Odin vs Thanos (Rematch)

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
You should get those eyes checked. Dude, I likened Thanos' fight with Odin to tyrant, a good example of him going all out. You said neither are good examples of him going all out because Thanos must use all his abilities. But it's incumbent upon you now to prove this. Because so far, you haven't even come up with a single example. Don't act like the burden of proof's been shifted. Thanos was using his shielding. Angel Medina doesn't draw Thanos' shields. Why would he handicap himself when it's being specifically stated that he is drawing upon his power? Some artists don't draw Thanos' shields, take the Tyrant fight for instance. And acting like blind-siding Galactus is a worthy feat when even Thanos himself downplays it is ironic.

wrong again.. This is turning into a full time job. I said how me where i asid thanos was or wasn't going all out in his fight with tyrant. I never said either. The onus is on YOU to prove thanos was going all out and back up your statement. I gave you examples of why your statement was ludicris as usual but didn't make the claim. You brought up tyrant as an example of him going all out. Please prove either case. Furthermore, read the story again... Against omega he specifically mentions using three different forcefields to hold him off.. Against Galactus he mentions a mere forcefield. In both cases we SEE the forcefield a clear indication one was there. Against champion again a forcefield was mentioned and we see it. By your theory he has one up everytime.. yet when exchanging blows with various people there appears no forcefield.. hmmmmm. Yet again another case of you ignorning comics and what is stated and shown on panel for your own interpertation. So, when PG Thor and Thanos were exchanging blows.. how could Thanos's nose bleed if he had his forcefield up and always has it up by your theory. HOw could the maker ko thanos in one shot with his forcefield under your theory always up? Hmmmm maybe because it wasn't eh? When we see his forcefield it's there when we don't.. we don't assume it's there.. well people who want to be illogical do I suppose but not the majority.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
wrong again.. This is turning into a full time job. I said how me where i asid thanos was or wasn't going all out in his fight with tyrant. I never said either. The onus is on YOU to prove thanos was going all out and back up your statement. I gave you examples of why your statement was ludicris as usual but didn't make the claim. You brought up tyrant as an example of him going all out. Please prove either case.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Thanos wasn't going all out

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Furthermore, read the story again... Against omega he specifically mentions using three different forcefields to hold him off.. Against Galactus he mentions a mere forcefield. In both cases we SEE the forcefield a clear indication one was there. Against champion again a forcefield was mentioned and we see it. By your theory he has one up everytime.. yet when exchanging blows with various people there appears no forcefield.. hmmmmm. Yet again another case of you ignorning comics and what is stated and shown on panel for your own interpertation.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
So, when PG Thor and Thanos were exchanging blows.. how could Thanos's nose bleed if he had his forcefield up and always has it up by your theory. HOw could the maker ko thanos in one shot with his forcefield under your theory always up? Hmmmm maybe because it wasn't eh? When we see his forcefield it's there when we don't.. we don't assume it's there.. well people who want to be illogical do I suppose but not the majority.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He was losing he hadn't lost yet. You don't wake someone up after koing them to ask them if they yield or not snake eyes.

Odin was winning but how the fight would have ended up is anyone's guess.

Though, not with such gay words.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
You did say Thanos wasn't going all out: You act like I'm making this stuff up. It's simple, Thanos fighting Odin and Tyrant are examples of him going all out. Neither of those have him using a variety of abilities available. Now you're telling me those aren't examples of him going all out because onyl when he uses all his abilities is he going all out. And we are back to square one: Show me an example where Thanos does this. Until then, shut up. I'm a fan of Angel Medina's artwork. He doesn't draw Thanos' shields. Other artists do the same. Even in the instance you refer to where he challenges Omega, the forcefields are never depicted artistically. If you're arguing that it must be depicted and/or narrated that Thanos has his shields up in order for you to assume he has his shields, you'd lose that argument (as I said before). What's funny is you're relying on an argument that Thanos is a fugging idiot and runs into battle not raising his shields against an opponent that outclasses him. It's pretty ironic what some people will do to manufacture excuses for their favorite characters, excuses that end up painting their favorite characters into being complete morons. Those shields were broken by PG Thor. Those shields were broken by Maker. There are instances of people having forcefields up and it not being depicted. Again, even in your Omega example, Thanos' shields were not depicted. And to assume Thanos runs around like an idiot in his fights without having his shields up only debases the character you're campaigning for. At least I don't think Thanos is a moron.

