Are you high? Darthsith, your argument was that Count Dooku is "stronger" than Obi-Wan, physically. Why are you citing this example? In terms of strength, Arnold would effortlessly rip Bruce Lee apart. The accolades that that man had won for his lifting strength are legion. While Bruce Lee would have likely kicked Arnold's ass, it was because he was faster, more agile, and trained in a discipline meant for combat.
Originally posted by darthsith19
Bruce Lee was way smaller than Arnold Schwarzenegger was but could likely have whooped Schwarzenegger's ass in a heartbeat.
And the point I was making, if you'll look again, was that just because person A is a better unarmed fighter than person B doesn't mean than person A has more muscle.
Originally posted by darthsith19
Simply because one is trained in unarmed, hand to hand combat, doesn't mean that they are strong physically.
This is retarded. Now you're comparing them to how they look underneath their robes? And you think Dooku is some mountain of muscle underneath that cape? This is beyond stupid, Darthsith.
Originaly posted by darthsith19
For the record, I believe that Anakin is physically stronger than Dooku, in case there was any confusion there.
I said Anakin has more muscle than Dooku does, not that Dooku was a mountain of muscle. Since when did having more muscle than Kenobi make you a mountain of muscle?
Yoda overpowered Sidious and Dooku in saber locks (the same Dooku whom you contend to be stronger than Obi-Wan). I guess he would just decimate anyone in an arm wrestling contest?
Yeah, we're done. I'm normally patient when it comes to arguments, but this is, no joke, the dumbest thing I've ever, ever read.