DC vs. MK

Because I'm an ******* and anyone's opinion that disagrees with mine automatically sucks.

Originally posted by NonSensi-Klown
Because I'm an ******* and anyone's opinion that disagrees with mine automatically sucks.

🤨 🤨 🤨

Okay...well anyway incase nobody posted it, there's a pic added on the Noob website:

http://www.noob.com/

Originally posted by SmashBro
There's a reason why it's called a "personal opinion". Not everyone is gonna see what you see.

You tend to hold your own opinion on much higher regard than anyone elses, hell, I have caught you hold your opinion higher than fact.

Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
You just don't get what he is saying.

You tend to hold your own opinion on much higher regard than anyone elses, hell, I have caught you hold your opinion higher than fact.

Stop lying. I never hold my opinion as fact or higher than anyone elses and I really wouldn't be talking if I were you, Jaxx.

Take it to PMs, guys.

Originally posted by SmashBro
http://www.noob.com/

The character models for the MK characters look pretty cool. Hopefully, we'll get some screenshots of the DC characters.

Yeah, that's what I wanna see too.

Originally posted by SmashBro
Stop lying. I never hold my opinion as fact or higher than anyone elses and I really wouldn't be talking if I were you, Jaxx.

I guess that's why I am the one who people PM asking questions as if I were an authority on videogames and have people telling me I am one of the best debaters in game vs., whereas most people just consider you a biased, illogical fanboy.

Originally posted by I-Drop
Ditto. If Cage isn't in it, FVCK THIS GAME!!!!!

......no talk bout the game eh?

Originally posted by I-Drop
Fvck this game. MK - Cage = suck. It always has. Cage wasn't in MK3 & it marked the downfall of the series. Cage(had all the cool lines in the 1st one)got killed like he wasn't even in the 2nd MK movie & it was a failure. They may still have time to add him in, but if they don't, I hope it fails bigtime

I agree that the lack of him in MK3 was what made it not as good as the first 2 installments, but that wasn't the only reason.

...You know I actually did not mind 3. 😐

I guess it is cause Cage is a queer.

Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
Lol.

I guess that's why I am the one who people PM asking questions as if I were an authority on videogames and have people telling me I am one of the best debaters in game vs., whereas most people just consider you a biased, illogical fanboy.

I find that really hard to believe, seeing how most of the time, you make up so many BS claims just make sure you win an argument, instead of trying to make some good points.

I'm not the one who said that lifting a boulder is less impressive than ripping a human in half. 😬

Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
I'm not the one who said that lifting a boulder is less impressive than ripping a human in half. 😬

And? I wasn't the one who was trying debate about something I hadn't even seen (like the MKDA intro).

Only I have seen it.

You were debating it was PIS simply cause your special friend Liu Kang got WTFpwned, which wasn't even a low showing considering both opponents were at his level.

Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
Only I have seen it.

Yeah, probably after that debate.

Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
You were debating it was PIS simply cause your special friend Liu Kang got WTFpwned, which wasn't even a low showing considering both opponents were at his level.

And here again, that had nothing to do with why they ganged up on him. You continuously kept bringing up Shang Tsung's different styles as a reason why Liu Kang lost despite the fact that Liu Kang was seemingly WINNING the fight until Quan Chi interferred.

...Dude, you brought up Liu Kang knowing many styles first, and then I said using your logic, Tsung is stronger, as he knows even more styles than Kang. 😐

And who cares if Kang was winning at first? Point is two of MK's best ganged up on him, and Kang lost. It would have been shit writing if he won.

Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
...Dude, you brought up Liu Kang knowing many styles first, and then I said using your logic, Tsung is stronger, as he knows even more styles than Kang. 😐

That's got nothing to do with Liu Kang getting snuck in the back and getting his neck snapped. You can't apply that same thing here because that's got NOTHING to do with why they ganged up on him.

Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
And who cares if Kang was winning at first? Point is two of MK's best ganged up on him, and Kang lost. It would have been shit writing if he won.

❌ Yeah, it's clear you still didn't see the intro. You're just saying "they ganged up on him" when I'm talking about HOW they managed to gang up on him. All you're doing is coming up with these excuses that's got nothing to do with what happened in the intro. And yes it matters a whole if Liu Kang was winning because that renders your point useless, therefore, you should stop bringing it up.

Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
...You know I actually did not mind 3. 😐

I guess it is cause Cage is a queer.

But Ultimate MK3/MK Trilogy changed that, so meh.

Originally posted by SmashBro
That's got nothing to do with Liu Kang getting snuck in the back and getting his neck snapped. You can't apply that same thing here because that's got NOTHING to do with why they ganged up on him.

❌ Yeah, it's clear you still didn't see the intro. You're just saying "they ganged up on him" when I'm talking about HOW they managed to gang up on him. All you're doing is coming up with these excuses that's got nothing to do with what happened in the intro. And yes it matters a whole if Liu Kang was winning because that renders your point useless, therefore, you should stop bringing it up.

And what about how they ganged up on him bothers you? He was winning against Tsung, no surprise, he afterall has beaten him before. But then Quan blindsided him and then Kang got pwned. So...Yeah.