Originally posted by Utrigita for all we know
Galactus could work the same way Psi-Lord antimatter blast did imploding the universe.
"Like Psi-Lord did?" ...
... So now you're going to bring unsupported speculation into the debate.
....................................................................................................
"for all we know" ...
....................................................................................................
What we know is that Galactus released his power,
his real power, the power he uses to battle,
and ONLY 3 Solar Systems were destroyed.
"Herald my RAGE!"
btw. There's like over 100 Billion Star Systems in the Milky Way Galaxy.
....................................................................................................
So incredible was his 616/Negative Zone destroying power,
that Annihilus shield's himself and survives:
....................................................................................................
So incredible was his 616/Negative Zone destroying power,
that Nova shield's himself, while simultaneously protecting Phyla-vell & Peter:
....................................................................................................
I suppose you think their all above Eternity too? ... 🙂
Originally posted by Utrigita all we know is that Thanos found the scenario very real indeed.
"all we know"
All we know is that hungry Galactus got stomped by Rachel,
but somehow you believe hungry Galactus is above Eternity.
Ut, I think you're cool, but, this isn't looking good.
I sincerely hope you're just playing around.
Originally posted by Utrigita No I isn't again the difference is that Galactus has been put directly into a context that describes how he can bring about the destruction of the 616 reality and the negative zone, Quasar, Thor and Rachel has never been put into that context that they can be used to destroy two universes has they?
Rachel has never destroyed Two Universes,
not even one, (just like hungry Galactus has never either)
but she stomped hungry Galactus.
Originally posted by Utrigita Which was my point you said on panel which wasn't correct
as it wasn't shown I isn't disagreeing with the writer just you choice of words
My choice of words were right on point dude.
On Panel the writer described what happened,
doesn't need to be shown,
John Byrne wasn't speaking hypothetically,
ol' Johnny (in detail) explained what happened.
And if (with his name printed) on panel
he personally said what happened,
then it happened.
Like I said, his name is clearly in red bold,
to assure us it's how the story ends.