Originally posted by Robtard
It's clearly obvious that Dadudemon is yet again the victim of some malicious concoction to spoil his good name and/or everyone else in wrong while he is correct.Can you leave at that Dadudemon and stop with the "me, me, me"?
What an insightful and accurate assessment. You seem to have read my posts and understood them fully.
Originally posted by dadudemon
VVD posted
DDM read it
VVD edited
DDM replied to old post with a clarification question because he supposed VVD's post to have a valid point.
DDM edited is post with an additional comment once he realized VVD edited.
Robtard and Chill were clueless of what had transpired so they threw insults and ignorant accusations.
DDM retorted and tried to argue reason.
VVD entered the debate and didn't know what DDM was referring to.
DDM explained and justified his position with suspicion of foul play.
VVD accused DDM of being insane due to his suspicions.
Bardock42 gave an accurate summary, for the most part.
DDM corrected Bardock42's summary to be more accurate.
DDM grew tired of this.
I was mainly in the debate for a laugh, as most can probably tell by my style of posting early on.
Originally posted by dadudemonI am not sure what specifically you were referring to then. I asked for clarification for a reason. Now I have it.
It doesn't ****ing matter. I edited it because I didn't want to continue the point. Why is that not enough?
Originally posted by dadudemon
Yes you did. I don't want to be an a**hole to you and show you where you did just for the sake of my winning a trivial argument with you because I like you as a poster and I don't want to alienate you by being a dick.
No, please do. It's been a while since water into wine. We're due another.
Originally posted by dadudemon
What does that mean? Does it mean that your pre-edited post was originally referential to Adam_Poe's post and you edited it because you didn't want to get into it? Indeed, Adam_Poe can be quite that good debater, so I can understand.
See, this is why people find you annoying. I explicitly said it wasn't referring to Adam. All that's missing is the wink smiley. Why would you assume it means something that I have already told you wasn't the case? I know copyright law inside out- I used to work with it. I've no reason to worry.
Do you know what's most annoying about all this? The post doesn't even exist anymore, yet you, yes you, have made it the subject of the last 5 pages. Let it drop. Continue it with the others if you must, but stop referring to it as regards me. It's beyond irritating.
Originally posted by dadudemon
International conspiracy? Now who is being solipsistic?
Dunno. Still you most likely.
Originally posted by dadudemon
No. I have more than a legitimate reason to suspect a joke at my expense. It happens quite often here. You are one of the more intelligent and witty members. Suspecting a joke at my expense from your direction is hardly paranoia. Also considering that I virtually gave a triage of almost complimentary perspectives and listed more than one interpretive perspective, that should lend itself to the conclusion that I took a logical and rational approach. That, in and of itself, is indicative of the anti-thesis of paranoia. Don't mistake intelligence for paranoia.
So you have basically gone to all this trouble to avoid a non-existent 'joke', which would have done much less damage to your reputation than the preceding 5 pages of nonsense?
I'm gonna stick with paranoia then.
Do you remember how you happened to see my original post? Then you quoted it, and by the time you had quoted it, I had already changed it- as evidenced by the fact that it was changed IN YOUR QUOTE?
I'd love to hear the joke I'm planning, it sounds amazing.
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
It doesn't ****ing matter. I edited it because I didn't want to continue the point. Why is that not enough?
It IS enough. I said I was done, but you're not. 😬
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
No, please do. It's been a while since water into wine. We're due another.
You honestly don't remember posting these?
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
I originally said something that wasn't referring to you. When you quoted me, you quoted my second edit, so I didn't, and don't, have a clue what you are talking about.
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
I don't know. I asked you what you were referring to, and you haven't said.
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
I know copyright law inside out- I used to work with it. I've no reason to worry.
Great for you.
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Do you know what's most annoying about all this? The post doesn't even exist anymore, yet you, yes you, have made it the subject of the last 5 pages. Let it drop. Continue it with the others if you must, but stop referring to it as regards me. It's beyond irritating.
No, the most annoying part is butthurt and b*tch boy winning about something that should just have remained as an edited response to your edited post. We wouldn't have "5" pages of idiotic conversation if they would crawl out of my ass. They got bored...oh well.
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
So you have basically gone to all this trouble to avoid a non-existent 'joke', which would have done much less damage to your reputation than the preceding 5 pages of nonsense?
Its not trouble for me. This is quite normal thinking for me. Damage to my reputation? Please.
1. People who actually care about this argument aren't worth trying to be reputable for other than Bardock.
2. This is the internet. Reputations don't matter very much.
3. My reputation was far from hurt. I clearly showed how they were acting like idiots. I backed up all my claims, and I intelligently anticipated a potential joke at my expense.
4. You're not the witty god I used to think you were. Quite normal, actually.
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
I'm gonna stick with paranoia then.
You do that. 😉
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Do you remember how you happened to see my original post? Then you quoted it, and by the time you had quoted it, I had already changed it- as evidenced by the fact that it was changed IN YOUR QUOTE?
You idiot. The data on my screen hadn't updated because these pages are not dynamically linked to the host server. Of course I didn't see you edited post BEFORE I clicked "quote". Because of learned behaviors, I didn't think it would be necessary to check the contents of the displayed text between the bold modifier brackets ("b" and "/b"😉. How often do people delete their entire post and write an entirely new one? Exactly.
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
I'd love to hear the joke I'm planning, it sounds amazing.
I've already explained it to you, son. If you can't remember that far back, stop toking.
Originally posted by dadudemon
No, the most annoying part is butthurt and b*tch boy winning about something that should just have remained as an edited response to your edited post. We wouldn't have "5" pages of idiotic conversation if they would crawl out of my ass. They got bored...oh well.
Funny, since the bickering started when you threw a schoolgirl-like hissyfit (and continue still), simply because I called you "numbnuts". See below:
Originally posted by dadudemon
STFU, you unobservant douche-bag.He edited his post, idiot. I clearly indicated that.
Originally posted by dadudemon*BS*
Literally a ****.
An actual ****. Pathetic.
Those quotes refer to me not knowing what you're talking about. I still wonder. It's just face-saving idiocy. You should be the face of a shovel company or summat.
None of those posts indicate me 'not knowing what I've done'. The first quote quite clearly references my first, edited, post. In fact, shut up. Do you wonder why everyone thinks you're annoying? It's not coincidence. I've probably interacted with you 4 times on here and it's been annoying every time.
I actually re-entered the thread thinking Robtard and chill were being harsh. I realise now it's just a rightful response.
Also, you haven't outlined my joke at all.
Type it out, point by point.
Include how I put up a comment for thirty seconds, hoping you'd quote it, and carefully timed my edit to make you quote the wrong thing. Then skilfully sidetracked the thread for 5 pages, culminating in a hilarious denouement.
Then I can actually do it.
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Literally a ****.An actual ****. Pathetic.
Those quotes refer to me not knowing what you're talking about. I still wonder. It's just face-saving idiocy. You should be the face of a shovel company or summat.
None of those posts indicate me 'not knowing what I've done'. The first quote quite clearly references my first, edited, post. In fact, shut up. Do you wonder why everyone thinks you're annoying? It's not coincidence. I've probably interacted with you 4 times on here and it's been annoying every time.
I actually re-entered the thread thinking Robtard and chill were being harsh. I realise now it's just a rightful response.
Also, you haven't outlined my joke at all.
Type it out, point by point.
Include how I put up a comment for thirty seconds, hoping you'd quote it, and carefully timed my edit to make you quote the wrong thing. Then skilfully sidetracked the thread for 5 pages, culminating in a hilarious denouement.
Then I can actually do it.
K