This is becoming a full time job with you ODG... As much as you wanna try and deflect things and put the onus on me... it's squarly on you. Now prove Thanos was going all out or admit you have no proof. You made the claim thanos was going all out and I disagreed and said why I disagreed. However, the fact remains you made a claim you have yet to back up because you can't back it up. As much as you wanna deflect the onus it's clear it remains firmly with you.

Again, where did you common sense go ODG... Logic used to be one of your strong suits.. yet now... not so much. I think you first don't realize thanos has a personal eternal shield so to speak. However, that is much different than hish tech shielding. Very different. Thanos doesn't bring 3 forcefields to battle everytime he does like in the Omega instance. Show me ONE other instance where it mentions Thanos raising 3 shields. Good luck. Furthermore, when Thanos mentions shields crumbling it's cause.. guess what... they are crumbling and he has them up. He SPECICALLY mentions this against Omega, Champion and Galactus. He mentions the forcefields and call them up.. Against Galactus.. he says activate all defensive shields... Or did you forget that part. However, according to you they are always up lol. That right there proves your unsupported theory wrong. What's worse is you keep perpetuating something you have no clue about. So, it's your claim that PG Thor crumbled his shields even though we never see them nor does he mention them crumbling. So.. it's is your theory that PG Thor is greater in a couple blows than Omega, Galactus and PG Champion who all had to work to even break them. All three people I mentioned put forth great effort to break them and are all WELL above Pg Thor. What's worse is the Maker situation... under your theory they crumbled right away with one shot that got through right away. Omega and Galactus fire and sustained powerful blast and his shields take it but are starting to crumble. Against Maker.. she is so powerful and so much more powerful than them that it gets through right away and KO's him? LOL LOL. Where did your logic go ODG. I'm serious. Yet again I have to correct your horrible line or reasoning with logic and reason. The fact is in both cases Thanos didn't call upon his shields. What's worse when classic thor has hit him or even hulk or drax or anybody it gets through.. he's smacked back.. yet according to you it's always on... So we must then assume classic thor, drax, hulk, etc etc all in one punch can get through his shields while Omega, Galactus and PG Champion have to work for it... This has to be a joke right? Certainly you jest right? Admit your wrong ODG because it is clear your dead wrong here.

^ I have to prove Thanos was going all out against Tyrant? Seriously? All the talk about testing his limits both in the Tyrant and Odin fights and it being literally stated in black and white and I have to prove more than that? All this really is has been some facile maneuver to backtrack from your own statement: "Thanos must use all his abilities in order to fairly say he is going all out."

That's the context from which I brought up Tyrant. I brought up Tyrant AFTER you said that. And your statement is the original rebuttal which you pressed onto my suggestion that Thanos was going all out against Odin. It's your positive statement that you have to prove affirmatively otherwise you have no rebuttal. You can't change your rebuttal to "No, wait. Prove to me Thanos was going all out." That may have been a fair question before throwing out that statement, but you decided how you were going to address my claim. You made your own bed, so you sleep in it. But we all know, you're just going to dance around the issue and hope it gets buried without ever having to own up to it. Still waiting for an example.

Angel Medina doesn't draw Thanos' shields. Hell, Jim Starlin didn't either in the Omega fight. You want to paint Thanos as some schmuck who forgets to turn his shields on, that's your prerogative. And what the hell is a personal eternal shield? 😂

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ I have to prove Thanos was going all out against Tyrant? Seriously? All the talk about testing his limits both in the Tyrant and Odin fights and it being literally stated in black and white and I have to prove more than that? All this really is has been some facile maneuver to backtrack from your own statement: Thanos must use all his abilities in order to fairly say he is going all out.

