Queeq: Please play childminder here and remind JAC that I asked if he would resurrect the argument in the thread it belongs in, cheers.
JAC: I appreciate that you have taken the time to realise that there is no absolute answer for the question you posed. Realise, however, that there are questions relevant to that discussion which you failed to answer or acknowledge in anyway - whereas I had the proof in ambudance for those questions, which shed light on the discussion and thus give, while not a definitive answer to the problem, a relatively sound solution. Open up the thread if ya want to talk silly.