Forgiveness

Started by Grand_Moff_Gav9 pages
Originally posted by Mandos
It's horrible, but beautiful... at least creative?

Sacrilege is the word i was thinking of...

(nah im not that serious haha)

Though, i would be a hyprocrite if I said I approved...

To read or think on your own is sacrilege. To have a mind makes that statement true also.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You are correct on the mythology, my bad. Bodhisattvas are what are returning, not Buddhas. However, I hope you realize that this is just mythology, and should not be taken literally.

yes but isnt that also buddhism, mythology or reality?{that wud generally be between the view point u take as most people wud see it, buddhists wud claim that much of these fundamentals are real while non buddhists wud probably say that they are mythology} why do u, being a buddhist, think that sumthin that central is mythology?

Originally posted by leonheartmm
yes but isnt that also buddhism, mythology or reality?{that wud generally be between the view point u take as most people wud see it, buddhists wud claim that much of these fundamentals are real while non buddhists wud probably say that they are mythology} why do u, being a buddhist, think that sumthin that central is mythology?

No one can know the true nature of reality. However, we live in the true nature of reality. Mythology is the way we communicate the glimpses we have of this true nature.

Because something is mythology does not mean it is a lie. It only means that what we know cannot be conveyed in an easily understandable way. Mythology allows us to understand something that cannot be understood. It is like describing a color to a blind man; no matter how you describe the color, the blind man will never see it.

^but isnt abstraction and emotive quotation/creating parallels between some common experience, a better way to convey that partially unconveyable expirience? i mean, very often mythology can be vastly misrepresentative and manipulative. also, y do u think sumthing that central to buddhism is mythology?

Originally posted by leonheartmm
^but isnt abstraction and emotive quotation/creating parallels between some common experience, a better way to convey that partially unconveyable expirience? i mean, very often mythology can be vastly misrepresentative and manipulative. also, y do u think sumthing that central to buddhism is mythology?

Why do you think that what happen to you after you die is central to Buddhism? Buddhism is not about the after life; Buddhism is about life. The reason for mythology is to convey information from one generation to the next. Mythology is not about the supernatural; it is about the human condition over time. There is no other way to convey information over thousands of years.

The mythology of Buddhism, or any mythology, is not stand alone. You have to have a practice, and study. Then mythology can open your mind to information that is as old as the human race.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Sacrilege is the word i was thinking of...

(nah im not that serious haha)

Though, i would be a hyprocrite if I said I approved...

Srry, it will be a one time only 😉

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Why do you think that what happen to you after you die is central to Buddhism? Buddhism is not about the after life; Buddhism is about life. The reason for mythology is to convey information from one generation to the next. Mythology is not about the supernatural; it is about the human condition over time. There is no other way to convey information over thousands of years.

The mythology of Buddhism, or any mythology, is not stand alone. You have to have a practice, and study. Then mythology can open your mind to information that is as old as the human race.

true, as that may be. what i was actually asking you was why you considered it MYTHOLOGY and not FACT, seeing as your a buddhist urself.

Originally posted by leonheartmm
true, as that may be. what i was actually asking you was why you considered it MYTHOLOGY and not FACT, seeing as your a buddhist urself.

The answer is simple; I always discount people who seem to know what happens to us after we die. That is information that us humans can never have, including myself.

What about NDE? They are all different from all walks of life? When I read all of them I come to the conclusion that it is different from one person to the other, yet none said it was a "Nothing experience."

Originally posted by Deja~vu
What about NDE? They are all different from all walks of life? When I read all of them I come to the conclusion that it is different from one person to the other, yet none said it was a "Nothing experience."

People who had NDE did not die. We know so little about he human body and mind. We sometimes think someone is dead when they are not.

Not always so by some studies...............so, there. 😛

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
The answer is simple; I always discount people who seem to know what happens to us after we die. That is information that us humans can never have, including myself.

but at the same time, you do still beleive in reincarnation, true?

Originally posted by leonheartmm
but at the same time, you do still beleive in reincarnation, true?

In a way. The belief in reincarnation is only a minor part of my Buddhist practice. It is so unimportant that it is not at all a required to believe in it.

^yes but from your posts, it seems that you use it to partially make sense of the concept of karma, which i do beleive is significant.

Originally posted by Deja~vu
some studies

such as?

Some studies as he was talking about.

Originally posted by leonheartmm
^yes but from your posts, it seems that you use it to partially make sense of the concept of karma, which i do beleive is significant.

I do not use reincarnation to make sense of Karma. I use Karma to make sense of reincarnation.

Youre such a Buddhist. LOL

erm wait, how is that, if permanent karma affects next lives than reincarnation is a REQUIREMENT. without it, the concept of karma wudnt make sense. so isnt it reincarnation which is justifying the view of karma in this scenario and not the other way around???