Some parents really need to whoop their kids' ass.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I have no idea what you're actually arguing. It looks EXACTLY like point I made about you above.

To answer your question, none of the above. The third option: "you made a perfectly placed post that was a witty play on the idiom 'who wears the pants in this relationship' and it was only applicable to that one post and has no place outside of that realm. Which makes me understand why you couldn't fathom Roland's reply post of 'you fail at making de-motivational posters' because it was quite obviously a poster for only one person and not a literally a 'de-motivational' poster."

I can understand why you would try to argue this point...but why not just say, "I don't think Roland got the poster"?

So, can we recap. You defended your poster with some idiotic argument. I said it was an idiotic argument. You said you got my point and explained to me why you thought it was a good poster. I told you again that I didn't voice an opinion on the poster but just your argument for why it didn't fail and now you posted this inane compilation of horseshit.

Please, please, could you just read my posts, should be easy for a self proclaimed genius.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Dude, could you stop being an idiot. I never said that your thing failed. I was solely making a point that your defense for the poster was moronic and a logical fallacy at best.

So, can we recap. You defended your poster with some idiotic argument. I said it was an idiotic argument. You said you got my point and explained to me why you thought it was a good poster. I told you again that I didn't voice an opinion on the poster but just your argument for why it didn't fail and now you posted this inane compilation of horseshit.

Please, please, could you just read my posts, should be easy for a self proclaimed genius.

You see...I get all of that. You are failing to see MY point. The argument was, is, and will continue to be a logical justification for making the poster; why is it so hard to miss that?

Originally posted by dadudemon
You see...I get all of that. You are failing to see MY point. The argument was, is, and will continue to be a logical justification for making the poster; why is it so hard to miss that?

Originally posted by Neo Darkhalen
You act like a troll to build up your low self esteem, I never say anything but to be honest you are rather sad.

Please, don't tell what I do and why I do it.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Please, don't tell what I do and why I do it.

Please don't speak to me then.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I am not missing that you idiot. I explained that to you in my post. I explained that that is your point. And I explained what my point is and why it is stupid for you to reply to me making your idiotic points saying that you are replying to what I said. Get it now? I doubt it...

I agree that my further justifications are unrelated to your point of my original justification being an illogical rationalization, however, this point still stands for the reason why my original justification was a logical one...

observe:

Originally posted by dadudemon
Why do I fail at making these posters when it was not intended to go on ebaumsworld and make front page?

You disagreed with the logic utilized or implied in this post to rationlize why a "fail at making de-motivational posters" is an illogical comment concerning that poster. I replied with the following:

Originally posted by dadudemon
That poster was ONLY intended for just one person and would really only work for that one person AFTER that specific post.

You seem to realize that Roland's post to me had the assumption that it was a de-motivational poster and this poster is why I fail at making them. The poster would not work as a de-motivational poster in the common sense because its actual meaning is lost on anyone except those who read his post and those who were familiar with the idiom being referenced in his post.

I justified why the poster was not aimed at going up on ebaumsworld's front page. Your youtube example was horribly flawed because he had every intention to make that goal but I had no intention on "making that goal" because it had a specific audience and a specific goal. (edit-queue you mentioning his wanting to be or not be on the braziliam soccer team...which, btw, is another logical failure on your part. The direct interpretation of the soccer player's intention was to MAKE the goal.)

You are the one who has failed to exercise logic and this occurred the moment you started with your failed youtube video reference. You have continued this failure by your accusations of failed justification because I "am missing it".

Bardock, its okay to be wrong sometimes. You have obviously failed at your nitpicking and you failed with your example. I would accuse you of hypocrisy because you accuse me of failed logic when you are the one who failed with your youtube point...but that wouldn't be true because you fully thought that the point made with the youtube video was logical, ergo the reason it wouldn't truly be hypocrisy on your part...just failure. (double edit-I know what you have done literally fits the definition of hypocrisy...but usually the hypcrit is full aware of his or her hypocrisy...so you don't really intend hypocrisy, hence why I think calling you a hypcrit is not really applicable.)

Also, you can stop with the name calling and the digging up of the past arguments. They reveal too much your inability to have an adult discussion without resorting to childish tactics. I could understand if I was calling you names or talking down to you, but that is not the case. If they were good natured insults and were only meant has humor between the two of us, forgive my misinterpreting them.

If that is the case, you're an idiot and stop being a dumbshit. You failed at your nit-picking and your youtube point was utterly asinine.

Again, you are wrong. I explained to you why your reasoning was wrong. Then you started whining about why you did not fail at making the poster, which I never said. So, fair enough, you realized you were wrong, I don't want to embarrass you further.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
You're far more annoying than they are.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Again, you are wrong. I explained to you why your reasoning was wrong. Then you started whining about why you did not fail at making the poster, which I never said. So, fair enough, you realized you were wrong, I don't want to embarrass you further.

