Battle of the Sexes

not to get involved, dadudemon, but it did seem a lot like you were saying "because I am not as strong as peak physical condition female athletes (or weren't when you felt you were in good shape) men are not on average"

which, as I was trying to point out before, is a total misreading of what is being said. Unless you are saying that you qualify as "peak physical condition". Like, for instance, in highschool I was in swimming and hockey, weighed 200+ lbs and was in good shape. I was not in peak human condition however. Most people aren't genetically able to reach that.

I'm not saying you didn't, but its unlikely enough to be skeptical.

Originally posted by inimalist
not to get involved, dadudemon, but it did seem a lot like you were saying "because I am not as strong as peak physical condition female athletes (or weren't when you felt you were in good shape) men are not on average"

which, as I was trying to point out before, is a total misreading of what is being said. Unless you are saying that you qualify as "peak physical condition". Like, for instance, in highschool I was in swimming and hockey, weighed 200+ lbs and was in good shape. I was not in peak human condition however. Most people aren't genetically able to reach that.

I'm not saying you didn't, but its unlikely enough to be skeptical.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Ok

Poop.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I am not. I wasn't replying sarcastic to your sarcastic comment.

And that's what makes you an idiot...cause you should have gone with wit instead of idiocy.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I was taking it at face value, a very different thing, I'd say. I also realize you were trying to be funny, but you weren't, as it was just flat out wrong.

If it was "just flat out wrong", then why did you say the following:

Originally posted by Bardock42
True.

Originally posted by Bardock42
It's not a diagnosis. Just a hypothetical.

Well, then that changes everything, doesn't it? 😐

Originally posted by Bardock42
Again, like in the other thread, you lie, by misquoting. Not this prompted me to say that you claim to be superior, but this:

That I made the joke about it not really being a very interesting thing you said, is a different matter, it didn't create the following argument.

Nice try. You made fun of me, so I tried to justify my perspective. It started when you made your snide comment. If you had justs said, "Damn...those betches be strong!!!" instead of making fun of me, we wouldn't be here. I don't know how much clearer it could be. But, if it makes you feel better, you can think of it how you want.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I doubt anyone that read this thread was amazed by the worlds strongest woman being stronger than you.

That's obviously what I meant by that. Good job.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I never implied it either. So the answer is, still, "No, I did not have to."

You can play word games all day...still doesn't change the fact that I was making fun of you.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
You're what, 16? How many women have you met? I'm only 19, but I can tell that what you're saying is ignorant shit that you've picked up on from some tired archetype.

Originally posted by dadudemon

And that's what makes you an idiot...cause you should have gone with wit instead of idiocy.

Everyone's a critic, eh?

Originally posted by dadudemon
If it was "just flat out wrong", then why did you say the following:

I was referring to you calling it "be[ing] sarcastic with my sarcastic statements!", which was wrong. Misquoting again, you lying ****.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Well, then that changes everything, doesn't it? 😐

I doubt it.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Nice try. You made fun of me, so I tried to justify my perspective. It started when you made your snide comment. If you had justs said, "Damn...those betches be strong!!!" instead of making fun of me, we wouldn't be here. I don't know how much clearer it could be. But, if it makes you feel better, you can think of it how you want.

True. Which is why I said I can be blamed for the off-topicness. It doesn't change that you claimed to be a superior human male. So, why not relate to what I say instead of your lies?

Originally posted by dadudemon
That's obviously what I meant by that. Good job.

It's what is related to the part you quoted.

Originally posted by dadudemon
You can play word games all day...still doesn't change the fact that I was making fun of you.

It's not word games. I never said I think you are a 40 year old virgin liar. In fact I stated that I assume you are not. Also, you are not very good at making fun of me. There's no reasonable person looking at your posts saying "OH MY, Bardock got owned there. Never saw anyone make fun of someone else like that". In fact, I'd wager that "Wow, that dadudemon is sure an idiot" is the likelier response...as you are unable to follow a straight normal conversation and you lie...a lot.

Originally posted by lord xyz
I'm at a school full of women. Well, girls really. They're very seductive and naive. I think this is a common trait in women. Not all, of course.

???

lol, women being seductive says more about you than them.

naive: pot meet kettle

Originally posted by lord xyz
I'm at a school full of women. Well, girls really. They're very seductive and naive. I think this is a common trait in women. Not all, of course.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Paul Phoenix pwns ALL.

yeah, you're probably right, but steve fox is a beast too

Originally posted by inimalist
???

lol, women being seductive says more about you than them.

naive: pot meet kettle

Originally posted by Bardock42
Many trying to seduce you, eh?