That's the context from which I brought up Tyrant. It is the rebuttal which you pressed onto my suggestion that Thanos was going all out against Odin. It's your positive statement that you have to prove affirmatively. But we all know, you're just going to dance around the issue and hope it gets buried without ever having to own up to it.

Angel Medina doesn't draw Thanos' shields. Hell, Jim Starlin didn't either in the Omega fight. You want to paint Thanos as some schmuck who forgets to turn his shields on, that's your prerogative. And what the hell is a personal eternal shield? 😂

Thanks come again ODG.. You have said nothing of value here yet again. You have yet to prove your statement and back it up. I have a theory... maybe thanos just wanted to engage the both of them without his tech shielding and go toe to toe with them. I'm not sure but what I can tell you is he had no shielding against PG Thor or the many other instances. What is laughable is we've seen drax, Hulk, thing, Classic thor all effect Thanos with their shots and ONE shot at that. Under your theory that ONE shot broke his shielding that stood up to a sustained blast from Galactus and Omega and multiple hits from PG Champion. Don't you get how ridiculous you look right now. Hulk and drax have both effected Thanos ever so slightly with their initial blows.. yet under your theory Thanos shields and all of them are up... hmmm so we must asssume that Drax, hulk, thing and classic thors one strikes are greater than Omega and Galactus. Where did your logic go ODG.. I'm serious, what happened to it? Is this really what your claiming? As idiotic as that is.. then you must also be under the theory that Maker ONE blow is more powerful than a sustained blast from a pissed of Galactus and Omega. During the later he took it and took it and mentions his shields crumbling. Yet against Maker and your theory of his shields being up.. she takes them out with NO effort at all and he's KO'd. Damn she must be pretty damn powerful eh? hmmm i guess him coming back and exchanging blows with her was that badass since her blasts are according to you exponentionally greater than Omegas or Galactus. As I said ODG your looking pretty bad here with this logic of yours. I would back away from it as it's plain terrible.

^ Ah yes, here it is: The "Thanos lowered his shields to screw around" excuse. How original. Also, I am now confused by you asserting that Thanos had no shielding against PG Thor. Because the artist depicted shielding. And the artist even depicted PG Thor breaking through it. Are you just confusing yourself?

And yes, Maker is powerful. She just wasn't stable. Exploitingly so. Which is pretty much the entire plot surrounding their encounter. Sorry you missed that. And we're all still waiting with baited breath about this surefire theory: "Thanos obviously only goes all out when he uses all his abilities." I'm rubbing my hands together in anticipation.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ Ah yes, here it is: The "Thanos lowered his shields to screw around" excuse. How original. Also, I am now confused by you asserting that Thanos had no shielding against PG Thor. Because the artist depicted shielding. And the artist even depicted PG Thor breaking through it. Are you just confusing yourself?

And yes, Maker is powerful. She just wasn't stable. Exploitingly so. Which is pretty much the entire plot surrounding their encounter. Sorry you missed that. And we're all still waiting with baited breath about this surefire theory: "Thanos obviously only goes all out when he uses all his abilities." I'm rubbing my hands together in anticipation.

So one blast from the maker is more powerful than a sustained blast from a pissed off OMega and Galactus? Is this your theory? You have seen Thing, Hulk, Drax and Classic Thor all effect Thanos with mere punches or blasts RIGHT AWAY. This this is true right? Your theory is Thanos shields are always up.. Yet mere blows from this guys has made their way past his "supposed shields that are always up" Care to explain this ODG? I know you can't as usual but I'm really dying to here how this is possible. I know the maker story very well.. She was powerful and I guess Thanos exchanging blows with her is even better than him exchanging blows with Galactus. Afterall, your theory is that one blast from maker is more powerful than a pissed of Galactus blast right? Thus him exchanging blasts with her was damn damn impressive eh? I swear.. correctly your terrible turn in logic these days is a full time job. The facts are these Thanos has called on his shielding in the past by voice. In fact mentions 3 shields against Omega. Calls on his shields against Galactus which Galactus own words claim he's never had to work so hard to pierce a mere forcefield... Pretty damn strong forcefield eh? Yet, we see Maker can penetrate no forcefield shown or mentioned or any mention of them crumbling right away and in one shot. They don't even crumble just right away he's KO'd... hmmm interesting eh? I guess maker's blast are exponentially greater than a pissed off Galactus or Omega blast LOL. What a joke. I'm guessing a simple punch from drax, think, hulk or thor are also greater than Galactus, Omega and CHampion with PG.. Damn man I don't know what happened to you but this train of thought and your logic are down right bad these days.

