Blade vs. Ironfist

Started by Master-Borg13 pages

Originally posted by Battlehammer
in hulk 340.

in wolverine vs hulk issue 8 skrull wolverine beat hulk.

wolverine as death could have killed hulk, but regained enough controll to stop himself.

skrull wolverine doesnt count

death wolverine doesn't count

so when did regular Wolverine beat Hulk again? and are you misinterpreting it...cuz I dont remember anyone ever saying Logan having beat Hulk.

Originally posted by Master-Borg
skrull wolverine doesnt count

death wolverine doesn't count

so when did regular Wolverine beat Hulk again? and are you misinterpreting it...cuz I dont remember anyone ever saying Logan having beat Hulk.

In hulk 340 Logan KO hulk.

how does death wolverine not count? He wolverine only under apoc control. so actaully it does count.

No I not misrepresenting anything Logan KO the Hulk in 340.

and as death he almost killed Hulk.

also not sure why skrull wolverine does not count ( he was a weaker version of the real wolverine)

Originally posted by Battlehammer
In hulk 340 Logan KO hulk.

how in the hell does Wolverine KO hulk? did he get a 100 ton amp that I missed? 😕

or was it PIS?

Originally posted by Master-Borg
how in the hell does Wolverine KO hulk? did he get a 100 ton amp that I missed? 😕

or was it PIS?

Logan went berserker and stabbed him through the chest badly. Hulk was dropped to the ground KO. Hulk did however get back up after a few pannels to resume the fight. But according to kmc rules a KO is a win.

I love how you argue this but your completely fine with Blade beating dracula.............

Originally posted by Battlehammer
Logan went berserker and stabbed him through the chest badly. Hulk was dropped to the ground KO. Hulk did however get back up after a few pannels to resume the fight. But according to kmc rules a KO is a win.

I love how you argue this but your completely fine with Blade beating dracula.............

yeah...funny how its not funny at all

Dracula is not nearly as formidable as Hulk

also, that seems like pretty bad PIS...Hulk gets KOed from a stab in the chest wtf did the writer forget his super HF? Hulk's taken much worse without even blinking.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
Logan went berserker and stabbed him through the chest badly. Hulk was dropped to the ground KO. Hulk did however get back up after a few pannels to resume the fight. But according to kmc rules a KO is a win.

I love how you argue this but your completely fine with Blade beating dracula.............

I love your double standard...its so obvious too.

When WOlverine gets KOed by certain attacks, you call PIS since his HF is too strong.

But when Hulk gets Koed by a stab to the chest, you use that as evidence.

Please stop being so biased.

Originally posted by Master-Borg
yeah...funny how its not funny at all

what ar eyou babling about?

Originally posted by Master-Borg
Dracula is not nearly as formidable as Hulk

really tell that to silver surfer.

Originally posted by Master-Borg
also, that seems like pretty bad PIS...Hulk gets KOed from a stab in the chest wtf did the writer forget his super HF? Hulk's taken much worse without even blinking.

Think what you want I really don't care.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
................thats awful logic.

Logan beaten hulk, herc ect. Fought pheonix, beat a clone of Appoc ect.

just becauses blade beat drac is an awful reason to assume he going to give wolverine trouble.

It wasn't even the same Dracual really.

Originally posted by Battlehammer

Think what you want I really don't care.

how persuasive. you know you agree with me that Hulk shouldn't have been KOed from a stab to the chest.

Originally posted by Master-Borg
I love your double standard...its so obvious too.

When WOlverine gets KOed by certain attacks, you call PIS since his HF is too strong.

But when Hulk gets Koed by a stab to the chest, you use that as evidence.

Please stop being so biased.

LOL are you an idiot. I not being bias at all. I showing you how rediculous your being.

Your using one rediculous showing of blade beationg drac as evidences of him giivng wolveirne trouble.

SO I gave you reiduclous showings of wolverine taking and beating character he should not think it might snap some senses into you, but of courses it does not.

Bother characters have there rediculous showings and to uses one and not the others is bias and simp;ly wrong.

If your going to uses Blade top showings as evidences of him beaing able to handle Logan, then you can not ignore Logans high shows.

But in reality both are pis and should be ignored for the debate.

also if any ones being bias it you.