I edited my post.

Also, if this is your way of saying, "you are right but I have too much of an ego to admit that I was wrong and my logic failed with the youtube video", I accept your admittance of defeat.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I edited my post.

Also, if this is your way of saying, "you are right but I have too much of an ego to admit that I was wrong and my logic failed with the youtube video", I accept your admittance of defeat.

You posted the poster
Roland said it failed
You said you weren't aiming at an ebaums audience
I said the argument is not logical
You explained why your poster was good in your opinion

Which is stupid.

If you want to comment on my point, that's okay, please stop whining to me about how good your joke was, I don't intend to compliment you on it, you will have to live without my feedback on your stuff in this case.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Nah. It's not. It's just my way of saying that this issue is way to easy to warrant replying to your wall of text. The argument again in a few easy steps.

You posted the poster
Roland said it failed
You said you weren't aiming at an ebaums audience
I said the argument is not logical
You explained why your poster was good in your opinion

Which is stupid.

If you want to comment on my point, that's okay, please stop whining to me about how good your joke was, I don't intend to compliment you on it, you will have to live without my feedback on your stuff in this case.

I guess this is why your failed.

Let me edit your post to point out your failure.

I posted the poster
Roland said I fail at making de-motivational posters. (there is a difference between a simple poster and a de-motivational poster. My poster had the look and feel of a de-motivational poster..but it really wasn't...I've already justified why.)
I said I my goal is not the general internet audience aimed at getting many laughs. (my point with the ebaums reference...I guess you missed that, didn't you? 😆...yes, that means I am laughing at you. 😐)
You said the argument is not logical and posted a youtube video to justify my justifications failure.
I explained why my poster could not fail as a de-motivational poster because it wasn't a classic de-motivational poster.

And your point about my "whining about hoe good my joke was" is utter bollocks. That is obviously not my intentions. Nice try, though, to assume that the world revolves around you and your opinion.

Yes, yes, I understand you think your poster was good, Jee, stop trying to convince me of it, I don't care about your jokes.

You still missed my point, it's okay though, it happens.

Please, stop talking about how great your poster was though. I DO NOT CARE. If you want to address my initial post though, that's fine, since you really didn't write a line about that so far.

This place has turned into one big fight-fest. 😬

Can we all just STFU and get along? awesome

Be silent dadudemon. The German is talking!! awesome

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yes, yes, I understand you think your poster was good, Jee, stop trying to convince me of it, I don't care about your jokes.

You still missed my point, it's okay though, it happens.

Please, stop talking about how great your poster was though. I DO NOT CARE. If you want to address my initial post though, that's fine, since you really didn't write a line about that so far.

Nice straw-man. Can you please quote me where I said my poster was just awesome and good or anything similar to that? Actually, I do recall saying that it had a very limited appeal. So please, stop committing libel and straw-man.

Originally posted by Troop
Be silent dadudemon. The German is talking!! awesome

Damn...why couldn't someone give me this advice before. I guess its only a matter of time before you get banned again, huh? Shame...you are a good poster at times

Originally posted by dadudemon
Nice straw-man. Can you please quote me where I said my poster was just awesome and good or anything similar to that? Actually, I do recall saying that it had a very limited appeal. So please, stop committing libel and straw-man.

Damn...why couldn't someone give me this advice before. I guess its only a matter of time before you get banned again, huh? Shame...you are a good poster at times

Originally posted by dadudemon
Nice straw-man. Can you please quote me where I said my poster was just awesome and good or anything similar to that? Actually, I do recall saying that it had a very limited appeal. So please, stop committing libel and straw-man.

It's called connotation.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Nice straw-man. Can you please quote me where I said my poster was just awesome and good or anything similar to that? Actually, I do recall saying that it had a very limited appeal. So please, stop committing libel and straw-man.

Damn...why couldn't someone give me this advice before. I guess its only a matter of time before you get banned again, huh? Shame...you are a good poster at times

Originally posted by Bardock42
Haha, libel. But really, lets stop talking about your poster. If you want to talk about why the argument you made at first was illogical be my guest. I am sorry your poster didn't appeal to everyone.

Too late. The subject has already been discussed in detail. You haven't directly responded to my previous two points before the one you just resopnded to.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
It's called connotation.

Indeed...Bardock seems to have embellished it. (yes, I know that your post was another smartass post aimed at me.)

Originally posted by Troop
Who am I supposed to be?

You just gave yourself away with this post, you do realize that? If you'd like, I can teach you how to troll a little better. Your characters get banned much too fast.