Originally posted by Devil King
The right or wrong thing is not applicable in this case. If you open your wallet and look at the cash, there are unique serial numbers on each bill. These don't just exist for funsies. The minute this guy would have tried to spend the cash or deposite into his own bank account, the feds would have been on him like stink on shit. Returning the money was his only real option.
That really depends, like I said, if it was the deposit on some company which Brinks was taking to the bank, it would be untraceable cash.
The only real cash that banks have, that is traceable, it's money they specifically have set aside in case of a robbery.
Originally posted by Robtard
That really depends, like I said, if it was the deposit on some company which Brinks was taking to the bank, it would be untraceable cash.The only real cash that banks have, that is traceable, it's money they specifically have set aside in case of a robbery.
You mean banks have money set aside for robberies?
Originally posted by Devil King
You mean banks have money set aside for robberies?
Ringers, so the crooks take it along with the other cash. The FBI is aware of those ringer's serial numbers. When the thieves spend those bills (slong with the other cash), the Feds can track it and see where the thieves are spending.