Where did God come from?

Originally posted by ushomefree
DigiMark007-

Let me ask you a question: does the Einstein's theory of relativity predict and/or postulate causality "outside" length, width, space, and time? Before you answer, keep in mind, that Einstein's theory of relativity, has been tested exhaustively and remains the most proven theory in ALL scientific inquiry--so strong in fact, that many scientists have contested that the theory of "relativity" be dubbed, "law!" What is your response?

Sigh, plenty of things in science and mathematics are called "laws." They exist that way under those circumstances. Even math is not definite. If you took basic Calculus you should be familiar with intervals.

It is a way for men to give a standard way to research and explain the world.

Stop trying to twist science into something mystic.

No pun intended, but you are a moron.

first off, quantum mechanics is the theory which is the most proven theory in all scientific history. secondly, einstiens theory is not COMPLETE since it breaks down at zero distances which exist singularities. reletivity does not directly postulate anything OUTSIDE space and time as it only applies TO space and time. its predictive powers hence break down at zero distances. it is only a law in the confines of macroscopic non zero value space and time. this is also why it doesnt perfectly reconcile with quantum mechanics, or atleats one of the reasons.

Originally posted by ushomefree
No pun intended, but you are a moron.

No insult intended, but it takes one to know one. 😉

Originally posted by ushomefree
No pun intended, but you are a moron.

isnt that more insulting? 😕

Originally posted by ushomefree
No pun intended, but you are a moron.

You sir, are an ignoramus.

Generally, I ignore your post. You prove nothing. You insult everyone who disagrees, yet you can't tell anyone WHY they are incorrect.

Originally posted by chithappens
You sir, are an ignoramus.

Generally, I ignore your post. You prove nothing. You insult everyone who disagrees, yet you can't tell anyone WHY they are incorrect.

He is a good Christian. 🙄

i'm majoring in Biology, and the more we dwell into macro/microevolution, the more i believe in a higher being exists.

scientists like Richard Dawkins are apparently breaking down the existence of this so called "God", yet 'The God Delusion' is one of the most shallow books ive ever read. It's informative and very interesting, but very shallow and doesnt really answer much.

Dawkins makes Humans seem like primitive creatures. Yes, we are simply metazoans but we are very complex compared to other tetrapods. Birds compute music and unique sounds, dogs learn tricks and have terratorial behaviors, bats have a great sense of smell like most mammals, but when it comes to humans, we have adept capabilities which are infinite.

whenver a professor is asked how something like this could have happened? they either say the universe created it or it happened at random. they say, i'ts based on what you believe.

the term random really 'grinds my gears' (family guy for those that love teh show). random refers to something that doesn't have an aim or a goal, then why does it occur? where's the origin?

same with the term 'evolve'. scientists say that there is no progression or goal. then why evolve in teh first place? to adapt?

i love Biology and the whole field of science, but some things just can't be explained. i could care less if somone believes in a higher being or not. i say morality is more important than religion.

Originally posted by ushomefree
No pun intended, but you are a moron.

There's no pun in that statement.

Originally posted by chithappens
You sir, are an ignoramus.

Generally, I ignore your post. You prove nothing. You insult everyone who disagrees, yet you can't tell anyone WHY they are incorrect.

What exactly have "you" said? I am simply attempting to sift through all the "intellectual snobbery" on this thread! Do you deny the validity of Einstein's theory of relativity? Insult has nothing to do with this, but "objectivity" does!

Are you an infant?

Originally posted by Dr. Leg Lock
scientists like Richard Dawkins are apparently breaking down the existence of this so called "God", yet 'The God Delusion' is one of the most shallow books ive ever read. It's informative and very interesting, but very shallow and doesnt really answer much.

*clap clap clap*

Originally posted by Dr. Leg Lock
same with the term 'evolve'. scientists say that there is no progression or goal. then why evolve in teh first place? to adapt?

Adaptation is the whole point. Things don't evolve for a reason they evolve because that is simply the way it happens.

Originally posted by Dr. Leg Lock
i could care less if somone believes in a higher being or not. i say morality is more important than religion.

