Originally posted by Mindset
Master you didn't know anyone can edit wiki entries?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolverine_%28comics%29
Look under skills and personality section
pricesless and true lol.
Originally posted by Mindset
Master you didn't know anyone can edit wiki entries?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolverine_%28comics%29
Look under skills and personality section
pricesless and true lol.
Originally posted by Mindsethmmm thats odd...when I click your link, I see your edit
Master you didn't know anyone can edit wiki entries?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolverine_%28comics%29
Look under skills and personality section
but when I get to Wolverine Wiki through google, your edit isn't there
Originally posted by Mindsetwell it doesn't show up on the official entry...which is the one through google
Why would you go through google?Anyway there's all the proof you need, I honestly am surprised you didn't know anyone could edit.
Im not quite sure your link is different from the google entry
Originally posted by Battlehammerlions are stronger on average...lions are built for battle...tigers are built for stalking. lions have stronger upper bodies while tigers are leaner, which make them better to pounce.
size, weight, strength, speed pritty much every thing.They even said a lion was stronger on average which is falses and quite ignorant.
that's not wrong at all.
Originally posted by Master-Borg
lions are stronger on average...lions are built for battle...tigers are built for stalking. lions have stronger upper bodies while tigers are leaner, which make them better to pounce.that's not wrong at all.
Actaully Tiger are more built for big cat fighting then lion. Big cats fight on there hind legs so actaully a tiger is more biult for battle.
Not only do tigers weight more on average but even if the weight the same they would still be stronger then a lion which is state in pritty much an animal encyclopidea as well as the mammal enecyclopidia as well as countless other books.
pleases do show such ignorances. I have studied tigers for years. There the second stronger big cat in the world pound for pound. The panther is the strongest pound for pound however the tiger is stronger due to it sizes. Tiger is the strongest big cat and largest in the world. The siberian is the biggest and strongest of the tigers.
Originally posted by Battlehammer
Actaully Tiger are more built for big cat fighting then lion. Big cats fight on there hind legs so actaully a tiger is more biult for battle.
um...hind legs don't help you in a battle. Cats use their front legs to fight. Just like boxers need strong arms more than strong legs.
Lions are more powerful than tigers pound for pound. But a siberian tiger prob beats a lion just because it is massive.
Also, lions are generally more aggressive which makes them good fighters.
there's a reason why Lions are called kings of the jungle
Originally posted by Master-Borg
um...hind legs don't help you in a battle. Cats use their front legs to fight. Just like boxers need strong arms more than strong legs.Lions are more powerful than tigers pound for pound. But a siberian tiger prob beats a lion just because it is massive.
Also, lions are generally more aggressive which makes them good fighters.
there's a reason why Lions are called kings of the jungle
Originally posted by Master-Borg
um...hind legs don't help you in a battle.Cats use their front legs to fight. Just like boxers need strong arms more than strong legs.
Lions are more powerful than tigers pound for pound. But a siberian tiger prob beats a lion just because it is massive.
Also, lions are generally more aggressive which makes them good fighters.
there's a reason why Lions are called kings of the jungle
---The lower the # the stronger lb for lb--- compared to the jaguar's 75:100 ratio and the cheetah's 96:100 ratio
From the HRR quotient studies: the tiger's bones showed that it was 5% stronger than the lion preportionately, and this is the bones alone, and no animal goes against the HRR law, which states that the larger the difference in the ratio, the stronger the animal is. HRR also says that the shorter the humerous than the radius, the more muscle the animal has, so compare the 7% difference in the ratio's and multiply it by 3 because you multiply is by the two bicep muscles and the bone... (7x3)= 21% strength difference PREPORTIONATELY... that means the tiger's swipe would be let's see... 415/480= 86... 100-86= 14, 21%+14%= 35% stronger, which is why the tiger was on Animal planet's the most extreme STRENGTH as #4...