^ Are you really quantifying Omega's and Galactus' blasts against the Maker's? Your apparent incredulity must be based on some sort of exactingly quantifiable estimation. By all means, share with us how you quantified them against each other so unerringly. Oh... and nice straw-manning: "I guess maker's blast are exponentially greater than a possed off Galactus or Omega blast LOL. What a joke." I found that particular one especially quaint, really.

So now the scoreboard shows you've got two things that have left us scratching our collective heads: (i) we still have no example of a "all out Thanos can only be using all his exotic abilities;" and (ii) you apparently confused yourself when you thought Thanos had no shields against PG Thor. Good show.

Honestly? Half of what you say is a furious bluster entrenched in pseudo-mocking attempts whose only basis comes from straw-manning. The other half of what you say is half-stepping it backwards trying to deflect from sticking your foot in your own mouth. This makes it difficult for me to take your argumentation seriously. And if I sound like I'm preaching some sermon on a soap-box to you as if I had any right to lecture anybody... well... yeah that's exactly what I'm doing right now to you.

Cheers! peaches

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ Are you really quantifying Omega's and Galactus' blasts against the Maker's? Your apparent incredulity must be based on some sort of exactingly quantifiable estimation. By all means, share with us how you quantified them against each other so unerringly. Oh... and nice straw-manning: "I guess maker's blast are exponentially greater than a possed off Galactus or Omega blast LOL. What a joke." I found that particular one especially quaint, really.

So now the scoreboard shows you've got two things that have left us scratching our collective heads: [b](i) we still have no example of a "all out Thanos can only be using all his exotic abilities;" and (ii) you apparently confused yourself when you thought Thanos had no shields against PG Thor. Good show.

Honestly? Half of what you say is a furious bluster entrenched in pseudo-mocking attempts whose only basis comes from straw-manning. The other half of what you say is half-stepping it backwards trying to deflect from sticking your foot in your own mouth. This makes it difficult for me to take your argumentation seriously. And if I sound like I'm preaching some sermon on a soap-box to you as if I had any right to lecture anybody... well... yeah that's exactly what I'm doing right now to you.

Cheers! peaches [/B]

Again more avoiding and deflecting.

1. You made the claim that Thanos was going all out against Odin and Tyrant. You made that claim first correct? Yet it is. Now back up that claim. You have yet to do so and deflect the onus to me, when in fact, you made the initial claim. Damn ODG why do you have to continuing to bring this up and watch you dance around this fact.

2. Your theory is that Thanos always has his shields up.. back that up. prove it. I'm still waiting but do like watching you dance around the proof.

3. I gave you examples... Are these not true.. Was Galactus, Omega and PG Champion pissed off at Thanos and trying to kill hiim or put him down? Simple question we all know the answer to. Now, did Omega and Galactus fire a sustained blast at Thanos which his shields held up to? Again we know the answer. Was Galactus blast so strong that it made Galactus say.. he's never had to work so hard to pierce a mere forcefield. The is Yes again. lastly, did all these case takled about thanos shields, activating them and them crumbling. The answer is Yes. Okay now that we got this out of the way.... proceed to 4

4. You claim his shields are always up... okay lets work with that premise. They why does he call on them and mention them in the Galactus, Omega and Champion situtation if they are always up? Isn't redundant? According to you they are always up.. hmmmmm

5. Furthmore, The maker got through them with her first shot and immediatly true or no? He was Ko'd. She didn't have to fire a sustained blast at him like Galactus or Omega or punch it multiple times like Champion. She got through right away and Ko'd him. So by your theory we must assume
maker blast > Galactus/Omega/PG Champion punches right? If not then tell me why not under your theory of him having his shields always up

6. We've seen Classic Thor, Drax, Hulk and countless others blast or punch Thanos. We've seen this effect him even if slightly. He's been punches and it clearly gets through as we see his head move back or he moves back. Okay so those simple punches must have crumbled his shields in no time, where as in the others situations like with Galactus they took a sustained blast from a pissed off Galactus. So, please explain how mere punches can get through his shields in one shot?

