Originally posted by King KandyNo, it being an invalid argument makes it a bad argument. The only context is that its being selectively applied. Or do you deny he made the argument:
No... the context is necessary because the two parts of the argument are dependant on eachother. Ignoring one makes the other an inconclusive or bad argument.
"X doesn't have impressive battle feats,
Y does have impressive battle feats.
Therefore X loses to Y."
Next I expect Phantom Zone and or Ouallada to come in and start championing his bad logic. Cause birds of a feather flock together.