👆

Unfortunately that position isn't allowed around here.

Originally posted by ushomefree
What exactly have "you" said? I am simply attempting to sift through all the "intellectual snobbery" on this thread! Do you deny the validity of Einstein's theory of relativity? Insult has nothing to do with this, but "objectivity" does!

Are you an infant?

Why not talk about something relevant rather than using giant text and pointless tangents you desperately hope will confuse others?

Originally posted by ushomefree
What exactly have "you" said? I am simply attempting to sift through all the "intellectual snobbery" on this thread! Do you deny the validity of Einstein's theory of relativity?

The only thing you said was that it was maybe going to be called a "law." Nothing about that makes it "objective" in the sense you are trying to define.

You are making everything difficult.

You don't understand the "simple" and that's what is making things "complex".

chithappens-

Do you respect scientific inquiry, not to mention the progress of knowledge over the past 40 to 60 years?

chithappens-

This is not a trick question, bro!

I assume people takes showers? That's ok right?

Anyways, science is simply a way men understand the world and gives a way in which we all can communicate this understanding.

There are various examples of scientific theory being proven incorrect and then it is replaced by the theory that corrected it.

That being said, I am not even questioning Einstein. But it is completely within reason that it will one day be replaced with a more efficient way to understand the paradigm.

The word "god" came from a primitive people and it carrieed on. To use the word god in a different since, to some people, may be a universe/source, energy, it may be some form/spirit/ feelings.

Originally posted by Deja~vu
The word "god" came from a primitive people and it carrieed on. To use the word god in a different since, to some people, may be a universe/source, energy, it may be some form/spirit/ feelings.

EINSTEIN WAS COOL FOR HIS TIME... 😎

Oh and don't knock the man...............Id marry him....for sure!

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
*clap clap clap*

Adaptation is the whole point. Things don't evolve for a reason they evolve because that is simply the way it happens.

👆

Unfortunately that position isn't allowed around here.

and were the claps sarcastic claps? 😛

Originally posted by Dr. Leg Lock
i'm majoring in Biology, and the more we dwell into macro/microevolution, the more i believe in a higher being exists.

scientists like Richard Dawkins are apparently breaking down the existence of this so called "God", yet 'The God Delusion' is one of the most shallow books ive ever read. It's informative and very interesting, but very shallow and doesnt really answer much.

Dawkins makes Humans seem like primitive creatures. Yes, we are simply metazoans but we are very complex compared to other tetrapods. Birds compute music and unique sounds, dogs learn tricks and have terratorial behaviors, bats have a great sense of smell like most mammals, but when it comes to humans, we have adept capabilities which are infinite.

whenver a professor is asked how something like this could have happened? they either say the universe created it or it happened at random. they say, i'ts based on what you believe.

the term random really 'grinds my gears' (family guy for those that love teh show). random refers to something that doesn't have an aim or a goal, then why does it occur? where's the origin?

same with the term 'evolve'. scientists say that there is no progression or goal. then why evolve in teh first place? to adapt?

i love Biology and the whole field of science, but some things just can't be explained. i could care less if somone believes in a higher being or not. i say morality is more important than religion.

when did dawkins DENY all that?

as for the last part, it occurs because random factors come together to make many things occur. in te COARSE of creating many thing, most things disintegrate from their original form, but a rare few, who have the properties which PROTECT them from disintegratin and help them reproduce and RETAIN their form survive over ther year, and as time passes, so does the number of such surviveable things increases, as such the number of surviveable things themselves becomes a factor influencing the survival of beings in the enviornment and therefore the best of the best survive {this is not due to any PURPOSE bestowed on them, it is simply due to things being formed from random and a rare few things which CAN randomly hold their form together over time, surviving the ages} and this process goes on and on and on and. it doesnt have a GOAL, it is simply survival of those things, which by chance, got the properties necessary for surviving and keeping their form intact{reproduction being perhaps the single most important such trait}. and these are what you see today, or so the theory goes. no purpose, no founder, no goal, just the simple matter of those randomly made things, which cud survive, surviving. no grand scheme or greater being.