Originally posted by Master-Borg
skrull wolverine doesnt count

Why not? Because it proves that someone with Wolverine's powers (to a lesser degree) but without his experience could take a fight to Hulk?

Originally posted by Master-Borg
death wolverine doesn't count

Why not?

Originally posted by Master-Borg
so when did regular Wolverine beat Hulk again? and are you misinterpreting it...cuz I dont remember anyone ever saying Logan having beat Hulk.

Hulk 340 by one hit KO.

Originally posted by Master-Borg
how in the hell does Wolverine KO hulk? did he get a 100 ton amp that I missed? 😕

or was it PIS?

By stabbing the living shit ouf him before Hulk's HF really got going? 😕

Originally posted by Master-Borg
how persuasive. you know you agree with me that Hulk shouldn't have been KOed from a stab to the chest.

I know I agree with you that your an idiot who fallows me around.

Originally posted by Master-Borg
I love your double standard...its so obvious too.

When WOlverine gets KOed by certain attacks, you call PIS since his HF is too strong.

But when Hulk gets Koed by a stab to the chest, you use that as evidence.

Please stop being so biased.

Grey Hulk's HF was impressive but he's not exactly the type to stand there as a pire of bones unweathered... It wasn't PIS it just wasn't the most uber version of Hulk. 😬

Originally posted by jinzin
Why not? Because it proves that someone with Wolverine's powers (to a lesser degree) but without his experience could take a fight to Hulk?

Why not?

Hulk 340 by one hit KO.

1. skrull wolverine is a skrull, not wolverine

2. death wolverine was under control by apoc...who may have made logan better than he is (look what Apoc did with Hulk)

3. Hulk getting KOed by claws is PIS, no way to spin it. Even gray hulk should not get KOed by claws.

Originally posted by Master-Borg
1. skrull wolverine is a skrull, not wolverine

He's a skrull with all of Wolverine's powers and recorded memories.
He didn't have Logan's training, heightened senses, nor HF at Logan's real level so he only goes to prove that Logan would fair better than himself. 😬

Originally posted by Master-Borg
2. death wolverine was under control by apoc...who may have made logan better than he is (look what Apoc did with Hulk)

If by better you mean he gave Wolverine his adamantium skeleton back then yeah he did... But no other upgrades where EVER stated to be given to Logan (Hulks were stated), and I challenge you to prove otherwise.

Likewise, IF Wolverine had upgrades from being Death, when were they taken away?
It's a suitable example. Get over it.

Originally posted by Master-Borg
3. Hulk getting KOed by claws is PIS, no way to spin it. Even gray hulk should not get KOed by claws.
😬
Grey Hulk's been dazed by a Spiderman boot to the face. Wolverine stabbed him through the chest and Hulk went down for a few seconds KOed there's nothing wrong with that.
Even with Wolverine's HF the way it's been in recent years having his heart stabbed/ripped out put him down....and it should.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
In hulk 340 Logan KO hulk.

how does death wolverine not count? He wolverine only under apoc control. so actaully it does count.

No I not misrepresenting anything Logan KO the Hulk in 340.

and as death he almost killed Hulk.

also not sure why skrull wolverine does not count ( he was a weaker version of the real wolverine)

DO you have scans? I'd really like to see that (not sarcasm)

Originally posted by Battlehammer
LOL are you an idiot. I not being bias at all. I showing you how rediculous your being.

Your using one rediculous showing of blade beationg drac as evidences of him giivng wolveirne trouble.

SO I gave you reiduclous showings of wolverine taking and beating character he should not think it might snap some senses into you, but of courses it does not.

Bother characters have there rediculous showings and to uses one and not the others is bias and simp;ly wrong.

If your going to uses Blade top showings as evidences of him beaing able to handle Logan, then you can not ignore Logans high shows.

But in reality both are pis and should be ignored for the debate.

also if any ones being bias it you.

hasn't blade beaten dracula on multiple occasions?

Originally posted by DestinyGuy678
DO you have scans? I'd really like to see that (not sarcasm)

no scanner. sorry

Originally posted by DestinyGuy678
hasn't blade beaten dracula on multiple occasions?

only onces I believe .