This is honestly not becoming fun anymore ODG. You used to be very logical and reasonable.. However now, it's the complete opposite. Look at your crazy assertions here and tell me it's not silly. Anyways, I'm going to love to see you explain these examples disproving your theory or you can just say maker blasts/hulks punches>than Omega, Galactus sustained blasts.. lulz. comical.

^ It's quite simple really. You're asking me to justify and explain to you what Thanos going "all out" is. Let's face it, you already have an entrenched opinion that preemptly dismisses any justification I could give you. How do we know this? Because you clearly defined what you believe an "all out Thanos" is. So this isn't a question of me justifying my initial position. No, it's a question of which of us is "right." So I asked you to simply give an example of an "all out" Thanos. Very simple query. You then asked me to completely explain my theory from scratch as you don't accept my representative examples.

So which is easier? You just posting an example. So which query came first? Mine. Against this backdrop, do you really expect me to waste my time (i) fleshing out a theory which you've already rejected up-front, and (ii) take your burden of proof antics seriously? We're still waiting for you to provide an example of an "all out" Thanos.

As for your arguments that (i) Thanos drops his shields in serious fights for sh1ts and g1ggles, or (ii) Thanos must consciously activate his shields because they're not up by default, or (iii) that characters being touched and/or moving their heads or body parts around when attacked = shields are down... then I have several responses:

(i) That's retarded. It's a purely nonsensical projection onto the comic's events simply for the sake of aggrandizing. It's about as dumb as someone suggesting that in some of Doom's fights, "he only sets his armor to 50% capacity for sh1ts and g1ggles and you can't prove he didn't, so nyah nyah." Seriously? (ii) This is equally retarded. Thanos almost never (if ever?) utters, "personal shields up," they just are up. There are just as many (if not more) Thanos fights where he doesn't talk about his shielding, but they are up. For you to act like he can never have them up unless the artist/writer depicts some verbal command activation goes against common sense. (iii) Characters being touched and/or moving their heads or body parts around when attacked =/= shields are down. You read enough comics, you'd know this. Want an example? Look at Extremis Iron Man and Dr. Doom's fight in my Revamped Dr. Doom Respect Thread. You see them grappling with each other, twisting their arms about, and all the while, their shields are up and being drained. Explicitly so. That's just one example off the top of my head.

In essence, you're arguing that Thanos is an idiot retard who goes into fights without his shields up. That's not true. You also argued that Thanos must conciously call his shields up, otherwise they're off. That's not true either. You also argued that being touched/having your body parts flail around from attacks = shields are down. That's not true either. Take a breath. Stop working yourself up. In your fervor to get the last word (to deflect from your asinine statements earlier) you're beginning to rely on even more asinine reasoning. Seriously, stop.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ It's quite simple really. You're asking me to justify and explain to you what Thanos going "all out" is. Let's face it, you already have an entrenched opinion that preemptly dismisses any justification I could give you. How do we know this? Because you clearly defined what you believe an "all out Thanos" is. So this isn't a question of me justifying my initial position. No, it's a question of which of us is "right." So I asked you to simply give an example of an "all out" Thanos. Very simple query. You then asked me to completely explain my theory from scratch as you don't accept my representative examples.

So which is easier? You just posting an example. So which query came first? Mine. Against this backdrop, do you really expect me to waste my time (i) fleshing out a theory which you've already rejected up-front, and (ii) take your burden of proof antics seriously? We're still waiting for you to provide an example of an "all out" Thanos.

