Originally posted by BackFire
There are plenty of good serial killer movies.Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer is the best one.
Theron was good in Monster.
One thing funny about Monster, is that here we finally have a role for a fat ugly woman, but instead of casting one, they take Theron and use make-up to make her ugly.
Originally posted by dadudemon
No worries.I was making more of a general statement. Zeal was obviously NOT talking generally but his statement was general. I thought it important to put out there that some people love and crave negative attention. It's possible that there could be a pedo out there who loves people being afraid of him...but I don't know of any.
Originally posted by RocasAtoll
Considering we're talking about teenagers, they would've be getting torn, it would already be adult sized.
A 12 year old girl is developed enough to comfortably take a 40 year old man?
Without going into detail here, because it's gross, I'm willing to bet most 12 year old girls would need stitches.
To be fair, I'm trying to argue against pedophilia and I've got people trying to tell me I'm wrong, which is confusing me a little 😬
(I understand that I'm also arguing for the public humiliation of pedophiles which some don't agree with, but that seems to have been left behind).
I also said 'most' 12 year old girls would need stitches, I agree some might be further developed.
Originally posted by Syren
To be fair, I'm trying to argue against pedophilia and I've got people trying to tell me I'm wrong, which is confusing me a little 😬
Technically your arguing against child molestation/rape. There's nothing you can say against pedophilia except that it's "icky" or "wrong" for whatever reason.
I was being sarcastic with the "kiddie-****ers", though I do get the impression that there are at least a few people in here that hold a "if the 14 year old girls asks a grown man to **** her, then it's fine" stance.
I know you didn't say that, your argument is that it isn't purely the man's fault, which I disagree. They engage the decoys and they drive to the house. If they didn't, then there wouldn't be a show.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
What about a woman with a strap-on?
Check the Constitution for that one 🙂
Originally posted by Robtard
I was being sarcastic with the "kiddie-****ers", though I do get the impression that there are at least a few people in here that hold a "if the 14 year old girls asks a grown man to **** her, then it's fine" stance.I know you didn't say that, your argument is that it isn't purely the man's fault, which I disagree. They engage the decoys and they drive to the house. If they didn't, then there wouldn't be a show.
I do not take anyway blame away from the men. They certainly deserve the humiliation from the show, but to charge them for something they haven't done yet (and I'm pretty certain they are registered as sex offenders) is a bit much (reminds me of Minority Report in a way but of course it's not the same thing).
THEN AGAIN, if this were not a set up and it actually happened the teenage girl has to take some of responsibility in retrospect (not legally). She gave him the address and let him in the house AND she had a conversation that gave her at least a glimpse of what was about to happen. Again, this takes nothing away from the blame of the man, but all aspects need to be considered.
I understand protecting the kids but THIS PARTICULAR SITUATION is not molestation. In poems, I have mentioned I would likely come close to killing a man if he touched my teenage daughter without her consent. Now if she allowed it, I'm still mad (I'd be mad if it were a boy her age) but why the hell would I be so pissed at the guy for? If I explained it to my daughter and she did what she wanted to do then it's like that sucks but not much I can say...