Originally posted by Bardock42If so in all reverence do you understand that OUR Constitution is becoming eroded by the far right?
We understand that you hate conservative parties, but really, it all depends whether you want to be stripped of your civil or economic rights.
The Judgse that are elected for life in the term of a presidency as nil. Do you understand that the politics are really not ruled by the person in seat, but by a larger authority that they elect. One that is not impeachable.
Originally posted by DigiMark007
I'd make the same distinction as bardock concerning spam. If they're considered the same thing, then that's dumb and it wouldn't take much to draw a line between the two types, passive and invasive....
I know they have been opposing extreme feminist groups in recent years who want to make porn illegal, citing it as a loss of women's rights both during the making of it and also the viewing of it.
Kinda odd, since porn stars voluntarily choose to take part in it, just like any other business (women are actually much more highly paid on average). Not that I condone some of the more degrading portrayals of women in porn, but at the same time I struggle to think of one instance where public opinion was altered through freedom-denying censorship. It would set a dangerous precedent, imo, so I fully support the ACLU in such endeavors.
Fear mongering of what, per Se?
Originally posted by Deja~vuSTFU!
If so in all reverence do you understand that OUR Constitution is becoming eroded by the far right?The Judgse that are elected for life in the term of a presidency as nil. Do you understand that the politics are really not ruled by the person in seat, but by a larger authority that they elect. One that is not impeachable.
Originally posted by Deja~vu
If so in all reverence do you understand that OUR Constitution is becoming eroded by the far right?The Judgse that are elected for life in the term of a presidency as nil. Do you understand that the politics are really not ruled by the person in seat, but by a larger authority that they elect. One that is not impeachable.
far right =/= conservative
the actual term is neoconservative, though I prefer theocratic fascist
Originally posted by Deja~vuMy view is that you should Shut the **** Up with your dilettant evaluation of political life in the United States.
This I would suppose would be up the thought of intellectuals of what can happen to a country if not for a lobby group.Can you give more than a stiffles set of letters to enunciate your views more clearly.,
In this Country we have a "Bill of Rights."
Originally posted by Deja~vu
If so in all reverence do you understand that OUR Constitution is becoming eroded by the far right?The Judgse that are elected for life in the term of a presidency as nil. Do you understand that the politics are really not ruled by the person in seat, but by a larger authority that they elect. One that is not impeachable.
This seems off-topic
Originally posted by Bardock42You've only heard about them? Yet we depend on them or are have very few options... to per-say then to do so.
The ACLU? I guess average. Probably more than you, or at least I understood what I heard about them. Why does it matter though?
One instance of law.
If one is arrested outside his home on at? It si becoming so now.. into this person's house? According to the 4th Armament is NOT permissable.. Yet officials that have been finding the words "Probable cause". it is not a true view of the Constitut9on....Using the words "probable cause"..Yet this law was meeeeeeeent for fire arms. and nothing more........but, now. going into anothers house. Oh, and what you find is what is going to get you..
In this instance, the Constitution was forfeited AND MAde NULL..
Until the liiberal judges along with the liberal parties...in the last 20 years...The laws most favored the people. Now with the conservative judges and like, the laws have gone array and favor the police and court systems. i. e,. GOVERMENT AND IT'S CONTROLS.
YEPPERRS...A FREE COUNTRY..
OTHER SCEINARAAIOS?
Originally posted by Deja~vuOne instance of law.
If one is arrested outside his home of on other premises..Is it lawful to for them to come in without a search warret? It si becoming so now.. into this parson's house? According ot the 4th Armament is is NOT. Yet officials that have been finding the words " which is what is going now now..NO SEARCH WARRANT. it is not a true view of the Constitut9on. You must have more than probably cause the go into ones own house.
That's kinda recent but you would be surprised how they took advantage of this after hurricane Katrina in New Orleans
Originally posted by Deja~vu
How?
Well, there are a lot of stories that have not come out by citizens of the city about the people being killed without reason.
Martial law had been declared but people were saying the authorities had been acting outside of reason.
I can not find a reliable online source to support this claim but it is worth looking into. (I read too many books 🙁 )
Re: The ACLU
Originally posted by Deja~vu
What are your opinions on this Strong organisation? There are people that view it as against a harsh ultraconservative or moral institution. There are others that see it as a great safe guard against the stripping away of the United States Constitution.
If the US constitution were upheld and had evolved in the manner it was intended, there'd be no need for the ACLU.
Originally posted by Deja~vu
or are have very few options... to per-say then to do so.One instance of law.
If one is arrested outside his home on at? It si becoming so now.. into this person's house? According to the 4th Armament is NOT permissable.. Yet officials that have been finding the words "Probable cause". it is not a true view of the Constitut9on....Yet this law was meeeeeeeent for fire arms. ......but, now. going into anothers house.
the Constitution was forfeited AND MAde NULL..
Until the liiberal judges along with the liberal parties...in the last 20 years...The laws most favored the people. Now with the conservative judges and like, the laws have gone array and favor the police and court systems.
OTHER SCEINARAAIOS?
I took the freedom to edit out the bits and pieces of your post that at least made somewhat grammatical sense. I find it funnier this way.
I believe as a whole the ACLU is a good thing.
There was a case that involved a run away Judge, like many judges, went so far as to order a woman to have a surgical procedure so that she could not have any more children. The ACLU put that Judge straight.
Judges in this country are not to take it upon themselves to change laws, but to interpret them. The ACLU makes sure that Judges interpret them and not reinvent them.