Originally posted by Batman-PrimeClones have fooled abstracts before. I have never seen it mentioned in an ann bio or Thanos bio. It's an obvious joke squeezed in at the end of an issue.
Signifficant issues = canon. In that "signifficant issue" statement from the Watcher that it is the real Thanos and no clone = real Thanos down.It can't become clearer then this.
http://www.marvunapp.com/Appendix/sqlgrl.htm
Squirrel girl defeats thanos. 😛
Originally posted by quanchi112
Clones have fooled abstracts before. I have never seen it mentioned in an ann bio or Thanos bio. It's an obvious joke squeezed in at the end of an issue.
Not everything is important enough to be mentioned in an bio. Superman's bios doesn't list all fights he won or lost... That argument is stupid.
This wasn't a clone else it would have been specifically rectonned.
Originally posted by Silent MasterI find it interesting that he's so against it ever happening.
I find it interesting that he's basically arguing that bios trump the comics.
Everybody else accepts it, but not quan... because not only is it not canon, but it's a clone (neither stated, and only need one excuse).
Originally posted by JuntaiI don't think so.
Her beating Thanos is in SG's marvunapp bio [as is Watcher telling her it's not a clone] and in significant issues in her Marvel.com bio. It's clearly canon.
Originally posted by rotiartI don't think the editors over at marvel agree that it's canon to the real Thanos.
http://www.marvunapp.com/Appendix/sqlgrl.htmSquirrel girl defeats thanos. 😛
Originally posted by Batman-PrimeI have given my reasoning as to why it isn't canon.
Not everything is important enough to be mentioned in an bio. Superman's bios doesn't list all fights he won or lost... That argument is stupid.
This wasn't a clone else it would have been specifically rectonned.
Originally posted by BlanketI'm just using common sense here.
I find it interesting that he's so against it ever happening.Everybody else accepts it, but not quan... because not only is it not canon, but it's a clone (neither stated, and only need one excuse).
Originally posted by Batman-PrimeI don't see some of these things as being official when we've never seen this stuff in anything Thanos related.
Ok now we need a personal letter from the Marvel editors to prove that it's canon. 😐
Why not stand lee or the CEO. Or better Starlin. And even then it wouldn't be enough, maybe a video? No one could fake that too.There is no reason behind your "reasoning" just fanboy-rage.
Sg's a joke character, dude.
Originally posted by Kris BlazeNot the real Thanos.
Squirrel Girl took down Thanos.Marvunapp and Marvel.com however, prove absolutely dick.
Originally posted by quanchi112
It's funny to me how people are arguing marvel recognizes this as a legitimate piece of Thanos' history and have no proof to show for it.
Oh I agree!
It could have just as easily been canon than if it were not.
I always argue the point of SG actually having the ability to beat Anybody!
Her limits haven't been set yet. So its a free for all.