As for your arguments that [b](i) Thanos drops his shields in serious fights for sh1ts and g1ggles, or (ii) Thanos must consciously activate his shields because they're not up by default, or (iii) that characters being touched and/or moving their heads or body parts around when attacked = shields are down... then I have several responses:

(i) That's retarded. It's a purely nonsensical projection onto the comic's events simply for the sake of aggrandizing. It's about as dumb as someone suggesting that in some of Doom's fights, "he only sets his armor to 50% capacity for sh1ts and g1ggles and you can't prove he didn't, so nyah nyah." Seriously? (ii) This is equally retarded. Thanos almost never (if ever?) utters, "personal shields up," they just are up. There are just as many (if not more) Thanos fights where he doesn't talk about his shielding, but they are up. For you to act like he can never have them up unless the artist/writer depicts some verbal command activation goes against common sense. (iii) Characters being touched and/or moving their heads or body parts around when attacked =/= shields are down. You read enough comics, you'd know this. Want an example? Look at Extremis Iron Man and Dr. Doom's fight in my Revamped Dr. Doom Respect Thread. You see them grappling with each other, twisting their arms about, and all the while, their shields are up and being drained. Explicitly so. That's just one example off the top of my head.

In essence, you're arguing that Thanos is an idiot retard who goes into fights without his shields up. That's not true. You also argued that Thanos must conciously call his shields up, otherwise they're off. That's not true either. You also argued that being touched/having your body parts flail around from attacks = shields are down. That's not true either. Take a breath. Stop working yourself up. In your fervor to get the last word (to deflect from your asinine statements earlier) you're beginning to rely on even more asinine reasoning. Seriously, stop. [/B]

So again you don't want to prove your case… cool all you had to do was say so. I've know this for sometime now. Again you continue to dodge my questions…..

1. First I never claimed he has to call up his shields via voice command all the time. What I asked you is why in those 3 instances did he call them up? If they are always on as you claim.. why would he need to say.. active all defensive shielding? Please do explain this

2. You wrote all that and continue to dodge and deflect. It's your theory that just because Hulk punches thanos and his head moves doesn't mean he has no shields.. Interesting… Okay I will play along… Then explain to me.. how one hulk, drax or thing punch can make it through shielding that taxed Galactus reserves and shielding the likes he's never seen before? Please explain how one punch can get through his shield or tax his shield.. yet it took omega and long sustained blast and it still wasn't crumbled. Explain how Champion was punching thanos SHIELD which we clearly see and nothing was happening to Thanos. No head movement no indication it even touched Thanos. Yet one punch from hulk, drax and thing go right through the same shielding and cause his head to move from obvious contact? Please again don't dodge the explains explain how this is even possible

3. You dodged this again.. So are you are claiming that a blast from The Maker is more powerful than a sustained blast from a pissed off Galactus and Omega. It has to be because one got through his "shielding" immediately and KO'ed him. While the others… couldn't penetrate his shields with long sustained blasts. So, your claiming The Maker's blasts are more powerful correct?

4. Lastly, why do I have to continue to wreck your horrible comparisons and analogies. Just because thanos chooses to not employ his tech shielding all the time doesn't mean he's fighting stupid. That would be like me saying... Unless DS employs all his powers everytime he fights he's fighting stupid. Nope can't say that. Just because Thor doesn't use all his powers each and every fight he's fighting stupid. We don't say that do we. We don't because that is how comics are written that is why he have a rule on KMC about fighting to their potential. Why? because in comics this doesn't always occur or why would we have this rule right? Thus thanos using or not using his tech shielding is no indication of him fighting stupid or not that is just par for the course for each and every comic book character. Man ODG I must admit this is getting tiring.. I continue to prove your examples and analogies wrong time and time again. You continue to dodge my questions time and time again. It's amusing if nothing else.

So dodging and address the examples given.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thanos wasnt phased by Wolverine. Your opinion matters not and I am welcome to mine thank you very much.

Odin tried and couldnt even put Thanos down and he had more than enough time to do it. Thanos ftw.

