Originally posted by Silent MasterOdin was going all out. Just because he couldnt put Thanos down,Thanos haters came up with this myth that he wasnt going all out. He oneshotted the Surfer yet Thanos' full might had no been tested since his resurrection.
So, what you're saying is that the Thanos fight showed that a high end Odin "going all out" couldn't beat Thanos, therefore current Thanos would win.Is that correct?
Thanos beat the Maker afterwards a being of infinite power. This was after his final upgrade.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Odin was going all out. Just because he couldnt put Thanos down,Thanos haters came up with this myth that he wasnt going all out. He oneshotted the Surfer yet Thanos' full might had no been tested since his resurrection.Thanos beat the Maker afterwards a being of infinite power. This was after his final upgrade.
Let's try this again; So, what you're saying is that the Odin vs Thanos fight showed that a high end Odin "going all out" couldn't beat Thanos, therefore current Thanos would win.
A simple Yes or No will do.
Originally posted by quanchi112He wasn't inflicting any damage to Odin, either. This match, and Thano's blasting Galactus are a bit overrated, IMO; this one is because while Thanos showed his durability in taking Odin's attacks, he didn't even dent Odin IIRC.
Odin was pulling out weapons and such. Thanos took everything and still wasnt backing down.
Originally posted by Silent MasterI saw Odin couldnt put him down. He was going all out. Thanos has become more powerful since then. You can disagree with me but unless you prove Odin became more powerful you cant change my mind.
Let's try this again; So, what you're saying is that the Odin vs Thanos fight showed that a high end Odin "going all out" couldn't beat Thanos, therefore current Thanos would win.A simple Yes or No will do.
Originally posted by HarbingerHe was upgraded after this. He beat the Maker and physically hurt a being with infinite power.
He wasn't inflicting any damage to Odin, either. This match, and Thano's blasting Galactus are a bit overrated, IMO; this one is because while Thanos showed his durability in taking Odin's attacks, he didn't even dent Odin IIRC.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I saw Odin couldnt put him down. He was going all out. Thanos has become more powerful since then. You can disagree with me but unless you prove Odin became more powerful you cant change my mind.
Please stop dodging and just answer my question, A simple yes or no is all that is needed.
The question was, So, what you're saying is that the Odin vs Thanos fight showed that a high end Odin "going all out" couldn't beat Thanos, therefore current Thanos would win.
Once again, a simple "yes' or "no" is all that is needed.
Man I was hoping for a serious debate and then Quan comes and turns it to complete comedy. Awnser me this, has Odin ever been a cold blooded killer...did he want to kill thanos...no he didnt. He wasnt bloodlusted or looking for the kill, hence he wasnt going all out. In this fight, its on neutrel ground with no one getting in the way...which means Odin will released one of his galaxy busting blast and toast Thanos 10000/10
Originally posted by Silent Master
Please stop dodging and just answer my question, A simple yes or no is all that is needed.The question was, So, what you're saying is that the Odin vs Thanos fight showed that a high end Odin "going all out" couldn't beat Thanos, therefore current Thanos would win.
Once again, a simple "yes' or "no" is all that is needed.
I don't think you'll be getting the answer you're looking for. 😉
In any case, my take was that it was an average (maybe below average) Odin who was definitely trying to kill Thanos. His statements and actions certainly are congruent with this, and are more believable than the lack of collateral damage. For example, I don't really remember G's first battle with T/A having much in the way of collateral damage.
I think that the battle was actually a good durability showing for Thanos, and in a way was good for Odin as well, as save a truncated fight with Tyrant, Thanos has doled out damage to most of his other opponents, or at least mounted some offense. Odin handled him like a child, but simply couldn't put him down within the time period. I think that fight established just how powerful skyfathers actually are, and how far they are from heralds and characters on Thanos' level. It also signalled, in my opinion, that having a varied yet powerful offense of some kind is almost a pre-requisite to be a skyfather level in terms of power.
My simple answer? No. Odin would take 10/10 once again. With sizeable prep? Thanos MIGHT take a few.
Originally posted by batdude123
Right, because Odin is always at "galaxy busting" levels? And for that matter, he's only going all-out when he destroys a galaxy? Didn't he use Gungnir to try and end the fight quicker?Not trying to say Odin was going 100% in that fight, but I'm just pointing out the logistical flaws with your statements.
When the situation requires it, yes.
No, but it's an fairly accurate gauge.
No, as Gungnir does nothing more than channel his power into more direct blast.