Originally posted by namorsubbySo are you seriously arguing that Batman > Kryptonian aim?
supergirl's beam evaded. cyke's beams can definitely be. discount it for PIS or whatever you want,it doesn't matter. the fact is batman does things like that all the time.if anyone's implying anything, i'd suggest they just say it instead.
Originally posted by Faux Smurphare you saying the scan was PIS?
So are you seriously arguing that Batman > Kryptonian aim?
that's what most would do. there's always that to retreat to in a batman vs anyone debate. show a scan of him doing somthing supporting his argument,and it's PIS. anything besides him beating up a common thug or another human is realistically right?
Originally posted by Faux Smurphsupergirl's beam isn't aligned with her sight. her beams may be lightspeed,but she isn't.it just takes thought is all.
And yet you just showed Batman dodging lightspeed eye beams, and treat them as perfectly valid showings.L-O-L.
i knew you'd call it PIS once i refuted all your attempts to pick it apart,that's always the last resort in this type of topic.i don't bother arguing with others who use those tactics.so i won't bother arguing with you anymore.
i'm through for now.
Originally posted by namorsubby
oh i don't know,because she doesn't aotumatically hit everything she looks at,like batman for instance.
Still doesn't make any sense. Aligning the beams with her eyes makes them more accurate, it doesn't mean dodging them is impossible. Just like dodging gun fire is possible by avoiding where the person will be shooting.
Originally posted by namorsubbyI never called PIS, and you haven't refuted anything, just dodged my questions over and over.
i knew you'd call it PIS once i refuted all your attempts to pick it apart,that's always the last resort in this type of topic.i don't bother arguing with others who use those tactics.so i won't bother arguing with you anymore.
The fact is, that you're holding double standards and judgements that lack... sense.
Originally posted by namorsubbyNo.
are you saying the scan was PIS?that's what most would do. there's always that to retreat to in a batman vs anyone debate. show a scan of him doing somthing supporting his argument,and it's PIS. anything besides him beating up a common thug or another human is realistically right?
I'm saying what I've said this entire time.
It's not PIS, she was just underestimating him, and not going anywhere near the full extent of her kryptonian abilities, which would account for super aim.
So, she wasn't using her "super aim".
Your response was equivalent to "lol, she's kryptonian, of course she's got super aim!"
I asked if you seriously believed that Batman could doge a kryptonian super aim.
Now you claim I'm calling it PIS.
Originally posted by namorsubbyHow would this apply to Cyclops (if his beams were lightspeed) any more than it does Supergirl?
supergirl's beam isn't aligned with her sight. her beams may be lightspeed,but [b]she isn't.it just takes thought is all.
[/B]
Her beams are as aligned with her sight and Scott's are.
Batman is not dodging a wide and high beam from cyclops nuff said. If you think otherwise then your speaking of batgod and bringing PIS into a vs. topic. If you think he's dodging then your saying batman is FTL or can phase through time space. Stop talking about narrow beams WIDE and HIGH he is dead.
Originally posted by razor4life
Batman is not dodging a wide and high beam from cyclops nuff said. If you think otherwise then your speaking of batgod and bringing PIS into a vs. topic. If you think he's dodging then your saying batman is FTL or can phase through time space. Stop talking about narrow beams WIDE and HIGH he is dead.
Scott shouldn't even be able to see if he has these "huge, wide" beams of energy blocking his sight, coming from out of his eye's.
Ohh, wait. Cyclops is one of those comedic characters who can never, ever be taken seriously.
I wonder what happens to the environment when Scott takes his shades off to clean 'em?