Originally posted by Impediment
I was gonna go see this movie today, but I decided to just veg out at the house alone.
bates?
😆
oh...and...
Reported to Bardock42 for talking about your personal life in the movie discussion forum.
Originally posted by Mindship
This is what I deserve for...
1 ... waiting more than a week to see the movie (anti-crowd measure); and,
2 ... not reading the whole thread.bag
lol, dude, I was being an ass. You don't have to justify yourself to a jerk. 😆
Seriously, though. It was a nice lead into for the Samuel Sterns Character. 🙂
you should, it needs all the help it can get at the box office. For some reason, people aren't going to see this movie. Considering the quality of the movie and that fans were given eveything they asked for after watching the first Hulk movie. Im surprised that it is not doing much better than Ang lee's movie.
Originally posted by ragesRemorse
you should, it needs all the help it can get at the box office. For some reason, people aren't going to see this movie. Considering the quality of the movie and that fans were given eveything they asked for after watching the first Hulk movie. Im surprised that it is not doing much better than Ang lee's movie.
Well, I hate to be a party pooper, but Ang Lee's wasn't that bad at all. There's a reason it did fine at the box office.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I've never understood why they can't tell Hulk's origin as it happens in the comics, but besides that, I don't think Leterrier did a lot wrong.-AC
I believe (read) that Norton and him decided that the whole gamma bomb thing was a bit outdated. They also wanted to tribute Bixby, though they did repeatedly
Originally posted by ragesRemorse
I'm not saying it was bad. I enjoy the Ang lee version, but this version did everything the first one didn't and did it well.
I wasn't contradicting you, bro. Just being a party pooper because most people I know have a disdain for the Ang Lee version. I apologize if I came off like that.