Tiger are stronger then lions because there elbow to shoulder is so much longer then elbow to hand this is were the big cats strength comes from.( the way of the tiger) The lion ration of elbow boen to shoulder is a great deal smaller then the tigers. the lion how ever elbow to paw is longer making the lion not stornger but weaker. so if the tige rand lion were the same weight then the tiger would be stronger , but since the tiger is already heavier it is a great deal stronger.
ya well looking at these weights below me the tigers clearly have a good weight advantage over the lion and as u ca nalso see the tigers hieght advantage is also a good dela more then inches try a few feet.
Yes, the tiger is approx. 30-35% stronger than the lion preportionately, which means that if we had a 450lb tiger vs. a 450lb lion this would be a good estimate as to how much of their weight would be thrown into the punch- not in foot lbs or inches- just body weight... It is estimated that both lions and tigers convert about 30% of their body weights into their attacks so:
450x30%= 135lbs- this is about how much each cat would throw at eachother with each swipe
(now calculate the tiger's being approx. 35% stronger)
135lbsx35%= approx. 47 lbs
So with two animals of equal weights (450lbs) the tiger would throw swipes with about 182lbs of body weight behind them while the lion would throw swipes with about 135lbs behind them.
Now if we change to the average weights of the animals watch what happens:
Tiger= 480lbsx30%=144lbsx35%= 50lbs--- 144lbs+50lbs= 194lbs
Lion= 415lbsx30%= 124.5lbs
That- my friends- is why strength matters- if we take an average sized Bengal tiger and compare it's strength to an average sized African lion, we find that the tiger throws (124.5/194= 64%) 36% more damage at the lion, than the lion does to the tiger...
Each Bengal tiger swipe does approx. 36% more damage than each lion swipe
(Researched used from Alan Turner, PHD)
So like I said a tiger is stronger.
Oh and Lion don’t even live in a jungle and that was just a dumb ass comment by you.
By the way a tiger>Lion in a fight.
Originally posted by Mindset
Master you didn't know anyone can edit wiki entries?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolverine_%28comics%29
Look under skills and personality section
😂
🤣
Originally posted by Battlehammer
? thoses are facts. backed by sciencetific research. You really wanna have a lion vs tiger debate with me?
its not a fact that tigers are stronger than lions
for one, I don't buy that study at all. you don't calculate power using some bullshit method that someone just pulled outta their ass. Let's go by observations in nature...lions fight other lions, hyenas, buffalos, and even elephants. Tigers fight deers and rabits and bascially scavenge. That's clear proof that lions are built to fight while tigers are built to stalk, hence their camouflage.
I'm already owning you in this debate.
Originally posted by Master-Borg
its not a fact that tigers are stronger than lions
Yes it is.
Originally posted by Master-Borg
for one, I don't buy that study at all. you don't calculate power using some bullshit method that someone just pulled outta their ass.
Originally posted by Master-Borg
Let's go by observations in nature...lions fight other lions, hyenas, buffalos, and even elephants.
Hyenas has defeated lions before….this does not help your cases.
Pleases provide evidences of a lion fighting an elephant, becuases it bs. Lion do not fight, or attack elephants.
Originally posted by Master-Borg
Tigers fight deers and rabits and bascially scavenge.
tigers are known to kill and eat brown bears and black bears.( the way of the tiger page 43) tiger are known to kill leopards and sloth bears along with dholes(the way of the tiger page 43)
Tiger killing a croc which is pretty common
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=325693135857859976
Originally posted by Master-Borg
That's clear proof that lions are built to fight while tigers are built to stalk,
ALL TIGERS LIVES DEPEND ON STRENGTH AN FIGHTING ABILITY (The encyclopedia of mammals, page 20)
Originally posted by Master-Borg
hence their camouflage
Originally posted by Master-Borg
I'm already owning you in this debate.
By owning you mean ignoring my evidences, because you dislike it while provided none your self?