IMO!
Galactus at the so-called full power stage,
would be an Omniversal power.
There is no proof,
but there is proof that Galactus is capable of absorbing all of Existence in Marvel.
But the Black Celestial arc is dismiised by some because it was 616 G in the Future.
That's understandable.
But 616 G, on panel,
proved to contain INFINITE energy,
to contain an entire Cosmos.
This shouldn't be too surprising,
Galactus merged with the Infinity Being after all.
Oh, who wins? ... cross-company battles? who
Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes he was able to have damage inflicted on him. So if a heavyweight kept laying it n thick the could eventually beat him. Galactus is a heavyweight and seems more powerful when he is starving and Am was depowered. Galactus un wins him this day.
You either compared Galactus or SMP to Spectre from COIE. 😐 Either way, epic fail.
Spectre is a heavyweight beyond almost any other. The number of beings who can take out Spectre I can probably count on my hands.
It took Spectre+the DCU magi including a 5D imp, the power of the 5 remaining universes, Darkseid channeling AM's one weakness into a blast via Alex Luthor and finally, a full out battle with Pre-Crisis Superman. ❌
2nd time, it took most of the GLC, the Guardians, dropping Warworld for a galaxy-busting explosion, and finally Superman Prime to stop him. AND HE'S STILL NOT DEAD! Not only that, he's powerful enough to power an entire Lantern corp. 👇
There is absolutely no comparison between the two. Anti-Monitor is a multiverse-killing monster at his best. Infinite Multiverses. Nothing in Galactus's entire history comes anywhere near that close. nono
The Anti-Monitor murders him. Anyone who thinks otherwise knows nothing of DC or is a completely biased fool.
Oh, hello durquanchi. Didn't see you there. doped
Originally posted by TricksterPriestGalactus doesnt feel the need to destroy universes but he could consume and destroy at least two in annihilation. He also is powerful enough to feed on Celestials.
You either compared Galactus or SMP to Spectre from COIE. 😐 Either way, epic fail.Spectre is a heavyweight beyond almost any other. The number of beings who can take out Spectre I can probably count on my hands.
It took Spectre+the DCU magi including a 5D imp, the power of the 5 remaining universes, Darkseid channeling AM's one weakness into a blast via Alex Luthor and finally, a full out battle with Pre-Crisis Superman. ❌
2nd time, it took most of the GLC, the Guardians, dropping Warworld for a galaxy-busting explosion, and finally Superman Prime to stop him. AND HE'S STILL NOT DEAD! Not only that, he's powerful enough to power an entire Lantern corp. 👇
There is absolutely no comparison between the two. Anti-Monitor is a multiverse-killing monster at his best. Infinite Multiverses. Nothing in Galactus's entire history comes anywhere near that close. nono
The Anti-Monitor murders him. Anyone who thinks otherwise knows nothing of DC or is a completely biased fool.
Oh, hello durquanchi. Didn't see you there. doped
The un is a lot more powerful than Darkseid and Luthor. He would be weakened or destroyed in no time.
This same blast didnt even destroy Henshaws body fully. Galactus can emit 3 start system destroying blasts when starved. Nova and Annihilus survived this so I guess their durability is right up there with Am who looked much worse off.
To say there is no comparison is being biased and ignorant to Galactus feats.
Originally posted by TricksterPriestAnti-Monitor is a multiverse-killing monster at his best.
Infinite Multiverses.
Where this is stated and/or depicted.
Originally posted by TricksterPriestNothing in Galactus's entire history comes anywhere near that close.
Just sayin, big G is no push-over.
Also, Galactus' destiny is to become the next Marvel Universe.
Again, just sayin. 🙂
Originally posted by Mr Master👆
"Infinite MultiverseS?"Where this is stated and/or depicted.
Galactus contains infinite energy,
and Galactus (future self of 616) was in the process of absorbing the Omniverse.Just sayin, big G is no push-over.
Also, Galactus' destiny is to become the next Marvel Universe.
Again, just sayin. 🙂
Originally posted by quanchi112
Galactus doesnt feel the need to destroy universes but he could consume and destroy at least two in annihilation. He also is powerful enough to feed on Celestials.The un is a lot more powerful than Darkseid and Luthor. He would be weakened or destroyed in no time.
This same blast didnt even destroy Henshaws body fully. Galactus can emit 3 start system destroying blasts when starved. Nova and Annihilus survived this so I guess their durability is right up there with Am who looked much worse off.
To say there is no comparison is being biased and ignorant to Galactus feats.
Whatever metal AM was made of, why do you believe Henshaw wasn't made of it too?
Originally posted by Mr Master
"Infinite MultiverseS?"Where this is stated and/or depicted.
Galactus contains infinite energy,
and Galactus (future self of 616) was in the process of absorbing the Omniverse.Just sayin, big G is no push-over.
Also, Galactus' destiny is to become the next Marvel Universe.
Again, just sayin. 🙂
Ironically, I found the scan in one of your threads. 😂
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f95/t463064.html
History of the DCU part 6. The Monitor called Solomon refers to the multiverse as infinite and then says AM destroyed all but 5. So the MultiverseS might be off, my bad. But it's still far more than Galactus has ever done.
Originally posted by TricksterPriestMultiverse part is off.
Ironically, I found the scan in one of your threads. 😂
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f95/t463064.htmlHistory of the DCU part 6. The Monitor called Solomon refers to the multiverse as infinite and then says AM destroyed all but 5. So the MultiverseS might be off, my bad. But it's still far more than Galactus has ever done.
Galactus doesnt want this. He isnt out to destroy the multiverse. 😬
Originally posted by jadervasonYou made an assumption and tried to pass it off as fact. Again dont make baseless assumptions if you have absolutely nothing backing it up.
[B]WHAT DO I NEED TO PROVEYou're the one who brought Henshaw up, like his durability isn't documented as beyond that of a galaxy.
You have a habit of belittling feats and characters, Quanchi. [/B]
Originally posted by quanchi112
You made an assumption and tried to pass it off as fact. Again dont make baseless assumptions if you have absolutely nothing backing it up.
Assumption? I tried to explain a fact with a theory. The galaxy destroying blast "didn't even" kill Henshaw? So, because Henshaw survived it, it's somehow lesser?
We don't know what he's made of. But the fact is he survived a galaxy destroying blast.
He could easily be the same material as the AM himself. It doesn't really matter.
Originally posted by jadervasonNova and Annihilus survived 3 star systems worth of destruction at the hands of Galactus. They seemed fine. 😉
Assumption? I tried to explain a [B]fact with a theory. The galaxy destroying blast "didn't even" kill Henshaw? So, because Henshaw survived it, it's somehow lesser?We don't know what he's made of. But the fact is he survived a galaxy destroying blast.
He could easily be the same material as the AM himself. It doesn't really matter. [/B]