Originally posted by botankus
Just a personal observation here, but of all the friends I had in college, most of the married ones who were major drunks/potheads have no kids, and most of the married ones who didn't do anything are a Jan, Bobby, and Cindy short of a Brady Bunch.And since a good portion of the latter were fat, I'd assume they consumed a lot of ketchup on fries and burgers.
So you're saying that the argument that beer/pot vs cholestrol is irrelevant? In regards to the descision to abort? Fine.
But which first lady/whore stands to profit most from the propoganda that one is allowed while the other is inexcusable? Booze are legal, now. But weed is illegal, for no better reason than was booze illegal in the 20's.
your point in made substantial in the paramounto's difference between the money made off beer when comapred to ketchup.
Bottom-line being, I don't understand why a rich ***** being part of the campaigne should suddenly matter and/or sway voters for one, but condemn voters when it's the other party. Cindy McCain is indirectly responsible for more sacred and unbirthed deaths' than is Frau Kerry-Heinze's party line-shattering excuses. But, in this election, one magically doesn't matter. Mrs. Kerry is a rich *****. but Frau McCain is not?