Originally posted by Schecter
no, just a shred of human decency. imho anyone who laughs at over 100,000 men women and children dead and says '**** em' is a worthless piece of human garbage who should improve society by getting cancer and rotting from the inside. just my opinion though.
OH! So you missed my point then? That's what I thought.
1. I never "laughed" at that in anyway shape or form.
2. I said "**** 'em" to the following type of people:
Originally posted by dadudemon
I don't like people that won't do for themselves and will rather keel over and die rather than fight for their families.
It would appear that you are the "keel over and die" type instead of the "die trying to save my family type". You are one of the lowest pieces of shit scum on the planet and should rot from the inside because you are an utter waste. I already conceded the point that my reasoning was flawed IF they people were not aware of the goods being debated over. Funny how you chose to quote me out of context, isn't it?
Again, you can't hold me to the same standards for human life that you have. You apparently don't have very high standards yourself. You wish and hope death on people who post hear quite often.
Originally posted by Schecter
100,000 innocent humans dead via natural disaster. you say "**** em". and im the piece of scum. ok.
Right, I said "f*ck the 100,000 people who died from that natural disaster". If I didn't say it that way, it was in context, right?
Originally posted by Schecter
oh, dont cry. you're safe in america.
Riiiiight, because there wasn't a tornado mere hundreds of feet from my home a few weeks ago.
Originally posted by Schecter
so watch rambo and tell yourself "thats what i'd be like" while you chug a budweiser longneck, because you're a real man.
1. I haven't seen the movie yet. I will, eventually.
2. I never joined the military because it didn't/doesn't pay well enough...I NEVER wished to be like Rambo...though this is a stupid point to be discussing.
3. Sorry, mate, but I don't drink by myself and/or get drunk and make threads. I hear Budweiser tastes like crap anyway.
4. What IS a "real man", Schecter? Do you know? (Lest you confuse my question as an insult, I am actually curious as to what you define a "real man" as.)
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
You've never had a Budweiser before?
Nope. It's possible that I have tasted, ever so slightly, a Bud, but I have never had one before.
Originally posted by lord xyz
Evidence you don't get sarcasm.
That makes no sense at all when you put his post and my response to his post in context.
I'm going to humor you and explain why your post makes no sense...
My post did not directly address his sarcastically calling me a "real man". My response took into consideration that he was mocking me with sarcasm. My response was to ask him to clarify what a "real man" was BECAUSE he called me a "real man" sarcastically. Capisce?
If you said what you said just to "bait" me, oh well, I explained it anyway and now you can have a laugh. But since I pointed out that you are possibly "baiting" me, then it isn't quite as funny is it?. If you were not "baiting" me, this whole paragraph seems rather odd or out of place. Its oddness is further compounded by the reader's perception of its intended context, but that assumes that the reader posses a degree of pessimism and skepticism(one in the same in some instances.). That is, furthermore, compounded by my mentioning the reader's perception. Now you may be wondering what the reader is thinking after my mentioning the perception of the reader. Is merely mentioning the "reader's perception" altering the readers perception? Is asking that question further altering the reader's perception in the same way that this question may be doing? Your perspective is important because you are primarily the intended recipient, but the reader, who is not you if you haven't guessed, my not have the same interpretation of these words as I intended for you. Whether I intended that or not will be left a mystery for now. Question: Why would I name you the primary recipient? Hint: There are multiple reasons.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
You have to compensate somehow.
Right, because everyone who lifts weights and eats right is compensating for something.......
Wait, don't YOU hate it when people ignorantly generalize about homosexuals? And, yes, I understand your above post is in jest. (I beat you to it, Robtard.)
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
If it is good enough for Robtard, it is good enough for the rest of us.
No it's not. You see, I am the one who makes that determination. If you or Robtard posts the picture, I ask the mods to remove the picture and they warn or even ban the offender for going over the line. I've already asked for it to not be posted which is why I sent it via PM. Please respect my wishes. (I am aware you never threatened to post it and I don't think you would even do such a thing with out my permission, however, since I am an "idiot", I am covering all my bases before it goes there.)
Also, that's out of context. I was referring to a waist down shot, not the waist up shot that I sent Robtard who later sent it-"it" being what you are referring to above-to you.
Indeed, IWBTAIHF.