm not assuming that she intended to conceive or not and
Originally posted by chillmeistergenIf this were true you wouldn't be posting about it.
I don't really care either way.
Originally posted by chillmeistergenIt's not MY definition. its THE definition. And yeah it does.
When a mistake is in inherent to a conscious decision your definition doesn't really mean anything, does it?
Originally posted by chillmeistergenNope. My definition says that it was a bad desicion on her part.
Your definition would imply that she slipped over and fell on a cock, which then ejaculated and impregnated her.
Originally posted by chillmeistergenYeah, I don't get bad logic.
I can tell you're never going to get the point,
Originally posted by chillmeistergenReported. 🙂
so for once I'm going to leave it. If I didn't know you were a stupid **** and always have been, I would have thought you were InneRise's sock.
Man I swear if it were up to most the people in this thread no one would ever have any accountability.
Guess what, if she didn't know the consequences of sex that is her problem. I doubt she thought she was dropped off by a damn stork to her parents. Now if it was the guy who raped her , then I'll feel bad for her. But I am going by the information given. Of course he is still a piece of shit for bailing on her, I am not forgetting that whatsoever.
Damn...most of you people make it too easy for ignorant people to justify their decisions. Let's all blame everything on something else or someone else and make excuses for each other. That will make the world just grand.
Originally posted by PezmergaWhat exactly do you mean?
Man I swear if it were up to most the people in this thread no one would ever have any accountability.
Guess what, if she didn't know the consequences of sex that is her problem. I doubt she thought she was dropped off by a damn stork to her parents. Now if it was the guy who raped her , then I'll feel bad for her. But I am going by the information given. Of course he is still a piece of shit for bailing on her, I am not forgetting that whatsoever.
Damn...most of you people make it too easy for ignorant people to justify their decisions. Let's all blame everything on something else or someone else and make excuses for each other. That will make the world just grand.
Originally posted by JacopeX
http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2008/02/in-argentina-16.htmlI find this very sad and following my rantings on how youth is going to the shit, I think I have made my point easily. Here is some advice you whore, keep your legs closed and adopt all your children. You have alot more to live for!
There is a word for this situation.....
*looks through BRAIN-DICTIONARY*
...Ah, yes. Sterilization.
Originally posted by Bardock42
I guess. I suppose we can start once you fully elaborated in your point. What excuses do you mean? And what is your conclusion?
I'm not going to go through every post and find examples lol. Mainly the fact that people are implying imo that since she is young she isn't accountable for her mistakes. I might have over reacted a bit, but it just irritates me.
Regardless, let's hope that someone teaches her 7 children to wait until they are capable of raising children before they have one...nevermind 7.