Originally posted by dadudemon
Chill, chill. I am inexorably correct. Why fight it?Robtard, if you can quote me, chronologically, and write a description for why you think what you think, then I will show you where there is a more logical explanation for why you are wrong. Then you will have to lick my toes AFTER I work out.
Because you're not correct.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I know this. Why the hell would it be something about me?Now you've got me all confused. I already explained what you first edit was.
I don't know. I asked you what you were referring to, and you haven't said.
Originally posted by dadudemon
...s-s-sorry? 🙁It was more along the lines of, "You know that I know what you originally posted heh heh." Wasn't meant as smug at all, mate.
Well, that sounds to me like you're implying that I am trying to avoid anyone knowing what I originally posted, when it isn't the case.
That's why the smiley is annoying. Also known as Whirly's Last Stand.
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Because you're not correct.
You know, you could always just put him on ignore. I did it, and I've noticed that beyond being quoted because he's gotten into yet another argument because he's always wrong, no one ever quotes him or responds to his supposedly hilarious sense of humor, so if you do ignore him, you really do miss out on about 80% of his babbling.
Originally posted by dadudemonRobtard, if you can quote me, chronologically, and write a description for why you think what you think, then I will show you where there is a more logical explanation for why you are wrong. Then you will have to lick my toes AFTER I work out.
It's obvious you're wrong, as even VVD has no ****ing idea what you're rambling about and it originally started with you not understanding his basic comment.
I think a congratulations are in order, you're so full of your own shit now, that you've even surpassed JacopeX in 'fail per keystroke ratio'. *applauds*
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
I don't know. I asked you what you were referring to, and you haven't said.
Forgive me. With all that wit that comes from you keyboard, I thought for sure you would remember your original post before you edited it. It was witty. You said that you didn't know that debates were won with an adverb rather than hard facts....most likely referring to Adam_Poe's use of the word "necessarily". I asked for clarification because there was more than one debate taking place... (no, NOT because I thought it was about me...you idiots...more because I thought he had a good point and BEFORE I continued, I wanted to be sure that that was his point....but then he edited.)
Also, if you are feigning ingnorance "for a bit of fun" just so you can say later, "gotcha!" later on, fair enough...I will laugh when we get to that point. In the mean time, I will take you seriously and give legitimate responses assuming you aren't setting me up.
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Well, that sounds to me like you're implying that I am trying to avoid anyone knowing what I originally posted, when it isn't the case.
How can we be sure of that when you purposefully deleted the entire post and created an entirely new one that didn't even mean the same thing? You have indicated twice now that you don't remember what you have done. I don't know how you could have forgotten what you did earlier today because very few people delete their entire post and write a new one AFTER posting. One would think you would remember that.
Lest you think I am ragging on you for being dishonest, that is simply not the case. I could care less if someone did that to their posts.
This turned into failed attempt by butthurt and b*tch boy to accuse me of more falsehoods. They get bored sometimes.
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
That's why the smiley is annoying. Also known as Whirly's Last Stand.
Forgive me? 😕
Originally posted by Robtard
It's obvious you're wrong, as even VVD has no ****ing idea what you're rambling about and it originally started with you not understanding his basic comment.
Again, you are ignorant. You simply didn't see what he originally posted, therefore, you have no reason to believe me and now it appears that VVD is feigning ignorance for laugh at my expense. That doesn't change the fact that I'm right and you owe me an apology with making an incorrect statement.
Originally posted by Robtard
I think a congratulations are in order, you're so full of your own shit now, that you've even surpassed JacopeX in 'fail per keystroke ratio'. *applauds*
Thought about that one for a bit, didn't ya? You do realize that you failed on so many levels at this point, don't you?
Originally posted by dadudemon
Forgive me. With all that wit that comes from you keyboard, I thought for sure you would remember your original post before you edited it. It was witty. You said that you didn't know that debates were won with an adverb rather than hard facts....most likely referring to Adam_Poe's use of the word "necessarily". I asked for clarification because there was more than one debate taking place... (no, NOT because I thought it was about me...you idiots...more because I thought he had a good point and BEFORE I continued, I wanted to be sure that that was his point....but then he edited.)Also, if you are feigning ingnorance "for a bit of fun" just so you can say later, "gotcha!" later on, fair enough...I will laugh when we get to that point. In the mean time, I will take you seriously and give legitimate responses assuming you aren't setting me up.
Are you insane? What kind of ridiculously elaborate scheme would this be? Think through the ramifications of this being 'a set-up'.
