Originally posted by King KandyYou said that he uses valid logic, but he doesn't.
Did I ever say Quanchi was right?
Originally posted by King KandyAnd yet despite that... trick was still right.
The reason trick never uses any other fallacies is because he never debates outside of ridiculing people.
Quanchi and you use fallacies and are wrong. Trick uses fallacies and is right.
I still think its hilarious that you keep tacitly implying that Trick is in the wrong.
Originally posted by King KandySometimes its better to remain quiet and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
Did I ever say he was wrong?At least he made the effort.
Quanchi's bias is pretty evident. especially with that signature of his.
Originally posted by King KandyAnd you would have been spreading false information to the person who has no knowledge. That's not a very nice thing to do either.
Never said he wasn't. But if someone had no knowledge of the characters involved, I would have done much more to support my case then he had. He did nothing but call me stupid.
Originally posted by King KandyI keep attacking it because its a tacit point you're making.
This is the third time you've attacked a point I never made in the first place... yes he was right. But he did nothing to support his case. Guessing is not debating.
"He never even tried! At least quanchi tried." etc.
He didn't try and was still right. Yoiu stating he didn't use evidence will not change the fact that he was right. You keep trying to take that away or downplay it. but when it coes right down to it you were just as if not more in the wrong than he was. You keep trying to make him seem worse when hes not. Yes, he insults people... that's one or two fallacies. Ad hominem and appeal to ridicule. As opposed to the several that people who use false evidence do?
You can call your erroneous behavior "debating" all you want. but its tatamount to the same thing that you're getting on trick's case for: Bad debating.
And I will point out to you again and again that Trick's Bad debating is greater than your bad debating because he was at least accurate with his conclusion.
Go ahead and say that he didn't use evidence that proves his claims. I will again point out that technically neither did you. False evidence is worse than no evidence.