I keep seeing you say this, but in the scan showing Odin giving props to Thanos, he is clearly on his knees while Odin is standing tall... So he put him down. He might not have stayed down, but he was clearly down.

Let me ask you if you had to choose a winner from that fight, who would it be? NO STALEMATE!!

I could see you picking Thanos if their first fight were close, but it wasn't. Thanos did no damage to Odin.

Originally posted by Blanket
You do if they're pissed off and they're not fighting in a sanctioned fight...

Though, not with such gay words.

Originally posted by snyper1982
I keep seeing you say this, but in the scan showing Odin giving props to Thanos, he is clearly on his knees while Odin is standing tall... So he put him down. He might not have stayed down, but he was clearly down.

Let me ask you if you had to choose a winner from that fight, who would it be? NO STALEMATE!!

I could see you picking Thanos if their first fight were close, but it wasn't. Thanos did no damage to Odin.

It's speculation as to who would have won. I can't pick a winner because the fight hadn't ended.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Dana White would never allow this. So? It's not a victory unless you ko or beat someone. Thor was buried underneath a mountain before against the Hulk. He eventually recovered in a lot more time than it took Thanaos to get up

It's speculation as to who would have won. I can't pick a winner because the fight hadn't ended.

You ever watch a boxing match or MMA fight? They ever go to a decision? Ok. All I am asking you to do is pick a winner from what we saw, same as you would in a boxing or MMA match.

You won't though because you would have no choice but to say Thanos Lost.

Originally posted by snyper1982
You ever watch a boxing match or MMA fight? They ever go to a decision? Ok. All I am asking you to do is pick a winner from what we saw, same as you would in a boxing or MMA match.

You won't though because you would have no choice but to say Thanos Lost.

Also the fight did end, otherwise they would still be fighting. The only way to declare a winner in such circumstances is by damage dealt. Thanos got destroyed. If similar amounts of damage were dealt by both partys, then you can declare a stalemate, otherwise man up and declare a winner. Stop being a fanboy and be objective.

Just like when Machida beat Tito Ortiz. Even though Tito didn't look all beat up, he got his ass handed to him. Same with Thanos.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Fights in comics don't go to decisions. He didn't lose the fight though. That's the point. Odin has his chances and failed to get the job done.

That is not what I am asking. I am asking you To PICK A WINNER on what we saw. Geez.

KuRuPT Thanosi: Hey, schmuck. Let's do a quick recap:

1) You said Thanos going all out must use all his abiltities. You still haven't even provided or alluded to even a single example.

2) You said Thanos didn't use shields against PG Thor. You apparently didn't even read the fight because that's utterly wrong.

3) You act like if Thanos is touched/his body is moving around from attacks, then his shields must be destroyed. Wrong again. You'd know this if you read comics.

Anything else you typed is straw-manning. I never said classic Thor, Hulk or Drax one-shotted his shields. I said they hit him and Thanos still had his shields up, despite the shields not being explicitly depicted/referred to. His body reacting to attacks is not dispositive of his shields being drawn. As I already proved. And since it's completely retarded to assume Thanos walks into fights like a disabled monkey without his shields, then you have to prove he eschews their use. And not once has Thanos ever mentioned/intimated that he was deactivating his shields. So wrong again. And since you're able to deny the Maker's power, why don't you comparatively quantify her power compared to Galactus'/Omega's?

Or don't. Obsessing over the last word is only amplifying the exposure of your ludicrous arguments. I'd tell you to cut your losses, but there's nothing you can really salvage at this point. So keep it up, if it let's you sleep better at night.

Originally posted by snyper1982
Also the fight did end, otherwise they would still be fighting. The only way to declare a winner in such circumstances is by damage dealt. Thanos got destroyed. If similar amounts of damage were dealt by both partys, then you can declare a stalemate, otherwise man up and declare a winner. Stop being a fanboy and be objective.

Just like when Machida beat Tito Ortiz. Even though Tito didn't look all beat up, he got his ass handed to him. Same with Thanos.

The fight didn't end so I can't pick a winner. Standoff.