Dateline: To Catch A Predator

As an adult the responsibility falls soley on you to not molest or attempt to molest children. Them giving consent is meaningless, since they are legally not able to give consent, it makes a very slight difference.

And they aren't charged with molestation, they are charged with attempted molestation (whatever the official name of that is). Keep in mind that many of these guys get very graphic in their online text chat, often even sending nude pictures of themselves to whom they perceive of children. That alone is hugely against the law. In fact, simply having a sexual conversation online with a child or who you think is a child is against the law. Actually showing up to their house to try and **** them just makes it worse.

I think the discussion is whether it is moral not whether it is lawful.

In regards to catching would be pedophiles? It gets my moral vote, as the men do it to themselves.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I think the discussion is whether it is moral not whether it is lawful.

The moral aspect was discussed earlier in the thread.

Originally posted by Robtard
In regards to catching would be pedophiles?

I think so.

Originally posted by Robtard
Obviously, he does. Hence his joke.

Obviously he doesn't. Hence my joke. I did not defend or give excuse for the reasons of pedophilia.

Originally posted by Robtard
though I do get the impression that there are at least a few people in here that hold a "if the 14 year old girls asks a grown man to **** her, then it's fine" stance.

🙂

Originally posted by dadudemon
Obviously he doesn't. Hence my joke. I did not defend or give excuse for the reasons of pedophilia.

Hence he was joking and really doesn't think you're an apologist for pedos.

Originally posted by Blax_Hydralisk
🙂

Pedophile.

Originally posted by Robtard
Hence he was joking and really doesn't think you're an apologist for pedos.

🙁

Originally posted by BackFire
As an adult the responsibility falls soley on you to not molest or attempt to molest children. Them giving consent is meaningless, since they are legally not able to give consent, it makes a very slight difference.

And they aren't charged with molestation, they are charged with attempted molestation (whatever the official name of that is). Keep in mind that many of these guys get very graphic in their online text chat, often even sending nude pictures of themselves to whom they perceive of children. That alone is hugely against the law. In fact, simply having a sexual conversation online with a child or who you think is a child is against the law. Actually showing up to their house to try and **** them just makes it worse.

Very true, yet those underage profile themselves as older........

Originally posted by lord xyz
Then every adult I've spoken to on the net has broken the law.

Every adult has spoken sexually to you online? Because someone telling you to go "**** yourself" necessarily doesn't count.

Originally posted by Robtard
Every adult has spoken sexually to you online? Because someone telling you to go "**** yourself" necessarily doesn't count.

Originally posted by lord xyz
No, we engage in sexual discussion. raise_eyebrow

Every adult though?

Is it on the lines of "boys have a penis, girls have a vagina", or "I want you to suck my nuts while pinching my nipples"?

Originally posted by BackFire
As an adult the responsibility falls soley on you to not molest or attempt to molest children. Them giving consent is meaningless, since they are legally not able to give consent, it makes a very slight difference.

Dissagree completely.

Does ANY responsiblility fall on Lot [old Testament] for sex with two underage girls?

Originally posted by shiv
Dissagree completely.

Does ANY responsiblility fall on Lot [old Testament] for sex with two underage girls?

If anything, because they were his daughters.

didn't they drug him first though?

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
It can become an act though, and that is what he is talking about. There is nothing illegal about thinking about sex with a child- its when you download the porn or act on it by perusing a child that you break the law.

Precisely

Originally posted by shiv
Dissagree completely.

Does ANY responsiblility fall on Lot [old Testament] for sex with two underage girls?

lol

YES! the bible renders the age of consent moot!

air tight logic my friend