...Easy to seduce.

Originally posted by lord xyz
Maybe seductive was the wrong word.

...Easy to seduce.

You seducing a lot of women, eh?

Originally posted by Robtard
No one forces you to say absurd shit and make ridiculous claims about yourself, yet you do, because you know people will call you on it; so you can then play the victim, as you are now. You've been accused of this before.

K

Originally posted by inimalist
not to get involved, dadudemon, but it did seem a lot like you were saying "because I am not as strong as peak physical condition female athletes (or weren't when you felt you were in good shape) men are not on average"

which, as I was trying to point out before, is a total misreading of what is being said. Unless you are saying that you qualify as "peak physical condition". Like, for instance, in highschool I was in swimming and hockey, weighed 200+ lbs and was in good shape. I was not in peak human condition however. Most people aren't genetically able to reach that.

I'm not saying you didn't, but its unlikely enough to be skeptical.

I agree. My bad...sort of.

An out of shape middle aged man beat a world class athlete in basketball... Mine was a non-chalant anecdotal contrast: a trained male athlete pales in comparison to the world's TOP athletes in both power lifting and track and field. Far from a total misreading...but still not completely comparable.

It was also to draw attention to the higher end feats for women to make "zomg" moments when people saw how strong these women get.

Originally posted by dadudemon

It was also to draw attention to the higher end feats for women to make "zomg" moments when people saw how strong these women get.

It surely was trying to draw attention. Granted.

Originally posted by dadudemon

I agree. My bad...sort of.

An out of shape middle aged man beat a world class athlete in basketball... Mine was a non-chalant anecdotal contrast: a trained male athlete pales in comparison to the world's TOP athletes in both power lifting and track and field. Far from a total misreading...but still not completely comparable.

It was also to draw attention to the higher end feats for women to make "zomg" moments when people saw how strong these women get.

I see what you were saying

but, the middle aged guy thing wasn't the crux of my point. I admit, him beating a WNBA player (lets not forget, strength aside, he is going to be bigger, and more able to move through her and rush the basket [also, I was careful to note that he was both formerly athletic and knowledgeable in the game]) says nothing about men and women in general. Like I have said, I don't think this would apply to me playing hockey against the worlds best females (though I would probably dominate them in the corners/front of the net) or to any 2 particular people in general.

The main point was, in a statistical analysis of performance, top level female athletes perform about as well as top level 16 year old male athletes. And to be honest, 16 isn't all that young. Saying this, it wouldn't be impossible that the strongest individual woman could be stronger than all other men, or that a single WNBA player could beat all men, just that, when taken as a whole, the average female athlete has strength comparable to the average 16 year old male.

Originally posted by lord xyz
I'm at a school full of women. Well, girls really. They're very seductive and naive. I think this is a common trait in women. Not all, of course.

Yes, probably quite common for most people of school age.

Originally posted by lord xyz
Maybe seductive was the wrong word.

...Easy to seduce.

wtf dude?

are you living in the 30s?

"women are easy to seduce"

how about "women enjoy sex like men do [edit]: and finally live in a society where they aren't the property of men and are able to financially determine their wants and desires"

lol

feminism isn't a bad word. It may shock you to find out that most men are much easier to seduce than women are too 😉

Originally posted by inimalist
wtf dude?

are you living in the 30s?

"women are easy to seduce"

how about "women enjoy sex like men do"

lol

feminism isn't a bad word

Originally posted by Bardock42
Dude, you don't understand. They are sluts. They have sex with multiple partners, before marriage. On top of that they enjoy it.

oh, how could they!!!

i mean, after I've spent my youth banging everything that moved, I need to settle down with a virgin who hates sex and needs to be enticed through guile and mental manipulation.

swear to god if she ever looks at another man I'll beat her with my internet porn

Originally posted by inimalist
oh, how could they!!!

i mean, after I've spent my youth banging everything that moved, I need to settle down with a virgin who hates sex and needs to be enticed through guile and mental manipulation.

swear to god if she ever looks at another man I'll beat her with my internet porn

Originally posted by Bardock42
And you have every right to, as she is your posession after marriage.

maybe I was wrong to bash the 30s...

hmmmm

Originally posted by inimalist
wtf dude?

are you living in the 30s?

"women are easy to seduce"

how about "women enjoy sex like men do [edit]: and finally live in a society where they aren't the property of men and are able to financially determine their wants and desires"

lol

feminism isn't a bad word. It may shock you to find out that most men are much easier to seduce than women are too 😉

He's 16 and a virgin... understand now?