So, what is the appicable end result of people saying that the US pays so much less for gas and start wars to keep prices less than 4 to 7 pounds a gallon when the exchange rate of the US dollar v the British Pound is 2 to 1?
And there is no arguing that the pound was worth more than the dollar when the US was paying a buck-forty a gallon. It still is. The pound has long been worth more than the dollar, and the UK has always paid far, far more for gas than we have. How many members of the British PM club have been placed in office by the oil industry and have produced such hugely successful results for his actual constituants?
It, in reality, comes across as total graphical justification for starting wars to keep that gallon of gas affordable to the average American. The problem now is that it simply ****ing isn't! We no longer have an interest in the middle east that doesn't revolve around monopolizing it's product, whihc means the wholesale dismissal of every other nation's progress. Spread freedom and democracy much? when does freedom and democracy, as principles, count more than the freedom and democracy of a single nation.
How can anyone argue that a world made of hundreds of democratic nations is flawed concept when they are examined through the truth of a single human casting a vote that doesn't serve the betterment of humanity and ignores the fact that no single human being casts an informed or interest-free vote? democracy only works when the whole world is democratic, as does communism, as does socialism.