Originally posted by Gideon
Statements such as this are a total waste of time, effort, and posting space.
As is replying to said statement with an entire paragraph, and as mentioned, it was a single sentence, hardly took a lot of time, effort or posting space, and I was simply speaking the truth.
I find the suggestion that "Bane is far more influential" than the Sith Lord who was the revenge of the Sith -- not the one who triggered it, but the actual embodiment of the idea itself -- to be absolutely baseless and ridiculous.
Oh, he was the actual embodiment of the idea now, was he? Could I ask for a canon statement that hasn't been taken out of context that states as much?
Either way, given that who you describe as the "embodiment of the idea itself" not only relied on the teachings of Bane and the entire BoD to become what he was, but directly utilised what Bane had alone established and single-handedly made vast (and what had been building in strength for over a millenium) for his rise to power, I really don't see how your argument has a leg to stand on.
What's more, Nebaris, it would seem that you're the underdog in this argument and the only one arguing in favor for it,
Your point? Not many have even read Ro2, and far less would probably have even picked up on the passage which largely supports my argument. Then there's of course the fact that few actually like to argue against the popular concensus, and that even then, not many even care about arguing for Bane. So yeah, what point are you trying to make? Please tell me you’re not about to start appealing to majority.
going so far as to cite only a single source that does not conclude that Bane's influence exceeds Palpatine's own machinations.
Firstly, it's not like Bane's appeared in an abundance of sources like Palpatine has, but the fact that the "single source" alone establishes that not only did Bane create what Palpatine would later directly use to exact his revenge on the Jedi, but also that individually, the scope of his own machinations were pretty immense, to the point where his reach extended into the Republic and Jedi Order itself, the "single source," in this case, is adequate in making a case for Bane.
Secondly, it's not like that's the only component of my argument. As I said, he ensured the survival of the Sith for over a millenium through his own actions, by destroying the BoD and creating the Ro2, and his influence spread over a thousand years, which is more than we can say for Palpatine.
No one denies Bane's machinations were of immense importance. But none of what you have posted or mentioned is conclusive;
Based on what we know, it is pretty conclusive. I mean, can you even substantiate anything that Palpatine achieved on his own merits? I won't claim to know all there is to know about Palpatine and his individual achievements, so if you make a valid case for him, I'd only be too happy to concede the argument, but as it stands, there's nothing that points to him being more influential than Bane.
essentially, you've proven that the Sith Lord had an immense and vast network of spies and informants.
No, I've proven that he created the network of spies and informants, that he single-handedly made it what it was, and that he had already been putting into place a hundred long-term plans to build its strength (as well as weaken the Republic from within), and that this practise logically would have continued from Master to Apprentice for a thousand years.
So what?
"So what?" It means that the best of what Palpatine achieved was entirely dependant on what Bane had single-handedly established, and what he and the Ro2 Sith Lords that followed had been building in strength.
As I said, what did Palpatine truly achieve through his own merits, and how does it compare to the vast number of achievements that Bane possessed?
Has the entire Expanded Universe regarding the prequel trilogy and even subsequent material eluded you entirely? I rather doubt it. Bane wasn't the only one with a galaxy spanning network of minions, spies, and informants: Palpatine himself demonstrated a vast (perhaps even more vast) network himself (see my following post).
I can only assume that you haven't been reading my posts properly, as my exact reasoning points to that exact conclusion. As I said, Bane's network of spies would have logically been building in strength all the way up until Palpatine's rise to power, so of course Palpatine's would have been greater in scale, but the point is, Bane was the one who created it from scratch, and Bane individually made it stronger than can be argued for anyone else, including Palaptine, based on existing evidence.
Ridiculous, Nebaris. Take every single sourcebook, chronology, or other time-line related material published by LFL, and compare how many times Bane is featured to the amount of times that Sidious is. It's the consensus that the scope of Palpatine's influence is vastly superior to Bane's own.
More appearences in the Expanded Universe does not make him the more influential Sith. This line of thought is exactly what's "ridiculous"; the fact that Bane doesn't appear as often as Palaptine does in the countless reference material and novels that make up the EU does not take away from the scope of his individual achievements, and it doesn't change the fact that what Palpatine achieved was largely through Bane's own actions rather than his own merits.
That you cite time is also preposterous, as we are not privy to any material expanding a thousand years after Palpatine's lifetime, so we can't say for sure.
We argue based on what we know, Gideon; Bane's influence extended over a thousand years, and it's more than what we can say for Palpatine.
What you’re saying would be tantamount to me saying that you can’t say that Palpatine was more influential than random Jedi Knight #251 from the year 16,258 BBY, simply because we don’t know enough about his/her exploits. It’s quite simply stupid.
That you claim Palpatine simply acted upon what Bane put into place is ridiculous. Bane didn't leave the Sith Lord blueprints or a step-by-step plan. Sidious's machinations were the result of his own brilliant mind, not Bane. Bane merely provided the goal.
"Darth Sidious proved to be the grim culmination of a thousand years of Sith philosophy and teachings." -- The Essential Guide to the Force.
”Over that same time, her Master had begun to assemble the pieces that would one day allow the Sith to rise up and rule the galaxy.
He'd created a vast network of spies and informants, but Zannah had no idea as to its true extent, or even how to contact them. He had put into motion a hundred long-range plans to slowly build their strength while weakening the Republic." - Rule of Two.
You have it right there; Palpatine not only relied on the network of spies that Bane had created, single-handedly made strong, and that had been building in strength for over a thousand years, but he's described as being the embodiment of the BoD's teachings and philosphy, indicating that the BoD's teachings in the art of manipulation and such was a huge part of what made Palaptine what he was.
So as we have it, not only are Bane's individual achievements greater than Palpatine's own, not only does his influence spread over a larger time period, but all that Palpatine achieved was largely through Bane and the BoD's actions and teachings rather than through his own merits. As I said, it's conclusive.