i dunno about you guys but id rather fight mike tyson or fedor then i would a pit bull.so bale being owned by dogs isnt unheard of.id love to see you people that claim that bale being owned by dogs makes him a loser fight 1 dog yourself.much easier said than done.& since when is fighting 1 on 1>>>fighting groups?have you ever been in a real fight?cause i can tell you that fighting 2 guys was harder for me than fighting 1.im not even a batman fan but bale kicks the ever loving bat$hit out of keaton
who...care...about... the ...damned...dogs 😬
keaton batman got worked by a single thug, if they weren't in a belfry there wouldn't have been batman returns.
sure bale got bitten by some dogs but those dogs were rottwielers belonging to a gangster, something tells me those dogs had lots of practice attacking people.
no, it makes you crazy, as you're the ONLY person to remember that part. tell me, doesn't anyone else remember this bs claim of yours? better yet, FIND the scene and show me it. thats right, you can't because it doesn't exist. no one remembers it because it doesn't exist. you do realize that not one person who has been in this thread remembers this scene except you right?
i'm tired of talking to you. you're clearly just a troll, and the amusement i got from your incredibly stupidity has ended. you're just a sad little fanboy who is upset that keatons batman can't beat bale so you made up a scene to support your argument. the pathetic part is that you must have somehow thought you'd get away with it and that no one would call you on it. i'm not sure whether to laugh at you or feel sorry for you.
i'm rather certain that you realize that the scene doesn't exist, and you're just arguing it out to get a rise out of people. you're a troll, thats all there is to it. i'm done talking to you.
Originally posted by emporerpantsdone talking to me thank you lord thank you. finally the sock stops his arguments and goes on with his life for once. your making progress 🙂
no, it makes you crazy, as you're the ONLY person to remember that part. tell me, doesn't anyone else remember this bs claim of yours? better yet, FIND the scene and show me it. thats right, you can't because it doesn't exist. no one remembers it because it doesn't exist. you do realize that not one person who has been in this thread remembers this scene except you right?i'm tired of talking to you. you're clearly just a troll, and the amusement i got from your incredibly stupidity has ended. you're just a sad little fanboy who is upset that keatons batman can't beat bale so you made up a scene to support your argument. the pathetic part is that you must have somehow thought you'd get away with it and that no one would call you on it. i'm not sure whether to laugh at you or feel sorry for you.
i'm rather certain that you realize that the scene doesn't exist, and you're just arguing it out to get a rise out of people. you're a troll, thats all there is to it. i'm done talking to you.
Originally posted by psycho gundam
who...care...about... the ...damned...dogs 😬keaton batman got worked by a single thug, if they weren't in a belfry there wouldn't have been batman returns.
sure bale got bitten by some dogs but those dogs were rottwielers belonging to a gangster, something tells me those dogs had lots of practice attacking people.
And hungry. Which the Joker used to his advantage against that silly-accented mob leader.
keatons batman doesn't stand a chance. why do people care so much about the dogs? bale took the dogs out rather easily each time. the second time there were two of them and he got knocked down with the joker smacking the hell out of him at the same time. bale then knocked the joker away and made quick work of the dogs.
bale batman would curbstomp the stiff, slow, and wussy keaton batman. keaton batman got owned by a random thug in the belltower, and his reflexes proved to be crap when the other thug jumped him from behind in the belltower. lucky for keaton that guy gell through the floor.
Originally posted by emporerpantskeaton took alot harder punches than bale did and still stood up. his armor and belt is more advnaced than bales if you havent noticed that by now.
keatons batman doesn't stand a chance. why do people care so much about the dogs? bale took the dogs out rather easily each time. the second time there were two of them and he got knocked down with the joker smacking the hell out of him at the same time. bale then knocked the joker away and made quick work of the dogs.bale batman would curbstomp the stiff, slow, and wussy keaton batman. keaton batman got owned by a random thug in the belltower, and his reflexes proved to be crap when the other thug jumped him from behind in the belltower. lucky for keaton that guy gell through the floor.
