Originally posted by dadudemonI don't know if you've heard but Christians say you must accept Jesus as your saviour, and all that other crap to get into heaven. They also say only christians get into heaven, meaning that you must do that to be a christian.
Welll....the organization that your membership records are stored with will still claim you as a member and therefore you are counted amoung the Christians still. The only way around it is to have your name removed from their records.That way, if you are randomly selected for a poll when it comes to atheism compared to theism, the numbers won't be skewed.
😐
😐
1234
Spoiler:
I don't.
Originally posted by lord xyz
I don't know if you've heard but Christians say you must accept Jesus as your saviour, and all that other crap to get into heaven. They also say only christians get into heaven, meaning that you must do that to be a christian.Spoiler:
I don't.
Dude, I wasn't serious.
If Barack makes weed legal, he will be the best president in the history of the US.
Originally posted by Strangelove
he was talking about Hillary Clinton, not the Human Rights Campaign.But you probably knew that already.
I did. But I saw a chance to address the hypocrisy of the HRC. It makes one wonder why they subscribe to a lobby when that lobby will sell you out the moment the majority of the money comes from some where else.
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
That time were we referring to Hillary or the Human Rights thing?Also, really... as a general question... what's so bad about lobbyists?
Barack Hussein Obama or the cable channel: Home Box Office? Hillary Rodham Clinton or the Human Right's Campaign?
In definition, there is nothing wrong with lobbyists, except when they become the defining factor in the government. The goals of one group, supposedly equal in consideration to another, default to being represented by a lobbyist is a good thing. But when the group being represented by, not the objective espoused, but the unserving people who control the lobby and then fund the power behind the lobbyist, neither the sloagan or the people or the objective are served. If lobbyists actually served the cause they espouse, then they woud be a benefit. But since they are mostly serving the men who hold the purse strings, they become a liability. So, they should be done away with, as a whole.
So I take it you're not a fan of Big Oil, Big Tobacco or Big Pharma...
Since the premise of this thread is retarded I'm going to pose questions that have been popping up for me. Could someone elaborate for me what a "different kind of politics" is supposed to entail? No Big Oil, Big Tobacco or Big Pharma allowed?
No, what I think is that they shouldn't be a crux of the laws, propogana and policy of our government.
And I certainly realize they're a part of Mr. Obama's ideas for government; as they are with Mr. McCain's and Mrs. Clintons'
But if we can't actually vote for our best interest, then we should vote for what most considers our self-interests, shouldn't we?
Originally posted by dadudemonIt's hard to tell with you.
Dude, I wasn't serious.If Barack makes weed legal, he will be the best president in the history of the US.
Originally posted by KidRockRepublicans like you and Sithsaber.
Who here would consider Obama a Socialist?
I would've said ignorant ****tarded republicans, but that implies there are republicans who aren't.