Blade vs. Ironfist

Originally posted by DestinyGuy678
I have a lot of wolverine comics thats the most I have I think (second being black panther) and from what I've seen in blades respect thread wolverine isn't as strong or as fast as blade, his healing factor is AMAZING though

but possibly there are older feats I havent seen

anyway this strays from blade vs. ironfist, not much evidence has been provided in defence of the ironfist side

Originally posted by Battlehammer
Danny wins this the vast majority.

hahahahaha the way you overrate blade in astounding.

Oh, and a little off topic but in a recent issue of Marvel Comics Presents Blade was seen standing in flames after he snuck into a Korean nuclear facility and killed a scientist following that up by blowing up the whole joint. In his words he was just having a BBQ.

........................not really all that impressess.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
hahahahaha the way you overrate blade in astounding.

you dont seem to much about him to say we overate him, he isn't being any more overated than wolverine or ironfist simply because they are more popular

Originally posted by Battlehammer
also says nothing about him not having it.

also states he ahs magnitude durability.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
...............strong yes, faster no.

Vampire spiderman means crap. He was a blood lusted morron. It hold more weight if he beat the real deal which Logan has done.

Blade beat vampire spiderman who an idiot.

Logan beat normal Spiderman who intellegent.

wonder which feats better?

vampire spiderman = faster/stronger/bloodlusted, nothing to pove he was any less intelligent

Originally posted by DestinyGuy678
super strength isnt a part of his mutation, if it isnt listed as one of his powers yo ucant give it to him

Actaully it is part of his power set just becuases your ignorant does not change that.

Weapon X novel clearly states he has inhuman strength.

Thats just one of many sources.

Originally posted by DestinyGuy678
vampire spiderman = faster/stronger/bloodlusted, nothing to pove he was any less intelligent

............are you kidding me? He acted like a complete idiot. he did not think a single o ne of his action through and simply attacked.

porve that he faster or stronger. Nothing in the issue suggested so.

Originally posted by DestinyGuy678
super strength isnt a part of his mutation, if it isnt listed as one of his powers yo ucant give it to him

He HAS been credited with superhuman strength in biographies and comics on multiple occasions.

He HAS been credited with peak human strength in biographies on multiple occasions.

His strength HAS been omitted from biographies and comics on multiple occasions.

However, as I previously mentioned; the most primary source overrides any secondary source.

In the comics, Wolverine has thrown a full sized dumpster one handed, lifted six men one handed, held an elevator, and performed a variety of other strength feats. He's very easily one ton.

I emailed somebody at Marvel last year asking the question who was stronger. Captain America or Blade. Bios both put Logan and Cap at 800lbs. Guess what the response was?

Originally posted by snoopdogg
I emailed somebody at Marvel last year asking the question who was stronger. Captain America or Blade. Bios both put Logan and Cap at 800lbs. Guess what the response was?

also capt not wolverine. Unlike capt wolverine always been stated on pannel as beyond human not peak-human.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
depends which bio yours looking at. he has bio that state he superhuman, he has bio who state he enchanced human ect.

also capt not wolverine. Unlike capt wolverine always been stated on pannel as beyond human not peak-human.

Anyways here's is my copy and pasted email to Stuart Vandal.

Question:
> And would Blade
> be stronger than Cap. America?

Response:
"Yes. Cap is peak human strength, whereas Blade has genuine, if low
level, superhuman strength."

Originally posted by snoopdogg
I think Cap is stronger than Logan is. That's just my view though.

Originally posted by snoopdogg
Anyways here's is my copy and pasted email to Stuart Vandal.

Question:
> And would Blade
> be stronger than Cap. America?

Response:
"Yes. Cap is peak human strength, whereas Blade has genuine, if low
level, superhuman strength."

According to on pannel statements Logan has always been inhuman level of a strength. Not ever onces peak-human.

so even if I believe this was real, or even cared what a single marvel person thought it still would only prove that balde is beyond peak-human which Logan also is.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
Marvel does not agree according to on pannel statements.

This does not help your arguement at all.

Originally posted by Battlehammer

According to on pannel statements Logan has always been inhuman level of a strength. Not ever onces peak-human.

Originally posted by Battlehammer

so even if I believe this was real, or even cared what a single marvel person thought it still would only prove that balde is beyond peak-human which Logan also is.

Isn't that bio like from the 90's ?

That has Captain Britain as only in the 2 ton range....

Originally posted by Battlehammer
............are you kidding me? He acted like a complete idiot. he did not think a single o ne of his action through and simply attacked.

porve that he faster or stronger. Nothing in the issue suggested so.

no he did show intelligence, in a later issue you see he thought extremely quickly and tried to escape the school before the hunger overcame him

Originally posted by Faceman
Isn't that bio like from the 90's ?