Originally posted by emporerpantseveryone likes bale better because he was a much better actor to play as batman and i even admit that. bale is a better bruce wayne and made batman more realistic than keaton did. but readt he begining of the thread this isnt about which actor you like better its about the characters. but keatons suit was more durable he was a better fighter and his bat belt had more toys. you dont want to admit any of the crap happened to bale cause your a big fanboy. ive even admitted myself that keaton got whipped hard in both movies all you talk about is all the good stuff about bale and dont admit none of the parts where he got whipped and thats just fanboyism and you know it
bale batman for the win. i can see that no one is arguing for keaton anymore. so that means the bale gets the win. time to close the topic i guess.
Originally posted by spidey-dude
everyone likes bale better because he was a much better actor to play as batman and i even admit that. bale is a better bruce wayne and made batman more realistic than keaton did. but readt he begining of the thread this isnt about which actor you like better its about the characters. but keatons suit was more durable he was a better fighter and his bat belt had more toys. you dont want to admit any of the crap happened to bale cause your a big fanboy. ive even admitted myself that keaton got whipped hard in both movies all you talk about is all the good stuff about bale and dont admit none of the parts where he got whipped and thats just fanboyism and you know it
Keaton was most certainly not a better fighter. At all...
Originally posted by spidey-dude
everyone likes bale better because he was a much better actor to play as batman and i even admit that. bale is a better bruce wayne and made batman more realistic than keaton did. but readt he begining of the thread this isnt about which actor you like better its about the characters. but keatons suit was more durable he was a better fighter and his bat belt had more toys. you dont want to admit any of the crap happened to bale cause your a big fanboy. ive even admitted myself that keaton got whipped hard in both movies all you talk about is all the good stuff about bale and dont admit none of the parts where he got whipped and thats just fanboyism and you know it
I agree...
Bale fits the role of Batman better, but Keaton's Batman had better stuff...
Originally posted by Tenebrous
Yes he did dude. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you've taken some martial arts before. I have taken Muay Thai, Judo, and Brazilian Jiu Jitsu (at one time or another, not all at once, obviously).That bullshit Keaton did was just theatrical hollywood "martial arts." Bale Batman was doing "some" real martial arts. He was using quick jabs and a lot of elbows. Anyone who takes serious martial arts knows that elbows are an extremely proficient way of knocking out one's opponent; faster than a punch if you are really good at it. bale batman doesn't kick that much. This is in-line with real world martial arts as kicking expends one's energy a lot more than punching/elbowing, and we all know how many goons bale batman has to stomp out.
And how do you know that rottweilers are easier to take down than "brutes?" Have you ever tried wrestling with either one? I haven't, but to just say "large dogs are easier to deal with than big dudes"....Come on man...debate intelligently.
Not to derail this thread but what MA styles are you talking about? There are a many MA's that prefer kicking to keep distance, sweep, and seriously damage opponents. I'd figure with you being knowledgeable of Muay Thai, you would have noticed the kick-to-punch ratio most of their fights have. That being said, Bale did show more impressive fighting skills by taking down numerous opponents at a time and would probably beat Keaton's Batman.
Originally posted by carnage52the batmobile had shields, the tumbler blew the hell up. and keaton still had the batjet thing with rockets and shit (though the targeting system was fu(ked) 😉
oh hellz no.tumbler>>>>>>>>batmobile
but anyway, keaton may have a better armoured suit, but it may be too armoured slowing him down. he is mostly stationary when he defends himself cause i bet with the thick ass abdominal armour, he can't bend at the waist and perform agile movements. and the neck thing is a huge disadvantage since he can't turn his head if bale throws a shot at his mouth.
Originally posted by socool8520
Not to derail this thread but what MA styles are you talking about? There are a many MA's that prefer kicking to keep distance, sweep, and seriously damage opponents. I'd figure with you being knowledgeable of Muay Thai, you would have noticed the kick-to-punch ratio most of their fights have. That being said, Bale did show more impressive fighting skills by taking down numerous opponents at a time and would probably beat Keaton's Batman.
Bale would win, UNTIL Keaton retreated to his Bat Jet...