Originally posted by Sidi-Boy
Gideon, I'm not gonna get to this debate, but I want to ask you a question;
Very well.
First of all, I'm not denying Anoon Bondara's prodigious technical skill, but nevertheless, you have that fact that pre-TPM Sidious completely outclassed Maul in terms of saber mastery.
First, there are two different schools of thought on this: Nai Fohl tells me that Darth Maul was attacked by his master, effortlessly disarmed, and then was taunted with the fact that Sidious had been training a replacement; Maul then retrieved his lightsaber and attacked with renewed vigor (tapping into one's rage can give one an incredible, temporary advantage: i.e. Obi-Wan Kenobi versus Maul, Luke Skywalker versus Vader) and Sidious "barely deflected" the blows [this supported by the Wookieepedia article] before disarming him a second time. The second school of thought is one subscribed by Lightsnake that Sidious was in control the entire time and laid the smackdown on Maul, despite his rage, with a training saber. I've yet to see the source itself, so I don't know which one is accurate.
Second, do not confuse technical ability with overall combat prowess. Kas'im was a swordsman that outclassed Darth Bane in every manner possible, yet still ultimately lost the duel, because Force prowess > technical prowess. I am not suggesting that Anoon Bondara would defeat Yoda in an all out fight or even in a lightsaber duel, but the fact remains that according to the omniscient narrator, Bondara's technical skills with a lightsaber are second to none in the entire Order, and for a Jedi Master whose career exceeds eight centuries, I doubt the last thirteen years of his profession would yield any significant advancement in ability.
Third, "pre-TPM Sidious" would likely be the most talented incarnation of Sidious as a swordsman. After he became Chancellor, he had no time for training or maintaining swordsmanship and had his lightsaber buried in a statue. While his strength in the Force undoubtably increased, thus making him an overall more terrifying combatant, there is nothing to suggest that his technical ability continued to advance. At best, it stayed the same. At worst, it declined.
And then again, you have the thing that Maul was capable of completely outclassing the most technically skilled lightsaber duelist in the order.
Don't take it up with me; take it up with the omniscient narrator of Shadow Hunter.
Provided Anoon really was better than Yoda in terms of lightsaber skill, then, logically, at the time, Sidious could curbstomp Yoda in a lightsaber duel;
I'm certain that this is a logic trail that brings a smile to your face, but it's irretrievably false. As a technical swordsman, Bondara was unmatched, his skills were more refined than any in the Order. As a combatant, he lacks Yoda's considerably greater Force attunement and mastery, which are even more essential to a warrior in a lightsaber duel.
however, then again, you have the thing that by the events of RotS, Sidious and Yoda were perfectly evenly matched in lightsaber combat ability.
And as I said, the logic trail you use is false.
So- unless you think TPM Maul > RotS Sidious in terms of lightsaber ability, how do you explain this stuff?
By accepting a mentality that accounts for all of the facts.
And then again, you have the fact that TPM Maul was put on his ass by en enraged Padawan. Of course, Maul did defeat TPM Obi-Wan, but still... how come Maul could completely outclass a being of greater technical skill than Yoda and subsequently get put on his ass by a Padawan- albeit a talented one?
Several factors you need to consider.
1.) According to the New Essential Guide to Characters and darthsith19, Darth Maul had been injured or weakened prior to the duel and was thus not in full form.
2.) Obi-Wan happened to catch Maul off guard and merely pressed the advantage; his own thoughts in the Essential Guide to the Force make it explicitly clear that he was still losing and that it was a temporary advantage.
3.) Most important of all, Obi-Wan was pissed off. Haven't you watched the movies at all? Emperor Palpatine makes it explicitly clear during Revenge of the Sith and then Return of the Jedi that giving into one's aggressive feelings allows for an incredibly potent (if temporary) advantage over such things. Giving into his rage allowed Anakin Skywalker to become such a formidable opponent that he defeated Count Dooku, Luke Skywalker overpowered Darth Vader -- a Sith Lord whose mastery of the Force, swordsmanship, and physical strength greatly exceeded his own, and thus Obi-Wan with Darth Maul.
I don't know what to make out of this myself. I suppose it's possible that Yoda completely outclassed Anoon in speed or strength... I dunno.
Bingo.