I wasn't referring to Adam either. I edited because I wanted to say something else instead, and not discuss that point for hours. Apparently it didn't work.
Originally posted by dadudemon
How can we be sure of that when you purposefully deleted the entire post and created an entirely new one that didn't even mean the same thing?
As above, I changed what I wanted to say. Some mutant strain of solipsistic paranoia has turned this into a set-up.
Originally posted by dadudemon
You have indicated twice now that you don't remember what you have done. I don't know how you could have forgotten what you did earlier today because very few people delete their entire post and write a new one AFTER posting. One would think you would remember that.
No I didn't. I do remember what I said. Then I couldn't be bothered to get into it, so I changed the post. Why are you going on like post-editing points to a major international conspiracy? This is bizarre.
Originally posted by dadudemonnow it appears that VVD is feigning ignorance for laugh at my expense.
Stop this. It's like Czarina all over again.
He is insane.
As is this whole debate.
Let me recap what I'd say happened.
VVD posted
DDM read it
VVD edited
DDM replied to old post with something stupid and vague
VVD asked for clarification
DDM behaved like a moron
cue stupid debate.
The necessarily in DDM's post referred to a word in Adam's post.
VVD's original statement referred to things in general, maybe or maybe not caused by Adam't claim
We are all wankers and should STFU.
end
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Are you insane?
No. I am in complete control of all my mental faculties. More on this later.
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
What kind of ridiculously elaborate scheme would this be? Think through the ramifications of this being 'a set-up'.
I have, obviously. I wouldn't put it past you to pull someone's chain like this, though it would be out of character for you. You have a reputation for have a very snappy, sharp, witty sense of humor.
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
I wasn't referring to Adam either. I edited because I wanted to say something else instead, and not discuss that point for hours. Apparently it didn't work.
I am not sure what specifically you were referring to then. I asked for clarification for a reason. Now I have it.
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
As above, I changed what I wanted to say. Some mutant strain of solipsistic paranoia has turned this into a set-up.
Solipsism is hardly and accurate assessment since I am giving YOU credit for an elaborate scheme for an "lol". Because you even know what that is, it goes to further my point that you are more than intelligent enough to have played a joke on me.
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
No I didn't.
Yes you did. I don't want to be an a**hole to you and show you where you did just for the sake of my winning a trivial argument with you because I like you as a poster and I don't want to alienate you by being a dick.
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
I do remember what I said. Then I couldn't be bothered to get into it, so I changed the post. Why are you going on like post-editing points to a major international conspiracy? This is bizarre.
What does that mean? Does it mean that your pre-edited post was originally referential to Adam_Poe's post and you edited it because you didn't want to get into it? Indeed, Adam_Poe can be quite that good debater, so I can understand.
International conspiracy? Now who is being solipsistic?
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Stop this. It's like Czarina all over again.
No. I have more than a legitimate reason to suspect a joke at my expense. It happens quite often here. You are one of the more intelligent and witty members. Suspecting a joke at my expense from your direction is hardly paranoia. Also considering that I virtually gave a triage of almost complimentary perspectives and listed more than one interpretive perspective, that should lend itself to the conclusion that I took a logical and rational approach. That, in and of itself, is indicative of the anti-thesis of paranoia. Don't mistake intelligence for paranoia.
Originally posted by Bardock42
He is insane.
See my above post.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Let me recap what I'd say happened.VVD posted
DDM read it
VVD edited
DDM replied to old post with something stupid and vague
VVD asked for clarification
DDM behaved like a moron
cue stupid debate.The necessarily in DDM's post referred to a word in Adam's post.
VVD's original statement referred to things in general, maybe or maybe not caused by Adam't claim
We are all wankers and should STFU.end
Haven't we been through one of these already? Your assessment is correct for the most part. Here is a more accurate assessment.
VVD posted
DDM read it
VVD edited
DDM replied to old post with a clarification question because he supposed VVD's post to have a valid point.
DDM edited is post with an additional comment once he realized VVD edited.
Robtard and Chill were clueless of what had transpired so they threw insults and ignorant accusations.
DDM retorted and tried to argue reason.
VVD entered the debate and didn't know what DDM was referring to.
DDM explained and justified his position with suspicion of foul play.
VVD accused DDM of being insane due to his suspicions.
Bardock42 gave an accurate summary, for the most part.
DDM corrected Bardock42's summary to be more accurate.
DDM grew tired of this.